Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

On The Independents One-Year Anniversary Show: Tortured Grubers, LeBron & Lena, Julian Sanchez, Scott Brown, More Heroes of Freedom, and Saucy Aftershow!

Matt Welch | 12.9.2014 8:19 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Tonight The Independents (Fox Business Network, 9 p.m. ET, 6 p.m. PT, repeats three hours later) is largely concerned with the two huge pieces of news from Capitol Hill today: the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence's long-overdue release of the (summary of the) Torture Report, and smarmy Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber being grilled by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Joining to discuss are Party Panelists Charles W. Cooke (National Review) and Sherrod Small (comedian), as well as Cato Institute scholar and former Reasoner Julian Sanchez, ex-CIA intel dude Mike Baker, and serial senatorial loser Scott Brown. Other topics to be discussed include royal protocol, the president on Colbert, Lena Dunham's legal woes, and our latest Heroes of Freedom.

Online-only aftershow begins at foxbusiness.com/independents just after 10. Follow The Independents on Facebook at facebook.com/IndependentsFBN, follow on Twitter @ independentsFBN, hashtag us at #TheIndependents, and click on this page for more video of past segments.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Donate to Reason! Because We Let You Fling Your Monkey-Poo at Us on Live Television!

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsThe IndependentsWorldCultureCivil LibertiesPolicyObamacareTortureTransparencyRape
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (329)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    They tortured Gruber???

    1. GILMORE   11 years ago

      We should be so lucky

    2. Libertarian   11 years ago

      My god, he was locked in a room with Pelosi. Hasn't he suffered enough?

  2. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    I'm starting a petition to officially have Jonathan Gruber be referred to as HANS GRUBER.

    Will you sign?

    PS: Matt, you don't need to send me a 'personal' email to give. I gave. I also have cans of non-perishables if Reason so desires.

    1. Sevo   11 years ago

      "Matt, you don't need to send me a 'personal' email to give"

      Aw, I'm crushed! Here I thought that was only sent to me!

    2. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      I prefer "Herr Doktor Gruber."

      And photoshopping a monocle and riding crop on all his pictures.

  3. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Open thoughts: I'm surprised the drummer of Def Leppard doesn't have a prosthetic.

    1. Libertarian   11 years ago

      I just looked up "off topic" in the dictionary. Nice pic of you.

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

        Thanks.

    2. GILMORE   11 years ago

      What would he do with it? I'd guess it would simply serve as Ballast to keep him from falling off his chair.

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

        YOU PEOPLE HAVE NO IMAGINATION.

        You have the imagi but you don't have the nation.

        1. GILMORE   11 years ago

          I've seen him play; their music doesn't seem like it suffers much from the lack of drumming appendages

          1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

            Ha.

  4. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

    Lena Dunham asks you to imagine a world where women are never treated to skepticism over rape claims

    Speaking out about the realities and complexities of sexual assault is how we begin to protect each other. I do not want our daughters born into a world that reacts to sexual violence against women in this way. This reaction, which ranges from skepticism to condemnation to threats of violence, is something I have been subject to as a woman in a position of extraordinary privilege. So let us then imagine the trauma experienced by low-income families, women of color, the trans community, survivors with disabilities, students on financial aid, sex workers, inmates, foster children, those who do not have my visibility, my access to medical and mental health care, or my financial and legal resources.

    [...]

    Survivors have the right to tell their stories, to take back control after the ultimate loss of control. There is no right way to survive rape and there is no right way to be a victim. What survivors need more than anything is to be supported, whether they choose to pursue a criminal investigation or to rebuild their world on their own terms. You can help by never defining a survivor by what has been taken from her. You can help by saying I believe you.

    For a bunch of rational atheists they sure do place a high amount of value on believing things without proof.

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      It's almost as if there were no automatic connection between atheism and rationality.

    2. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      When Howard Stern said he found her funny and even posted her speech to him during his birthday bash I realized it was time to stop listening to him for good.

      1. Libertymike   11 years ago

        Why would one ever have listened to him in the first place?

        Its not as if he was the least bit entertaining or ever had anything interesting to say.

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

          He had his moments in the 1990s. I was entertained. Now it's all so forced and he's not an iconoclast anymore.

          1. SusanM   11 years ago

            Oh, he tries from what I hear but iconoclasm is a game for the young. It goes from young turk up against The Man to The Man complaining about the kids on your lawn - to the kids.

        2. SusanM   11 years ago

          I liked the Howard Stern of yesterday who would have hated the Howard Stern of today.

          1. Bobarian (Mr. Xtreme)   11 years ago

            ^^This

            He sold Anthony Cumia down the river recently for shit he used to do (offend people)

            1. SusanM   11 years ago

              I was thinking more about Howard doing "America's Got Talent!" but there's that, too.

          2. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

            Well put. I agree. He IS the establishment now.

    3. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

      I do not want our daughters born into a world that reacts to sexual violence against women in this way.

      1) Lena Dunham is the textbook definition of "Do not want"

      2) "Our" daughters?

      You can help by saying I believe you.

      I wonder if there's a limit to this. If some woman went public with the most obvious whopper of a lie, (e.g. got raped by One Direction at midfield during the Super Bowl halftime show) would the #BelieveHer movement run with it?

      1. Agammamon   11 years ago

        Yes - because they will be supporting her *for the right reasons*.

        Just as those who were skeptical of the Rolling Stone story were RIGHT, but they were right for the wrong reasons - therefore they were wrong.

        1. Old Man With Candy   11 years ago

          Truthiness.

    4. widget   11 years ago

      Speaking out about the realities and complexities of sexual assault is how we begin to protect each other..

      And the best way to bring this to our attention is to make things up. If you send a few annoying white upper-middle-class frat boys to prison so they can get raped every day for 10 years, the eggs are broken and a delicious omelet follows.

      The reality is that any man who is convicted of rape, guilty or not, will be at the bottom of the pecking order at a men's-only prison. Let's talk.

      1. Agammamon   11 years ago

        *Child-rapists* - sure. Because they are seen as weak and easy prey - no one wants to stand up and defend a kiddie-fiddler.

        Regular rapist - that's a 'manly' crime and theirs no particular stigma attached to it in the pen.

        1. MJGreen   11 years ago

          Well in her case it's a Republican student at Oberlin, who decided to go after Lena Dunham twice. I'm guessing "Barry" would be prime rib in the clink.

    5. PapayaSF   11 years ago

      "Imagine a world in which men accused of rape are assumed guilty by default. You know, like black men in the Old South. None of this rape-denial crap, Atticus Finch!"

      1. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

        Certainly Mayella Ewell being raped by the guy who walked by her house every day is more plausible than what Rolling Stone published.

      2. widget   11 years ago

        I still say "To Kill a Mockingbird" was written, primarily, by Truman Capote. And he got a silent kick out that. OK, maybe a good yarn on Harper Lee's part, and she might have to gotten to 80% or 90% on it, but she didn't put the touch on it.

    6. Hyperion   11 years ago

      I have been and still am pretty convinced that the entire story with Dunham and her sidekicks is that they are so obsessed about convincing anyone who will believe it, that someone actually wants to have sex with them. That someone actually wants to have sex with them so much that they force it. It's very sad. I mean, even as homely as Dunham is, if her behavior wasn't so repulsive, she might actually find someone in the world willing to do it.

      1. Hyperion   11 years ago

        Also, these leftist morons have a very distinct lack of ability to learn from their masters.

        When they get caught in a lie, isn't the correct response to say it's a fake scandal and move on to the next even bigger lie?

    7. MJGreen   11 years ago

      Why you chose to speak out... years after it happened, as a cute story in your cute self-aggrandizing book, instead of going to the police to keep a sexual abuser from hurting other women.

      You go girl!

    8. double ham fisted   11 years ago

      Imagine a world in which woman never falsely accused a man of rape.

  5. GILMORE   11 years ago

    I have somehow managed to get through life with no strong views* about abortion, really (I blame the 1990s)....

    ... but thinking about this gives me a headache =

    What looks to be a so-dumb-you-might-as-well-be-retarded woman leaves newborn baby in dumpster to die; she now faces attempted-murder charges.

    There's got to be at least 3 or 4 moral-dillemas going on there that i'd think would horribly complicate anyone's 100% view on the issue either way. Or maybe not: I consistently make the mistake of assuming that everyone 'thinks their 'beliefs' through'

    Anyhoo. The even-far-more "ick" inducing thought is, "what damaged-animal-instict compelled some individual to breed after looking into these eyes?"

    1. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

      "what damaged-animal-instict compelled some individual to breed after looking into these eyes?"

      I guess for a lot of dudes, a piece of ass is a piece of ass.

    2. PapayaSF   11 years ago

      "Englert's family has said she has a learning disability, didn't know she was pregnant and couldn't understand why what she did was wrong."

      Some guys will screw anything. Looks almost like she has fetal alcohol syndrome to me.

    3. Paul.   11 years ago

      If only abortion were legal, none of this would ever happen.

  6. Sevo   11 years ago

    Further weaseling by Gruber:

    ..."he defended the Affordable Care Act as a significant law that benefits the public. "My own inexcusable arrogance is not a flaw in the Affordable Care Act."
    http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/09/.....index.html
    That may be correct, but the "flaw" was included by either him or someone else with his knowledge and approval.
    CNN also suggests his 'faulty memory' (lies) concerning his pay is going to get him another invitation to discuss the matter.

    Also, NBC finally had to admit to its audience there is this guy named "Gruber":
    "Gruber's 'Glib' Obamacare Remarks Will Keep Haunting Democrats"
    [...]
    "I do not think the Affordable Care Act was passed in a non-transparent fashion,"
    http://www.nbcnews.com/politic.....ts-n264741
    Lying (again) in such a transparent fashion is probably not going to help his cause. NBC

  7. GILMORE   11 years ago

    Korean Air Line heiress and executive goes ballistic over Deez Nuts

    "A recent Korean Air Lines flight was delayed when its chairman's daughter, who was also vice president responsible for cabin service at the airline, ordered a senior crew member off the plane. The crime? Allowing her and other passengers in the pointy end of the aircraft to be served bagged macadamia nuts instead of nuts on a plate."

    It makes more sense when you understand that most of Koreas major corporations are run like Family Fiefdoms that make the word 'nepotism' woefully insufficient. Half the time the ruling family is doing their best to rob the place blind without investors squawking too hard about it.

    1. Agammamon   11 years ago

      She wasn't wrong - only wrong about how she went about taking care of the problem.

      The airline's cabin crew are required to ask first class passengers whether they want nuts, partly to avoid serving them to people with allergies. The nuts also should have been served on a plate.

      The crew got lazy/complacent and didn't follow procedures. Dismissal/censure of the team leader is not inappropriate and not an example of a spoiled rich person - 'over-mighty behavior by the offspring of the moneyed elite' - but of a senior executive catching a mistake by employees. The higher up the guy who first catches your screw-up, the worse you can expect the consequences to be - because if your boss' boss finds one mistake he's gonna assume that there's a whole lot more he's missed.

      What *is* bullshit and an example of a spoiled princess is the public spat and delay of the flight. Just bad PR all around - none of those people want to be *delayed* over a bag of peanuts. Fix the problem but don't inconvenience your customers.

      1. Old Man With Candy   11 years ago

        It wasn't peanuts- it was macadamias. There's a world of difference.

        Now apologize!

  8. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Prediction: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY! I give it another six months.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Welcome to the gun show I guess.

  10. Libertarian   11 years ago

    They put together a COMIC BOOK to explain "health care reform"? I can't remember the last time I went 24 hours without thinking of the movie Idiocracy.

  11. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    KMELE IS OFF?!

    Paid I hope.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Foster's disappeared again? What is this show hiding?

  13. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Get back there? It's naive to think we're not still there.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    And he called them gooks.

  15. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    PUTIN DISAGREES.

    /pets leopard.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Look at the ratings for 24.

  17. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    80% of independents support torture!

    Will the Independents confront this?

  18. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    Look, the comedian has some good points, but he's not, like, *funny.*

  19. Libertymike   11 years ago

    The Independents is must not see TV as long as that obnoxious Kennedy is a host.

    How annoying is Kennedy? She is worse than hair on soap.

    1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

      You're way too harsh. She's fine. Just needs to dial it down a notch or two.

  20. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Is listening to Kennedy interrupt guest considered torture?

    1. Grand Moff Serious Man   11 years ago

      Only if you are being forced to watch. Everyone else is engaging in masochism or consensual sadism.

      1. Sevo   11 years ago

        Not me. I'm relying on you guys to take one for the team.

  21. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Frank Lloyd Wrong. Missed opportunity, Kennedy.

  22. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Mister Officer John McCain wasn't in this hearing. That's a shame.

  23. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

    Can we just skip to the part where we tie Gruber to a pole and slow slice him?

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      *Must* you post that or joke about it?

      1. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

        Some folks just need slow slicin'.

        1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

          I think that might be considered torture.

    2. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

      That image was almost as bad as the Hillary Clinton country music video.

    3. Raven Nation   11 years ago

      Is that the Boxer Rebellion?

  24. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Cooke nailed that.

  25. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

    So what did they promise him for lying under oath?

  26. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

    I'm so glad I don't twat. That way I don't run the risk of having to go to NYC or be on this show.

    1. BigT   11 years ago

      Excellent

  27. GILMORE   11 years ago

    Mike Baker has been taking Shark Sperm injections to appear younger

    1. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

      That works?

      1. GILMORE   11 years ago

        The trick is knowing where to inject it

  28. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

    When did you stop beating your wife?

  29. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    You torture our own people to *help them resist torture!* Duh.

    1. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

      Except what we do to our own people isn't torture.

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

        I think the point is that we do it in training precisely because it *is* torture!

        1. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

          You think incorrectly.

          There is a difference between an interrogation technique and torture. They are two different things.

          1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

            All right, how about "stuff we'd protest vigorously if it happened to our POWs."

            1. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

              I have no doubt that the US actually engaged in "real" torture. A fact I find repulsive and reprehensible.

              But most of what these politicians are talking about doesn't rise to the definition of "real" torture. Sleep deprivation, humiliation, playing loud Justin Bieber music...not "real" torture.

              1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

                I'm thinking about freezing a guy to death on a concrete floor, putting someone in a faux-coffin, or whatever it was which made the other guy beg for death.

                1. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

                  Huh?

                  1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

                    http://reason.com/blog/2014/12.....to-be-sure

                    1. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

                      Yes, that is real torture.

  30. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

    Incorrect.

  31. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Objectively, I have to say on this topic that your pocket square should match your tie.

    1. Sevo   11 years ago

      Or you could use a white pocket square.

    2. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

      your pocket square should match your tie.

      No, no no!

      Too matchy-matchy! Ugh!

      1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

        THEN DON'T HAVE A POCKET SQUARE.

        1. Sevo   11 years ago

          Ya don't have to yell...

          1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

            I don't know what it takes to get through your thick skulls.

            1. Sevo   11 years ago

              Jeeze, coach, what's a 5-yard penalty?

        2. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

          You, sir, reek of the stables.

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      I root for the bad guys.

  32. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    If you're saying the investigation was incomplete? DUH!

  33. Heroic Mulatto   11 years ago

    Baker: Kennedy! Get rekt, m8!

  34. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    THEY'VE TAKEN KENNEDY OUT OF THE PICTURE COMPLETELY.

  35. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Phewww. For a second there I thought Baker and Sanchez were going to debate directly.

  36. BigT   11 years ago

    Did she just call the Dutchess a Bitch of Protocol?

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      Ah, I say, no, she did not, girlfriend!

  37. GILMORE   11 years ago

    The Independents Attire Review, 9 December 2014

    Anniversary-Edition

    - Kennedy: GOOD WITCH-Kennedy! Someone must have dropped a house on Bad-Witch Kennedy and her unpleasant Black T-Shirt. I always thought 'pure white' was something of a TV-no-no; something either to do with a conspiracy by transistor-tube manufacturers, or bad-Mojo related to the show "Touched By An Angel". Either way, we're getting 'Eloi'-vibes; we'd call it apropos 'travel-wear' for anyone considering a trip to the distant future.

    - Matt: Blue-X-3, redux. A slightly different mix to prior versions; we like the contrast here more than the Royal-on-Royal combo, but this Navy-ish tie doesn't pop quite as much as the Royal Blue w/ the same shirt. (we think this would be better w/ white; but its sort of a 'meh' difference either way)

    - Julian: The Old Dirty Sanchez makes a return, and we are always floored by his daring magnificence. We want to use words like 'flair' and 'elan', even though we have no idea what they really mean. We suspect the checked hanky has something to do with it. He is one of these people who flaunts the 'rules' by choice rather than by accident and still emerges sharp-as-shit. Victory goes to the Ringer in absence of any challenge from Kmele, whom we pine for.

    ?????

  38. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    Did someone say, "the right to personhood"?

  39. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Mike Judge I guess should be on the list.

  40. PapayaSF   11 years ago

    Berkeley protesters shut down roads, then complain about having to walk home.

    Berkeley rioter complains about jail food, which looks more substantial than a Michelle Obama school lunch.

  41. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    THEY'LL NEVER TAKE OUR FREEDOM FRIES!

  42. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    George Washington v. William Wallace:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl7CLaZFG1c

    1. Irish   11 years ago

      I like this one.

      Juliet steals it. Her facial expressions and body language are hilarious.

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

        Heh.

        Their latest:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfkR5o_bcSg

        1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

          Oops, *this* is their latest, and it's not quite as good.
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIsa-vfXV6Q

    2. seguin   11 years ago

      Thats one of my favorites. The whole George Washington / Dirty Souf thing gets me right here. *tears up*

  43. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    How do you hang someone with no head?

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      If you didn't read the instructions and do the execution in the wrong order.

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

        "Wait, it says hang *first*, then draw and quarter!"

    2. GILMORE   11 years ago

      She mixed up the sequence somewhat.

      in case you want to get an idea of the process, try Chapter 1 of Discipline and Punish

  44. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    In vino veritas, sugar tits.

  45. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    The problem isn't that he goes on Colbert. The problem is that he does it in lieu of actual interviews.

  46. IceTrey   11 years ago

    It seems that no one has realized that we can figure out how fast Brown was moving during the shooting from the physical evidence. Brown moved towards Wilson 25'. The audio of the shots is 6.5 seconds long with a 3 second pause apparently when Brown paused. That means that Brown moved 25' in 3.5 seconds. That means that Brown was moving at 4.8 mph, hardly a charge, more like a brisk walk. Try it yourself. So was Brown charging "full speed", head down as Wilson and some witnesses allege or was he stumbling forward with 4 gunshot wounds? This goes to the reasonableness of Wilson's fear and the accuracy of his testimony. It certainly seems like enough to indict.

    1. GILMORE   11 years ago

      Needs more retarded speculation

      1. IceTrey   11 years ago

        What part of "physical evidence" do you not understand moron?

        1. IceTrey   11 years ago

          An average person walks at about 4mph. A jogger runs at about 10mph. 10mph is 14.6fps. Brown would have covered the 25 feet in less than 2 seconds. The first round of shots alone lasted 2 seconds. The slowest player at the NFL combine ran 14mph, he was 6'6" 300 pounds. Anything else?

          1. IceTrey   11 years ago

            Crap, this was for Papaya.

      2. IceTrey   11 years ago

        I'll even do the math since you're such an idiot.

        25/3.5=7fps 7fps=4.8mph

        1. GILMORE   11 years ago

          Tell us about how 9/11 was a hoax now

          1. IceTrey   11 years ago

            You understand these facts, Brown moved 25' towards Wilson and the shooting took 6.5 seconds with a 3 second pause, come straight from the cops right? Do you understand how math works?

            1. GILMORE   11 years ago

              Its great how you saw all that in the sound. No assumptions being made at all. What a scientist you are. And you have math too. You get a Gold Star for Derp.

              1. IceTrey   11 years ago

                Wow. There's an audio recording of the shots. It lasts 6.5 seconds. There is a 3 second pause. This matches Wilson's own testimony, he shot, Brown paused, he shot again. 6.5-3=3.5. Got it? So derppitty derp derp FUCK OFF!

              2. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

                I think IceTrey fancies himself as Juror #8.

                1. IceTrey   11 years ago

                  No the prosecutor. Can you disprove the FACTS or are you just an asshole making snarky comments?

                  1. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

                    Definitely an asshole.

                  2. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

                    Back, and to the left. Back, and to the left.

                    1. IceTrey   11 years ago

                      Except mine is actual physical evidence from the cops.

                    2. IceTrey   11 years ago

                      It's like having JFK's head in your hands.

                    3. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

                      Look, I only say what my Illuminatus Lizard People overlords tell me to say!

                    4. IceTrey   11 years ago

                      It's nice you're making jokes about someone's death at the hands of a cop that has unleashed protestation and chaos across the entire nation. Good work.

                    5. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

                      IceTrey, lighting that social signal!

                      NO ONE cares more!

    2. PapayaSF   11 years ago

      Your conclusion does not follow from that evidence. You can't tell from just the audio and the blood trail how fast Brown was moving. Plus, more witnesses said Brown was "charging" than disagreed (7 to 5).

      1. IceTrey   11 years ago

        25/3.5=7fps=4.8mph

        1. GILMORE   11 years ago

          How many chucks does a woodchuck chuck? Show your work

          1. IceTrey   11 years ago

            I can't tell if your trolling or your just the most stupid person I've ever encountered on Reason. I'm going with the latter.

            1. Old Man With Candy   11 years ago

              the most stupid person I've ever encountered on Reason

              Perhaps one of your other handles?

    3. Buddy Bizarre   11 years ago

      Paul Cassell @ Volokh Conspiracy investigates & comes up with different numbers.

      The overlooked audiotape of the Michael Brown shooting

      1. Buddy Bizarre   11 years ago

        SF'd...

        http://www.washingtonpost.com/.....-shooting/

  47. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Now that's a sweater.

  48. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    WHAT THE FUCK, BERNIER?

  49. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    That guy's head must have been hit by too many hockey pucks.

  50. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    That went right through the five-hole.

  51. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    HAHA. Love the guy in the Hartford Whalers hat.

  52. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    McCain wasn't having any of this royals business.

  53. LynchPin1477   11 years ago

    Your public service announcement: Victoria's Secret Fashion Show tonight @ 10:00 pm on CBS

  54. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    Uh, Kennedy, did you at least Google "South Africa snow"?

    http://www.getaway.co.za/trave.....th-africa/

  55. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    NO I WANT TO BE THE BEST GAS MEASUREMENT COMPANY IN THE WORLD.

  56. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Is this gas meter from Manufacturing Marvels filling in for Foster tonight?

  57. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    You can't touch them because all that inbreeding left their bones brittle as all get out.

  58. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    HA! You Canadian fucks.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Retarded Ontarian square heads lose their minds over the Monarchy.

      1. GILMORE   11 years ago

        Squareheads? I thought that was a slang-slander for people of Scandinavian-ancestry in the upper-midwest US.

        1. SusanM   11 years ago

          I think those are called Bohunks

          1. BigT   11 years ago

            Bohunks are people like me - Bohemian.

            1. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

              Don't forget the hunk portion of that = Hungarian.

              (Mrs. Lytton is a bohunk)

          2. GILMORE   11 years ago

            Rufus version =

            " square head
            A literally translated derogatory term used by French-Canadians to describe English-Canadians. But always spoken/written in it's French form. Can be used in a good natured way between friends. Kind of the opposite of "Frog".
            Most English-Canadians are unaware of it's usage"

            To be fair, 'definition #1' is closer to mine. Who knew.

            1. Swiss Servator, Winter kommt!   11 years ago

              von Richthoven: I must now tell you of the full horror of what awaits you.

              Black Adder: Ah, you see, Balders. Dress it up in any amount of pompous verbal diarrhoea, and the message is `Squareheads down for the big Boche gang-bang'.

        2. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

          Tete-carre (square heads) are what Quebecers call English-Canadians.

  59. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Not Quebec that's for sure.

  60. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    GODDAMMIT KENNEDY LET HIM FINISH HIS POINT.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      She's on a roll tonight.

  61. GILMORE   11 years ago

    Commonwealth nations have some bizarre fixation with royals

    1. Raven Nation   11 years ago

      With some dissenters:

      http://www.ouridentity.org.au/

    2. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      We're part of the Commonwealth. Not so weird.

      Canada remains Loyalist in large parts of the country.

  62. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

    She's a cunt.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Big time cunt.

      1. GILMORE   11 years ago

        I'm going to play devil's-advocate for the sake of an argument and posit alternatively that she's a Horrible Cunt

        1. Bill Dalasio   11 years ago

          I disagree. Cunts are somewhat desirable. And definitely serve a useful purpose.

          Can't say as much for Ms. Dunham.

      2. seguin   11 years ago

        I like cunts. She's more of a trench.

  63. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Narcissist=liar.

  64. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Matt. You just admitted you find Dunham interesting on TV.

    Just reminding you.

  65. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    They should have photoshopped Foster out of that graphic.

  66. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    I am at the very least impressed at how Lena Dunham can be so successful in the media world without being attractive, intelligent, or particularly careful about accuracy.

    1. GILMORE   11 years ago

      She's a hero to drab, boring, mediocre, talentless people everywhere

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

        She must at least be hard-working to succeed with all her other disadvantages?

    2. PapayaSF   11 years ago

      Accuracy means nothing. I think she's probably bright, though it's smothered by trendy PC dogma. She's homely, but homely women have done OK on the screen in the past, though usually as secondary characters, especially if they are funny.

    3. Bill Dalasio   11 years ago

      Well, I will concede I admire her chutzpah in publishing an article about how anyone who doubts her is a rape apologist while her publisher pays off her accuser.

    4. Stampede   11 years ago

      She's not any more successful than Roseanne Barr or Rosie O'Donnell were at the peak of their careers. It's a short and steep way down though, and I think she's beginning to realize this, hence the carpe'ing of her diem.

      1. Sevo   11 years ago

        "the carpe'ing of her diem."

        I'm stealing that.

    5. Paul.   11 years ago

      Lena Dunham can be so successful in the media world without being attractive, intelligent, or particularly careful about accuracy.

      It's the perfect recipe for the NPR crowd.

  67. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Fuck this SHOW US THE BEEFCAKE

  68. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    I'm still reeling from Matt's Dunham declaration.

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      He should be inspired by Gruber and

      (a) deny he meant it

      (b) say it was spoken accidentally

      (c) apologize fulsomely and ask that this whole squalid episode be forgotten

    2. Irish   11 years ago

      What did he say?

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

        He said he finds Dunham 'interesting'.

        1. Paul.   11 years ago

          I once found something on the bottom of my shoe "interesting".

  69. BigT   11 years ago

    Only 147 comments. Is the honeymoon over for the Independents?

  70. GILMORE   11 years ago

    Scott Brown = comes off a pretty straight shooter for a politician. I like him.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Too bad New Hampshire didn't.

  71. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Can Welch cash checks with the name Walsh on them?

  72. BigT   11 years ago

    He should have slammed the cake in Kennedy's face.

  73. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    AH! Lou Dobbs.

  74. PapayaSF   11 years ago

    Here's to another year! Good luck, folks.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      I suppose congratulations is in order at the one year mark.

      /blows party thingy.

  75. GILMORE   11 years ago

    The picture of Kmele looks like he's now the Generalissimo of the Democratic Republic of the Independents of East America

    DOBBS!

  76. Buddy Bizarre   11 years ago

    So... if they keep a gluten free cake in front of Kennedy more often, she might interrupt less often?

  77. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Holy shit are you guys listening to Obama on Dobbs?

    FRIGHTENING.

    1. Hyperion   11 years ago

      Holy shit are you guys listening to Obama on Dobbs?

      Why would I start now?

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

        Yeah but the shit he was saying on BET.

        Unbelievable.

        1. Hyperion   11 years ago

          I believe it and I don't even know what it was. But I will believe it no matter what it was.

        2. Irish   11 years ago

          What did he say on BET?

          I REFUSE TO DO MY OWN RESEARCH!

          1. GILMORE   11 years ago

            "Burn this bitch to the ground"?

  78. GILMORE   11 years ago

    Dobbs just called 'BET' the 'Black Television Entertainment Network'.

    Oh, and for people who never ever bothered to help me figure out why the aftershow livestream never worked for me - it was AdBlock

    Oh, look, they're talking about where to score Smack in NYC

  79. Irish   11 years ago

    So Glenn Greenwald's The Intercept published an article today criticizing Rolling Stone which suggested that the 'rape epidemic' is inflated and not a real threat.

    Every time I think feminists could not conceivably get dumber, they prove me wrong. In the comments section, literally a dozen people mentioned that ludicrous 1 in 4 stat that's been repeatedly debunked.

    One person argued that rape culture has to exist, because there was one study about East Asia in which one out of four men allegedly admitted to committing rapes. First of all, what are the odds that this would also be a one in four statistic? I'm sure it's just a bizarre coincidence that these two totally different studies form opposite sides of the world found a one in four incidence for completely different populations.

    Secondly, what the fuck does a study that focused on rural Thailand and Laos have to do with America? They're two vastly different cultures, so even assuming the East Asian stat were correct, it has no bearing on American college campuses.

    How do these people get this stupid? Is it genetic?

    1. Sevo   11 years ago

      "Is it genetic?"
      I don't think so. Look at Charlie Munger's kids.

    2. Hyperion   11 years ago

      literally a dozen people mentioned that ludicrous 1 in 4 stat that's been repeatedly debunked.

      You do know that once they get their talking points, there's no convincing them otherwise, ever?

      They'll still be calling people global warming deniers when they're up to their arses in snow in San Diego, in July, if their leaders don't change the talking point.

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      The second part. True.

    4. Hyperion   11 years ago

      Secondly, what the fuck does a study that focused on rural Thailand and Laos have to do with America? They're two vastly different cultures, so even assuming the East Asian stat were correct, it has no bearing on American college campuses.

      Lefties routinely ignore demographics completely. To not ignore demographics is racist or something like that.

    5. Irish   11 years ago

      Actually, the article's from four days ago, I just saw it today.

      Anyway, the comment I remember is even dumber than I said up above.

      "For a 'rape culture' to exist, it would require a very large percentage of males to be not only sexually aroused by raping a woman, but willing to actually do it."

      1. Why does it require a large percentage of males to be a culture? Oh, and research in Asia showed that 1 in 4 men admitted to sexually assaulting or raping a woman at least once.

      2. Sexual arousal has little to do with it. It's mostly about power and dominance.

      3. Rapists know better than to discuss their crimes.

      Okay. So his thesis is as follows:

      1. Even if most people are against something it's still the culture. Therefore, even if 99% of men think rape is awful, we still have a rape culture.

      By this logic, we also have a murder culture, but for some reason that's never brought up.

      2. For some reason information about Asia's rapes is somehow relevant to America. Somehow.

      3. Even though we have a rape culture, rapists don't feel comfortable discussing their crimes. Gee, it almost sounds like that's because we don't have a rape culture, and if they talked about their crimes they'd all go to prison.

      1. Irish   11 years ago

        This individual commenter is the gift that keeps on giving:

        Victims of severe trauma often recall details of events differently than they actually happened. This is well documented in psychology. So discrepancies don't necessarily mean it didn't happen. Nice for TRS to blame 'Jackie' for not being dependable when they were the ones who failed to do their due diligence.

        That being said, when my wife was raped the Chief of Police refused to even file a report because he bought the lies told by her rapists friends and told a 15 year old girl that she must have wanted it. And a preachers boy would never do something so awful? So, yes actually, sometimes a few statements from a couple of frat boys will destroy a case because people believe frat boys and rapists more than they do women that have been raped. In our society a woman that says she has been raped has virtually no credibility.

        Now, it's tragic if what he says about his wife is true, although I'm hesitant to believe a random person commenting over the internet about a theoretical rape that he knows about third hand, which he did not witness, and for which he provides no evidence.

        However, his last sentence is idiotic. Women who claim they're raped have so little credibility, that an obviously fake story was reported as unvarnished fact for two weeks based on nothing but a woman's word. That doesn't sound like the problem is not affording women enough credibility.

      2. Hyperion   11 years ago

        You know what's really funny about this entire thing to me? I, as a male, white male member of the patriarchy, never think about rape. Out of all the crazy stuff that goes through my mind on any given day, that's not one of them. I could probably count the number of times that I've thought about rape in my entire life on the fingers of one hand. Sure, like most males, I've spent my entire life thinking about sex several times an hour, but not about rape.

        However, interestingly enough, many feminist women are obsessed with it. It seems that they NEVER stop thinking about it. Why is that?

        1. Irish   11 years ago

          I would not only never discuss this subject again, I would never think about it again if it weren't for feminists using the specter of sexual assault to gut due process and unfairly impugn and castigate innocent people.

          This is yet another example of the way leftists create a super controversial political issue, and then if you disagree with the issue they just politicized, they attack you for allegedly politicizing something serious.

          Feminists politicized rape by lying about rape statistics in order to a) shut down frats and imprison people they don't like, b) gain political power for themselves, c) inflate the budgets of gender studies departments, and d) punish those they deem to be privileged.

          No one has done more damage to rape victims than modern feminists who have stopped rape from being a crime which is taken seriously and have turned it into a political side show.

          1. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

            You two are MONSTERS!*

            *lights social signal

            1. Hyperion   11 years ago

              Compliment accepted.

          2. Derpetologist   11 years ago

            A comedy sketch is forming in my head:

            "I was brutally murdered at a UVA frat house!"

            "But you're still alive..."

            "Don't live-splain to me, you murder-denialist! You're perpetuating murder culture."

            "Can I go now?"

            1. Hyperion   11 years ago

              I get abducted every single night by a UFO full of rape murdering patriarchy aliens! Why don't you believe me!? Rape denier!

          3. Hyperion   11 years ago

            The times I have even thought about it must have been because I saw something about it on the teevee or someone... yeah, ok, it was my sister when I was maybe 17 years old say that some guy tried to rape her.

            For me though, the thought of a woman resisting my sexual advance is extremely unappealing, not something that I would want to think about. It's right up there with sticking my dick in a tank of piranhas.

            1. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

              It's right up there with sticking my dick in a tank of piranhas.

              Stop mocking my fetish!

              1. Irish   11 years ago

                Well, the Intercept's comments just told me that no matter how many men are into something, we can still have a cultural problem.

                As such, I declare that we have a dick-eaten-by-piranhas culture, and believe we should fund studies on how to most effectively deal with this pressing issue.

                1. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

                  +1 victim of the icthyarchy

                  1. Swiss Servator, Winter kommt!   11 years ago

                    *applause*

                2. Hyperion   11 years ago

                  As such, I declare that we have a dick-eaten-by-piranhas culture

                  If I see that on the evening local news tomorrow, that this has become a frightening epidemic with teens and that we need new laws, I won't be surprised at all.

        2. Stampede   11 years ago

          You probably think about being beaten by a cop a lot more than cops think about beating you.

          1. Hyperion   11 years ago

            Yeah, sure, puppies think about being shot by cops all of the time too.

        3. Bill Dalasio   11 years ago

          However, interestingly enough, many feminist women are obsessed with it. It seems that they NEVER stop thinking about it.

          Yup. SJW feminists spend about as much time thinking about rape as Rick Santorum spends thinking about gay sex.

  80. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    How much vodka can you drink during a single break?

    1. Hyperion   11 years ago

      all of it

  81. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Well, the live stream seems to be shitting the bed right now. So, fuck that.

    1. widget   11 years ago

      You are only pleasant first thing in the morning, FOE.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

        And then even only meh.

  82. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    I'm going to guess Foster has had it with < i The Independents and has quit the show. Call that an OFFICIAL PREDICTION.

    1. Sevo   11 years ago

      Why would he? Think the exposure isn't up to snuff?

  83. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Fake steps? WHY EVEN HAVE THEM?

  84. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    You motherfucking fuckshits, every time I have to refresh the page to get the stream to start again you make me watch a bullshit commercial over again?

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Fist gets very angry after a Pens loss to a rival.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

        But look good doing it.

  85. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    The HR guy left just before they started discussing their drug history.

  86. GILMORE   11 years ago

    I nominate Eric Hoffer as a hero of freedom

    He makes a great point in the linked video series about how American Freedom is best appreciated by the Poor. I'd paraphrase it but would get it wrong.

    1. widget   11 years ago

      the Poor.

      I know your jesting with that, GILMORE. "the Rich", "the Foolish", "the Clueless". No titles to the "the score keepers".

      1. GILMORE   11 years ago

        Not sure what you're referring to.

        his point was here =

        "Doesn't it seem to you that free time is the privilege of the working class? =

        Hoffer = 'America is for the Poor! Only we have a good time in this country. The rich have a better time in Europe, even in Russia. Especially intellectuals are better off everywhere else. The only people truly at home in America are the common people. Its god's gift to the poor. For the first time in history the common people do things on their own...."

        He goes on to point out in later segments that the poor aren't crushed by the kind of nepotism in the Old World which kept social classes very distinctly stratified. That 'American Culture' mostly comes from and is for 'the poorest'. We don't idolize classics - we reward new ideas. Etc.

        He also later notes that "freedom" is most appreciated by poor people while rich intellectuals think they should prefer socialism. Poor people actually take pride in small achievements like their home, their job, their kids, and simple things like 'freedom to move' that rich people dont even think about.
        .

        1. Stampede   11 years ago

          How much experience with actual poor people do you have? You may be idealizing them a little bit.

          The ones I run into are quite comfortable with living off welfare.

      2. GILMORE   11 years ago

        Another interesting point he makes =

        in societies that value 'intellectuals', they tend to create millions of 'supervisors' to 'help' the poor. Half the population is employed in 'administrating' the other half.

        In the US, he argues, our strength is the ability to leave people alone and let them do what they want, and consequently we have far more vastly 'diffused competence'

        e.g. "The vigor of a society should be measured by its ability to get along WITHOUT strong leaders."

    2. Derpetologist   11 years ago

      Seconded.

      "Failure in the management of practical affairs seems to be a qualification for success in the management of public affairs."

      "The opposite of the religious fanatic is not the fanatical atheist but the gentle cynic who cares not whether there is a god or not."

    3. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      And he never quit his day job (longshoreman).

      "Hey, Eric, wanna go down to the bar after work?"

      "I'd love to, but I need to explore the sociology of mass movements."

      "Ah, OK, have fun with that."

      "Thank you!"

      1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

        He was blind for 10 years after a fall at age 5.

        I bet this guy threw a knife into heaven and could kill with a stare.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7iVsdRbhnc

      2. Sevo   11 years ago

        Notorious G.K.C.|12.9.14 @ 10:32PM|#
        "And he never quit his day job (longshoreman)."

        I read "The True Believer" many years ago (as you might imagine) and can't remember a whole lot, except that he was not taken by socialist bullshit/dogma.
        Strangely, he was employed in an occupation dominated by a communist union; see Harry Bridges:
        "Bridges hewed to the Communist Party line throughout the late 1930s and 1940s. After the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact was signed in 1939, the party attacked Roosevelt and Churchill as warmongers and adopted the slogan "The Yanks Ain't Coming", Bridges denounced Roosevelt for betraying labor and preparing for war. John L. Lewis, the head of the CIO, responded in October 1939 by abolishing the position of West Coast director of the CIO, limiting Bridges' authority to California"
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Bridges

    4. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      "The Jew in Europe faced his enemies alone, an isolated individual, a speck of life floating in an eternity of nothingness. In [British-governed] Palestine, he felt himself not a human atom, but a member of an eternal race, with an immemorable past behind it and a breathtaking future ahead."

      *The True Believer,* Perennial Library, 1966, 63

    5. Hyperion   11 years ago

      This sort of makes sense to me. I have known some of the poor and I have been them. I come from a very poor family and lived part of my life growing up in Appalachia, although unlike a lot of people I knew then and still know, I escaped it fairly early on.

      I think to understand this, you have to live it.

      To this day, I still know some of these people who are very poor, but they seem to be, at least in their mind, a lot more free than I am. To put it bluntly, they don't give a fucking shit. Their poverty doesn't bother them. They don't want anything more. They don't have to work, they eat well, they drink all they want and do all the drugs they want and live the way they want. They never worry about their situation.

      For me, I'm caught in the situation of caring and I can't escape it. Not saying that I want to, but even if I did, I couldn't. So, being a middle/upper middle class guy through my own hard work, I constantly worry about finances and I like nice things that cost too much money.

      So yeah, those toothless hillbillies are, well might be more free than me, but it's the price you pay for giving a fuck.

      1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

        When I was in Tanzania, I was amazed by all the happy children I saw. Even the poorest of the poor who would dig through garbage to lick a candy bar wrapper were always smiling.

        1. Irish   11 years ago

          Well, that's probably because Tanzania doesn't have some of the social problems you see in other poor areas.

          A friend of mine went to Haiti for humanity work. Apparently there's not a lot of smiling in Port-au-Prince.

          1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

            One of the funnier things that happened to me there:

            I was late for lunch, so they told me to go to the school kitchen and the students working there would fix me a plate of leftovers.

            We got to talking about life and its hardships. One of them said "well, we just eat our ugali and wait for death."

            "You're pulling my leg aren't you?" I said.

            "Well....yeah."

            We all had a good laugh.

        2. Hyperion   11 years ago

          Blissful ignorance?

          Of course, that's not fair at all to say about children. It's a natural state for them. It's when they can remain that way well into adulthood that is amazing.

          If governments could bottle that shit and give it out for free, it would be their ultimate prize.

          Understanding of one's own situation, enough to care is the beginning of all suffering, bro. It's why we libertarians are so cynical.

  87. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    What a perceptive guy this Hoffer was!

    Hoffer noted that leaders of mass movements were often frustrated intellectuals, from Adolf Hitler in 20th Century Europe to Hong Xiuquan's failure to advance in the Chinese bureaucracy of the 19th Century.

    "It is probably true that business corrupts everything it touches. It corrupts politics, sports, literature, art, labor unions and so on. But business also corrupts and undermines monolithic totalitarianism. Capitalism is at its liberating best in a noncapitalist environment."

  88. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    "We are ready to die for an opinion but not for a fact: indeed, it is by our readiness to die that we try to prove the factualness of our opinion."

    This is similar to what ex-KGB propagandist Bezmenov said: there has never been anyone in history who gave their life for the truth of 2 + 2 = 4.

    http://youtu.be/SZnkULuWFDg?t=1h34s

    1. Stampede   11 years ago

      What a load of meaningless pablum. No one ever threatened to kill anyone over 2+2=4. Can't be a martyr without a murderer.

      If you define a fact as something indisputably true, then no shit, nobody's died for a fact because there's no reason to kill someone over stating the obvious.

      If you define a fact as something that is objectively either true or false, but which one it is is not obvious, then shitloads of people have died for facts. Thomas More, Giordano Bruno, etc.

      1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

        Bad examples.

        Thomas More died because he was a staunch Catholic and the king wasn't.

        Bruno died because he made some speculations that conflicted with church dogma.

        People never argue about things that are clearly true or false. They argue about things that might be true.

        See this essay for elaboration:

        http://www.paulgraham.com/say.html

  89. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    Another gem from Hoffer:

    "The monstrous evils of the twentieth century have shown us that the greediest money grubbers are gentle doves compared with money-hating wolves like Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler, who in less than three decades killed or maimed nearly a hundred million men, women, and children and brought untold suffering to a large portion of mankind."

    1. Hyperion   11 years ago

      Lenin, Stalin, and all the other leftists never hated wealth for themselves. They just hated that if there were a free market, that they themselves might not wind up on top of the money pile. Nothing about the modern left has changed in that regard.

  90. bliss   11 years ago

    Civilization annihilated; women bear brunt of devestation!

    Peru's environment minister, Manuel Pulgar-Vidal, said women suffer disproportionately from climate change impacts, including weather-linked disasters, and a lot can be learned from how they are coping in their homes and fields...
    "Men should advocate for women's interests (in the climate talks), but women should be at the table," said Susan McDade of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).

    1. Hyperion   11 years ago

      Peru's environment minister, Manuel Pulgar-Vidal, said women suffer disproportionately from climate change impacts, including weather-linked disasters

      Links with data, please, cunt.

      1. Irish   11 years ago

        Well, Hillary Clinton said women are the real victims when men die during war. So if men aren't even the primary victims in their own violent deaths, I can see how climate change wouldn't particularly affect them.

        1. Hyperion   11 years ago

          The climate change cult are becoming a parody of themselves.

          1. bliss   11 years ago

            Climate Change Gender Action Plan (ccGAP)

            When it comes to developing a ccGAP, there are four steps. The first is to 'take stock' of the country's current situation by analyzing the legislative and policy frameworks, initiatives and stakeholders, and assessing the technical capacity of the country to create a gender-responsive climate change policy. The second step involves 'leveling the playing field' by building the capacity of certain stakeholders to be able to engage in a meaningful way. For most, this means training on climate change for women and women's organization, as well as capacity-building sessions for government and environmental CSOs on the links between gender and climate change. The third step is creating a national workshop where stakeholders, such as governments, civil society, international organizations, academia, and donors are brought together to develop measures that will be included in the gender action plan.

            1. bliss   11 years ago

              cont

              Finally, the ccGAP goes through an official validation process to be approved by the Cabinet or the Ministry and put into action. In some cases, elements of the ccGAP have been included in the country's National Communications to the UNFCCC or in project proposals, such as Mozambique, which used its ccGAP to influence its Pilot Program for Climate Resilience under the World Bank's Climate Investment Funds.

              Is the ccGap as wide as the giGap(gender income)?

              1. bliss   11 years ago

                the second step involves 'leveling the playing field' by building the capacity of certain stakeholders to be able to engage in a meaningful way. For most, this means training on climate change for women and women's organization...

                Is the author saying women are stupid? They need to level the playing field by "training" women so that they can engage in a meaningful way?

                1. bliss   11 years ago

                  I guess that training pays off. From the link in my @ 11:59 post below:

                  Women's participation in decision making at higher levels has specifically benefitted environmental policy, such that countries with more women in their parliaments are more likely to set aside protected land areas and ratify international environmental treaties.

                  1. Sevo   11 years ago

                    bliss|12.10.14 @ 12:10AM|#
                    "I guess that training pays off. From the link in my @ 11:59 post below:

                    Women's participation in decision making at higher levels has specifically benefitted environmental policy, such that countries with more women in their parliaments are more likely to set aside protected land areas and ratify international environmental treaties."

                    I guess you're posting sarc, right?

            2. Hyperion   11 years ago

              The 3rd step involves going broke and becoming dependent on government after wasting a lot and time and money on worthless 'knowledge' which doesn't result in any real world skills.

              What a bunch of maroons.

    2. bliss   11 years ago

      um ... devastation.

      I know everyone will forgive a spelling mistake from a poster deeply distraught from encountering such terrible news.

      1. Irish   11 years ago

        I don't know why you're even here, instead of weeping forlornly in a corner for the ravages we have inflicted on the Earth Mother.

        1. bliss   11 years ago

          Hey, we might just make it after all!

          In Nepal, women farmers avoid crop failure in the face of changing weather patterns by growing off-season vegetables and bananas, which are more resilient to flood and drought (ActionAid, 2007). In Jordan, women's management of small-scale irrigation projects and involvement in water harvesting and soil conservation improves the efficiency of water use (Al-Naber & Shatanawi, 2003). In Tanzania, when men migrate from home for longer periods due to the impacts of climate change, women take over the role of livestock herding and pasture management (Matinda, 2010). In Nicaragua, following a disaster, women were actively involved in evacuating those at risk, transporting materials to clear roads, and organizing food collection brigades and health care campaigns (Delany & Shrader, 2000). Women often lead the way in adapting to climate change impacts, but they also play a key role in mitigating climate change by optimizing energy
          efficiency, using low-footprint energy sources and techniques,and influencing a household's and community's consumption patterns (Rojas, 2012).

          1. Hyperion   11 years ago

            Women often lead the way in adapting to climate change impacts, but they also play a key role in mitigating climate change by optimizing energy
            efficiency, using low-footprint energy sources and techniques,and influencing a household's and community's consumption patterns (Rojas, 2012).

            Word, dude. My wife often does this by doing laundry 3 times a day even though there's a nearly empty clothes hamper and no need for doing a load of laundry. Women are better at everything, football for example, and smarter too, which is why they keep bitching about not being able to get into STEM fields.

            1. Sevo   11 years ago

              ..."why they keep bitching about not being able to get into STEM fields."

              Well, my wife has a masters in engineering and amazingly enough, she doesn't bitch about getting into engineering *or* doing the laundry (we swap that duty).
              She's also a pretty good cook, but a real tyro at...
              You get the point...

              1. Hyperion   11 years ago

                My wife is a fantastic cook, and she has 3 degrees including 2 masters and a law degree and the equivalent of the bar from her country. I'm not in any way saying that women are not smart.

                I'm just saying that all of this women are better at everything is total bullshit.

      2. Sevo   11 years ago

        bliss|12.9.14 @ 11:13PM|#
        "um ... devastation.
        I know everyone will forgive a spelling mistake from a poster deeply distraught from encountering such terrible news."

        Care to give us a hint about that to which your comment refers?

        1. bliss   11 years ago

          My dog died.

          1. Sevo   11 years ago

            I just saw your amusing "Nepal" post. Sorry I missed it earlier. My goodness, what a pile of shit!
            I'm guessing you're posting sarc?

            1. Irish   11 years ago

              Yeah, the dog thing is obviously sarcastic.

              I like this bliss guy. He's got a well-cut jib.

              1. Sevo   11 years ago

                I'm waiting for the punchline.

  91. Irish   11 years ago

    Someone posted this article from the New Yorker which is a satiric mocking article about a 'libertarian police department.' People in the PM links seemed offended, but how can you not think this is funny?

    He turned. In his hand was a revolver that the Constitution said he had every right to own. He fired at me and missed. I pulled my own gun, put a quarter in it, and fired back. The bullet lodged in a U.S.P.S. mailbox less than a foot from his head. I shot the mailbox again, on purpose.

    "Why'd you do it?" I asked, as I slapped a pair of Oikos? Greek Yogurt Presents Handcuffs? on the guy.

    "Because I was afraid."

    "Afraid?"

    "Afraid of an economic future free from the pernicious meddling of central bankers," he said. "I'm a central banker."

    I wanted to coldcock the guy. Years ago, a central banker killed my partner. Instead, I shook my head.

    "Let this be a message to all your central-banker friends out on the street," I said. "No matter how many bitcoins you steal, you'll never take away the dream of an open society based on the principles of personal and economic freedom."

    That's hilarious. Given that I thought not being whiny, entitled bitches is what separated us from the progressives, I don't know why anyone had a problem with this.

    1. Sevo   11 years ago

      Someone linked that earlier, and the comments made it clear that no one and no dog got shot by the cop.
      If cops had to ay by the bullet, they might think twice.

  92. Hyperion   11 years ago

    So, has there been any discussion around here about Boehner's supposed attempt to give Obama one billion in tax payer money to support his 'amnesty' executive order?

    No idea how true it is. They are going nuts about it over at Dailycaller.

    Boehner gives Obama the goodies

    1. Sevo   11 years ago

      Hyperion|12.9.14 @ 11:28PM|#
      "So, has there been any discussion around here about Boehner's supposed attempt to give Obama one billion in tax payer money to support his 'amnesty' executive order?"

      I sure haven't seen a word about it, but there's a lot of 'reportedly(s)' in that link.
      I'll get more concerned when it's less vapor-ware.

      1. Hyperion   11 years ago

        I saw it first on Drudge, so I was of course immediately not too convinced of it's trustworthiness(at least as far as the real context of the story).

        I'm with you on not being so concerned yet. Just trying to get any details about the source of this.

    2. widget   11 years ago

      If the US annexed the Mali, the poorest country on earth, the US GNP would rise by the GNP of Mali. Hail Caplan! In the subsequent inclusion of Mali's citizens with the US welfare state, sales at Toys-R-Us would skyrocket. With a 5+ birth-to-woman ratio among the new americans, what could go wrong?

      1. Hyperion   11 years ago

        There was once this thing that someone said about giving us your poor and oppressed and/or something like that.

        What changed is the addition of the welfare state and the ensuing tipping point that this ensures.

      2. widget   11 years ago

        You don't think that way, no one could. That Bill Gates would set up a college scholarship fund that explicitly excluded white americans, the bulk of the demographic that made him rich, is unthinkable.

        1. Hyperion   11 years ago

          Oh, it's totally thinkable these days, in fact, most universities today think exactly like that. The world has went completely insane.

  93. Irish   11 years ago

    The first person to shake Jonathan Gruber's hand after the Congressional hearing was policy analyst and National Review contributor Phil Kerpen. He claims he said the following:

    Phil Kerpen
    Follow
    Right after hearing I shook Gruber's hand, looked him in the eye, and said:
    "Thank you for helping us destroy the shitty law you passed."

    American hero.

    1. Hyperion   11 years ago

      He's also an optimist. We're a long way from destroying the law or even getting rid of any of it.

      The war on the middle class shall continue without interruption.

      1. Sevo   11 years ago

        Hyperion|12.9.14 @ 11:51PM|#
        "He's also an optimist."

        Agreed, but I'm sorry I didn't get a chance to do and say the same thing.
        Looking him right in the eye as I did so...

        1. Hyperion   11 years ago

          He's also a little inaccurate in that, in that I don't think Gruber was in congress when that law was passed.

          Gruber's disgusting, but not nearly as disgusting as the members of congress, who are elected, and who are supposed to represent the best interest of their constituents in passing a piece of shit that they knew would fuck over most people for the benefit of a few.

          1. Stampede   11 years ago

            I really don't think most members of Congress understood the effects of the law. They bear responsibility for recklessly passing something they didn't understand, of course, but Gruber is a special kind of evil.

            1. Hyperion   11 years ago

              I really don't think most members of Congress understood the effects

              Since most of the electorate are obviously not intelligent enough to not elect people as their representatives, who are even dumber than they are, I think we need some serious amendments to the constitution.

              1. Stampede   11 years ago

                If the Constitution can't deal with stupid people it's doomed to begin with.

                It was the impulsive nature of the US electorate that made Obamacare possible, not stupidity. They really didn't like the GOP and wanted to punish them.

                1. Hyperion   11 years ago

                  If the Constitution can't deal with stupid people it's doomed to begin with

                  There's been an intentional dumbing down of the public through public schools, a progressive policy, for decades now.

                  Leftists now completely control our public education system. Do you think that they want anyone knowing about the constitution?

                  I'm not talking about not letting people vote if that's what you think. I'm thinking more about requirements that legislation cannot be hidden inside other legislation and that bills are required to be posted online, accessible to everyone for, let's say 90 days, in their FINAL form before they can be voted on.

                  1. JeremyR   11 years ago

                    Can you even blame the schools?

                    Tonight Obama was on the Daily Show (or Colbert, one of them) defending Obamacare, and the audience lapped it up.

                    1. Hyperion   11 years ago

                      Can you even blame the schools?

                      Yes, all of the morons you are talking about are products of the schools.

                      Leftists are not taught to think. They are taught to let their masters think for them, give them their talking points, and agree. That is all.

                    2. Sevo   11 years ago

                      "Tonight Obama was on the Daily Show (or Colbert, one of them) defending Obamacare, and the audience lapped it up"

                      The audiences on lefty TV shows are self selected.
                      Ever see the clip of Hitch flipping off Stewart's audience? Ha, ha, Bush joke! Turd would laugh at it.

          2. Sevo   11 years ago

            I didn't see the claim that he was. But then neither were the staff who wrote the damn thing along with Gruber.

            1. Hyperion   11 years ago

              the shitty law you passed

              You have to be a voting member of congress to pass a law.

              I'm not saying that what he said was not ballsy, which is sorely lacking everywhere in society these days.

              1. Sevo   11 years ago

                Yeah, he didn't vote on it, but he 'passed' it in that he lied through his teeth to make it passable.
                Mao didn't 'kill' people, either.

              2. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

                You have to be a voting member of congress to pass a law.

                There's another definition of 'passed' that works in this case. As in, the law that Gruber shat out.

              3. VG Zaytsev   11 years ago

                You have to be a voting member of congress to pass a law.

                There's another definition of 'passed' that works in this case. As in, the law that Gruber shat out.

          3. Stampede   11 years ago

            "You crossed the line first, Tea Party. You squeezed them, you hammered them to the point of desperation. And in their desperation, they turned to a man they didn't fully understand."

      2. Irish   11 years ago

        I know. But I would have wanted to say something like that too, just to see the look as his smug, prick face drooped a little.

  94. Sevo   11 years ago

    OK, the vid's been used (WELL) a lot, but we now have "Gruberagedon!"
    "Hitler Finds Out Field Marshal Gruber Spilled the Beans "
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKhkQqA53v0
    Thrill as (whoever is acting as) Hitler goes ballistic!

  95. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    The Passion of the Gruber:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwja8Ff6DDo

    1. Hyperion   11 years ago

      Fuck, the guy sounds like he's getting a giant wedgie, lol. That is a total destruction and yet, sadly, nothing will come of this.

      1. Sevo   11 years ago

        I hope you're wrong.
        NBC finally admitted to its audience this evening that someone named Gruber exists and in fact the story was not dismissive.
        I don't know how old you are; Nixon's lies were ignored by quite a bit of what was known as "the press" at the time. Not forever.
        It can happen that a lying POS is finally called on it and made to pay for it.

        1. Hyperion   11 years ago

          I think I was maybe 13 when Nixon resigned.

          A lot has changed since then. Nothing will happen to this guy.

    2. Derpetologist   11 years ago

      And St Gruber went to the Garden of Derpsemene to pray. He fell to knees and prayed "Oh Obama, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me. Yet not as I will, but as you will."

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0da4PjaS90A

      1. Hyperion   11 years ago

        A few eggs have to be broken to make the perfect socialist omelet, comrade.

        1. Hyperion   11 years ago

          AND.NOTHING.ELSE.HAPPENED.

  96. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    And St Gruber went before the governor Derpius Pilate. Therefore Pilate entered again into the Praetorium, and summoned Gruber and said to Him, "Are You the King of the Progs?" Gruber answered, "Are you saying this on your own initiative, or did others tell you about Me?" Pilate answered, "I am not a Prog, am I? Your own nation and the chief priests delivered You to me; what have You done?" Gruber answered, "My microsimulation model is not of this world.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IqfGxzG8VM

  97. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    Those who had arrested Gruber took him to Issa the high priest, where the teachers of the law and the elders had assembled. But Gruber's lawyer followed him at a distance, right up to the courtyard of the high priest. He entered and sat down with the guards to see the outcome.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mR8jvkBm2w

  98. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    It was now about noon, and darkness came over the whole land until three in the afternoon, for the sun stopped shining. And the curtain of the House Oversight Committee was torn in two. Gruber called out with a loud voice, "Mr. Chairman, into your hands I plead the 5th." When he had said this, he breathed his last.

    The proggy journalist, seeing what had happened, praised Obama and said, "Surely this was a righteous man."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jawoOSJGx6U

    1. Sevo   11 years ago

      Derp, I predicted youtube content was gonna grow; no time now, tomorrow morning is a good time for a laugh at Gruber.

  99. Hyperion   11 years ago

    I can't believe that Shreeky hasn't been here yet to declare this yet another fake scandal.

    Oh well, I'm sure he'll be along tomorrow to do as much.

    I wonder if he is busy yet building himself a Hillary shrine and bowing down to lick some cankles. Ewww...

    1. ronaldbarrkem   11 years ago

      My Aunty Mila recently got a nine month old Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 just by parttime work from a computer...
      Try this web-site ::::: http://www.jobsfish.com

  100. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

    +1.111 octopi

  101. F. Stupidity, Jr.   11 years ago

    Shit, I meant 1.125. #mathfail

  102. Buddy Bizarre   11 years ago

    Give him time. He's still recovering from UK style welfare state.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump Is Openly Using the Presidency To Enrich the Trump Brand

Matt Welch | 8.1.2025 5:00 PM

A Cop Lied, Fabricated a Sex-Trafficking Case, and Jailed a Teen on False Charges—and Still Can't Be Sued

Billy Binion | 8.1.2025 4:49 PM

Shattering Norms: Federal Immigration Agents Aren't Afraid to Smash Your Car Window

Autumn Billings | 8.1.2025 4:01 PM

Hiking Tariffs on Canada, Trump Demands 'Adequate Steps' To Achieve an Impossible Drug War Goal

Jacob Sullum | 8.1.2025 3:20 PM

The National Debt Is Becoming Your Local Problem

Mariana Trujillo | 8.1.2025 12:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!