Police Abuse

N.H. Cop Involved in Ridiculous and Deadly Drug Bust Could Get Job Back Despite Being Fired for Pattern of Misconduct


Joseph Kelly

Last year, Officer Joseph Kelley of the Weare Police Department in New Hampshire supervised a drug bust where cops lured a man high on cocaine and heroin to the main thoroughway in town to bust him buying drugs, and then shot and killed him when, they say, he sped his car toward them.

Earlier this year the attorney general's office in New Hampshire decided it did not have enough evidence to prosecute anyone involved in the shooting—among the office's complaints were that cops provided conflicting testimony.

Nevertheless, the attorney general's office and the Weare police chief criticized Kelley for the poor judgment in setting up the drug bust. Kelley went on medical leave for stress related to the shooting. Kelley was fired a few months later after a separate investigation found him lying on time cards, writing bad checks, and getting co-workers to lie, but now, the Concord Monitor reports, Kelley could get his job back after the city decided to rescind his termination by the police chief:

Tom Clow, chairman of the Weare Board of Selectmen, declined to comment on the decision. He said Sunday that the board planned to meet with Broth last night, at which time Kelley's name "may or may not" come up.

The town, which has struggled for months to rebuild the image of its beleaguered police force, is also dealing with domestic violence allegations against its police chief, John Velleca. Velleca, who was hired last fall and who requested Kelley's termination in November, has been placed on paid administrative leave.

It's not clear whether the timing of those claims played any part in the decision to rescind Kelley's termination.

Broth's letter was sent to King and Erin DeRenzis, assistant general counsel for AFSCME Council 93, which represents Weare police officers. In it, he states that the board continues to "expressly" deny any wrongdoing, and that its decision was made "to avoid the time, expense and inconvenience that arise from an arbitration hearing."

Kelley may no get his job back. While the city awarded his back pay (based on him being on worker's compensation for the stress) and rescinded his termination, the city indicated if he returned to work the police department would re-open the internal investigation into the fatal drug bust.

Kelley was previously involved in a case that reached the First Circuit Court of Appeals, after he arrested Carla Gericke for, among other things, recording him (with a camera that didn't work). Prosecutors dropped charges against Gericke but she sued for retaliatory prosecution and violation of her First Amendment rights. The court ruled Kelley couldn't do what he did. That incident was in 2010.

NEXT: Poll: Eric Holder Slightly Less Hated Than Sebelius

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. If I were ever to be arrested for something, this is the kind of cop I want to be arrested by. His testimony carries about as much weight as an African Swallow, and a decent defense attorney would tear him apart.

    1. After which the jury would still convict because the word of a police officer is gold.

  2. Promote that man!

  3. “to avoid the time, expense and inconvenience that arise from an arbitration hearing.”

    Those cop-friendly Southern states and their union contracts!

    Wait, New Hampshire?

  4. Kelley may no get his job back.

    You start drinking early or something, Ed?

  5. Dunphy approves, because all firings of policemen are wrong.

    1. No, he says that arbitration agreements negotiated by unions are necessary to protect cops who are wrongly accused by their bosses of using excessive force against suspects!

      1. Oh yeah. And as a person who trains cops in the use of force, he is positive that all uses of force are justified.

        1. Strictly speaking, he doesn’t go that far.

          Yet even when he says the cop was wrong, he gets more indignant at the cops’ H&R critics than at the misbehavior law officer.

          1. Well yeah. Those cops who do wrong are a tiny minority. Such a minority that you should assume that any cop you meet is a good cop. A wonderful cop. Like him. A cop who will beat you like a dog if you fail to show sufficient respect. So just show respect and everything will be fine.

  6. In any private sector job “lying on one time card” = “out the door and don’t come back.”

    a drug bust where cops lured a man high on cocaine and heroin to the main thoroughway in town to bust him buying drugs

    “But, but, that’s the way they do it on realty teevee.”

  7. “expressly” deny any wrongdoing, and that its decision was made “to avoid the time, expense and inconvenience that arise from an arbitration hearing.”

    Jesus, now we’re stuck with dangerous, lying, murderous police officers because we can’t afford to fire them?

  8. All is well. Folks will pull their funding from that violent service, and employ another private firm that doesn’t go around shooting people, and violating the rights of individuals.

    The individuals of the former department would be a risk to any company, and they wouldn’t get hired by anyone who values getting continued business. Their continued violent actions would be met with self defense to where they wouldn’t make it home.

    Wait…………..the police are funded through extortion. If individuals tried to pull funding for that department (or any for that matter), the politicians would send that same department to confiscate their shit, and if those individuals resist those thugs in blue costumes would kill them.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.