Rider Aimed at Stopping Marijuana Legalization in Washington, D.C., Reflects Prohibitionist Weakness

The omnibus spending bill making its way through Congress includes a provision that aims to keep marijuana illegal in Washington, D.C., contrary to the wishes of the District's residents. In my latest Forbes column, I argue that what looks like a victory for pot prohibitionists is actually a sign of their weakness. Here is how the piece starts:
The omnibus spending bill that Congress is expected to approve this week includes a rider aimed at blocking marijuana legalization in Washington, D.C. Whether it actually will do that is a matter of debate, and the way this provision was passed suggests that pot prohibitionists are in a weaker position than ever before.
The rider, introduced by Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), says "none of the funds contained in this Act may be used to enact any law, rule, or regulation to legalize or otherwise reduce penalties associated with the possession, use, or distribution of any schedule I substance." House Appropriations Committee Chairman Hal Rogers (R-Ky.), another ardent drug warrior, claims this spending restriction "prohibits both federal and local funds from being used to implement a referendum legalizing recreational marijuana use in the District." But that is not quite accurate, since the rider refers to enactment, not implementation.
By contrast, an earlier version of the Harris rider dealt with spending to "enact or carry out" decriminalization or legalization of any Schedule I drug. Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia's congressional delegate, says that difference could prove crucial, because Initiative 71, the D.C. ballot measure legalizing marijuana possession, home cultivation, and sharing, "was enacted when it was approved overwhelmingly by voters in November." The initiative's elimination of penalties for specified marijuana-related activities is "self-executing," Norton says, requiring no additional legislation by the D.C. Council or by Congress. In other words, the event Harris seeks to prevent has already happened.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Yeah, kind of like getting angry was Hulk's weakness.
Not seeing how this is a weakness of pot prohibitionists so much as a bill drafting error by congressional staffers.
sorry, we had to arrest you for a non crime because we didn't have the funding to not arrest you.
You forget the insane troll logic. They're not going to arrest you, just charge your money with a crime and run forfeiture proceedings against that, because it's 'drug money'
Question for Mr. Sullum: With the rider inserted by Rohrabacher, does this mean the Feds have to drop the case against the Kettle Falls 5?
I buy almost everything except food and clothing from online auctions most people aren't aware of the almost I unbelievable deals that they can get from online auction sites the site that has the best deals is.....
BEST HOME BASE GIFT-------- http://snipr.com/29inp5v
I consider this the second step (along with leaving the prohibition for funding for Second Amendment rights restoration in the same bill) of a long process the Republicans will pursue to convince people to vote Democratic in 2016.