Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Tonight on The Independents: The War on War

Matt Welch | 8.29.2014 7:49 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Friday night episodes of The Independents (Fox Business Network, 9 p.m. ET, 6 p.m. PT, with re-airs three hours and five hours later) are organized around a single theme. Tonight's theme is "The War on War." That is, the show is talking about phrases that begin with "The war on…," and, well, declaring our own war against the promiscuous usage thereof.

Fittingly, the conversation starts off with a discussion of the actual war-related content, as in, what exactly is "The War on Terror," should we still be fighting it, and is it time for a new name/emphasis? Joining to ponder that question in light of recent ISIL-flavored events is former Reagan-administration deputy defense secretary K.T. McFarland and retired Col. David Hunt.

Next, to tackle the war metaphor head-on, is Cato Executive Vice President David Boaz. What do Democrats mean when they say there's a "War on Women," and what do Republicans do to further that impression? Hadley Heath Manning, director of health care policy at the Independent Women's Forum, will give her 77 cents.

Reason readers certainly know about the horrific consequences of the "War on Drugs"; helping FBN viewers through this policy thicket is longtime former vice cop and current board chair of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition Jack Cole. The War on Drugs is part of a larger "War on Crime," which in 2014 seems ripe for long-overdue reform. One of the broad shoulders on that particular wheel belongs to Chuck DeVore, vice president of the Texas Public Policy Foundation.

Is there really a "War on Christmas"? Fox News radio host John Gibson certainly thinks so; he'll be on to defend his pet metaphor. Then the co-hosts will assess LBJ's "War on Poverty" a half-century on. You people will enjoy this television program.

Follow The Independents on Facebook at facebook.com/IndependentsFBN, follow on Twitter @ independentsFBN, and click on this page for more video of past segments.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Jesse Benton, Former Ron Paul Campaign Manager, Resigns From Mitch McConnell Re-Election Bid Days After Revelations Paul Campaign Bribed Iowa State Senator for Support

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsWorldWar on DrugsCultureCivil LibertiesPolicyThe IndependentsWarWar on TerrorWar on WomenWar Powers ActCriminal JusticeDrugs
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (132)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Tonight's theme is "The War on War.

    Does that mean we can suspend everyone's constitutional rights and take their tax payments to arm ourselves to the teeth?

    1. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

      So.. become the police?

    2. Rev-Match   11 years ago

      arm ourselves to the teeth

      Does that mean I get my own Apache? (I'd settle for an M1A1)

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Hello.

      What about the war on interruptions?

      1. Rev-Match   11 years ago

        Kennedy's all over it.

    4. Marshall Gill   11 years ago

      arm ourselves to the teeth

      You mean there are those among us who are not already?

  2. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    Ohio abortion clinic closes, enemies of the First Amendment hardest hit:

    "For months, anti-choice extremists have targeted the doctors at Complete Healthcare for Women because they provided their patients with abortion care in addition to their other obstetric and gynecological services. These doctors have been harassed at their practice, leaflets calling them "killers" have been distributed in their neighborhood and protesters have picketed a hospital where they have admitting privileges. I would not be surprised if this campaign of harassment played a role in their decision to stop providing abortion care to their patients. No one should face this harassment for providing constitutionally protected health care services."

    http://www.prochoiceohio.org/m.....0828.shtml

    1. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

      You know, I'm pro-choice, but even I feel a little schadenfreude when an abortion clinic closes due to public pressure because so damn many pro-choice activists are fucking disgusting.

      It doesn't make a lot of sense, I guess, but there it is.

    2. Derpetologist   11 years ago

      abortion care?

      Wah?

      1. GILMORE   11 years ago

        "abortion care"

        they nurse the abortions to adulthood

        Where do you think Tony came from?

        1. Bobarian (dinosaur hunter)   11 years ago

          "Where do you think Tony came from?"

          A bird shit on a post?

    3. Rev-Match   11 years ago

      constitutionally protected health care services

      Umm...what? (I know, I know, they think healthcare (which must be provided by another person through a voluntary transaction) is a right).

      P.s.
      It's a parentheses within a parentheses!

  3. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    I have a new exhibit in my traveling Freak Show of Derp. Behold the monstrosity that is Dave Sirota!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOK0GJAOmUs

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywDuCEIeHnM

    1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

      Count the fallacies with Sirota:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2LJzEuodZw

      1. montana mike   11 years ago

        Sirota is a brainless (to put it nicely) progtard. He's the annoying dolt you knew as a freshman in college who suddenly decided he alone can save the world. Slightly less stupid than Amy Goodman.

        To imply tha Bloomberg and Gates are raping the public schools for PROFIT is hilarious. Whatever you think about those dudes, they don't need more money...that newspapers actually print this idjit on their op ed pages explains a lot about their impending doom. I'm sure there is someone out there in the policy world that is stupider but I've not encountered them yet.

    2. GILMORE   11 years ago

      I saw, "Radio talk show host"

      that was enough. Those people are like Derp-Catfish. They feed off of it. Radio people exaggerate the retarded elements of themselves because that's why people listen to their shows.

      1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

        I read that the pleasure center of the brain responds the same to favorable opinions as it does to food, drugs, or sex.

    3. Sudden   11 years ago

      Sirota certainly has a tendency for frothing rage debating. But in fairness to him, his point regarding opposition to the president claiming the authority to execute American citizens abroad is spot on, and was something that was not addressed by his debating opposition.

  4. GILMORE   11 years ago

    "what exactly is "The War on Terror," should we still be fighting it, and is it time for a new name/emphasis?"

    Trick question: The author already believes that whatever the definition, the answer to the following questions is, "no, and Intervention"

    i dislike the way everything is framed such that there is an inevitable preconceived answer of:

    "shit is complicated and we might as well dismiss everything as more trouble than its worth rather than deal with the minutiae and end up coming to uncomfortable conclusions which may run afoul of our political leanings"

    There needs to be a better framework that allows for people to retain their positions *while* dealing with the details.

    Example = hawks like to frame things in the context of a new "cold war": the 'enemy is everywhere, constantly changing - therefore, there are/should be no limits to the security state or efforts to eradicate the threats". Something like that.

    you need to take their framework apart.

    1) Islamic terrorism is not (like the Soviets) an 'existential threat'.
    2) endless war poses an 'existential threat' to American liberty
    3) the threat posed by islamic terrorism is one that can be confined and dealt with on a case by case basis rather than with the "open ended war" metaphor.
    4) we should engage in multilateral efforts to both limit (rather than eliminate) threats, and provide incentives for Arab nations to stop supporting proxy islamist movements.

    1. The Immaculate Trouser   11 years ago

      Knocked it out of the park. While we're at it, as a tangential point one loses credibility by not describing situations accurately; defending Russian tyrants or Venezuelan socialists is not a good way of convincing the people one is trying to convince of the integrity of your other claims (and no, not all libertarians in print do that but a significant portion of them do).

    2. Derpetologist   11 years ago

      The problem is there are almost no politicians who want to do what is necessary, namely:

      1. Ending aid to Israel

      2. Withdrawing military forces from the Middle East.

      3. Profiling at airports, as the Israelis do

      4. Ending support for Muslim dictators

      Any one of those things would greatly reduce the risk of terrorism.

      1. GILMORE   11 years ago

        i doubt any of the above would achieve what you think of as 'risk reduction'.

        Even were 1,2,4 all done overnight - we'd still end up in a position of backstopping security for 'the kingdom' by some means or another.

        The 5th fleet exists in order to keep oil coming out of the gulf.

        To some degree, we are policing against the possibility of a long term Iranian/Saudi cold war becoming a hot one.

        None of the things mentioned above affect that in any way.

        Any critics of this particular status quo need to consider what the potential alternatives are and how bad they could actually be, before passing judgement on how awful this is.

        1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

          Why do we need to prop up Saudi Arabia? For oil?

          To hell with that.

          1. GILMORE   11 years ago

            Well if you have theories on how a Bicycle-Centric economy would work out for everyone in the developing world, i'm open to hearing about it.

            1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

              Suppose another hard-line Islamic govt takes over Saudi Arabia like in Iran. Those guys aren't going to stop selling oil, just as the Iranians didn't.

              1. Jensen   11 years ago

                The Saudi's supposedly have their refineries wired with explosives. A regime change could be...problematic.

                1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

                  Saddam torched the wells in Kuwait and they were fixed.

                  1. Jensen   11 years ago

                    Yeah, and it was a huge shit show for a country the size of New Hampshire. What happens when oil fields several thousand times that size go up? I'm just sayin'.

                    1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

                      I see your point.

    3. Sudden   11 years ago

      I'd argue that Islamism is indeed an existential threat, albeit one that is less threatening than Soviet communism was (although it's worth noting that it's gaining ground, both literally and figuratively).

      But the Islamist worldview is indeed at odds with the very existence of limited constitutional govt and protection of minority rights.

      1. GILMORE   11 years ago

        by that coin, the Progressive Worldview is equally so, and presents a far more realistic threat than 'Looming Sharia Law' taking hold in the US.

        1. Sudden   11 years ago

          In the immediate term, I agree (also worth noting that I generally agree with points 2-4 you raised).

          Islamism isn't about playing for the immediate term though. They've got the long view in their sights.

      2. The Immaculate Trouser   11 years ago

        Disagree. Islamism is effectively a regional threat in the parts of the world with a significant (30% or more) Muslim population. There is no country with such a population in the Western Hemisphere, and every country with such a population must cross the Atlantic Ocean to reach us, without anything like a developed land or naval force to confront our own (which last I checked, is still overwhelmingly dominant esp in the ocean). Unlike communism, it has zero appeal to non-Muslims and there is no threat of it creating a power which can influence other nations to kowtow to it. Islamism is often (though not always) linked to some variant of socialism or atuarky, which virtually guarantees poverty and a lack of industrialization in an Islamist state. At worst, they can kick over our sandcastles in the Middle East, fuck up oil markets and sponsor occasional acts of terrorism -- harmful, but not an existential threat.

        Push comes to shove, we can always limit emigration from problem areas and pressure other countries in the Western Hemisphere to do the same.

        1. Sudden   11 years ago

          Unlike communism, it has zero appeal to non-Muslims

          It may have zero appeal to non-Muslims, but its strategy for gaining a foothold in the West is partly by conversion of the disaffected groups to Islam. It being perceived as a movement gaining in strength and having a cohesive ideology can appeal to and has already attracted converts from marginalized communities.

    4. Matt Welch   11 years ago

      I'm more open-ended than you give me credit for here; also, I think you will find the discussion less loaded than you think.

      1. GILMORE   11 years ago

        yeah, i know.

        I see chops, i bust them. its a weakness i have.

        1. Rev-Match   11 years ago

          I see chops, i bust them.

          Start busting his chops for not posting a live thread on Thursdays for 'Stossel'.

  5. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    I have unearthed a new rich vein of derp: Ann Coulter vs. Whoopi Goldberg on racism.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0Hb80gki_E

    1. Dances-with-Trolls   11 years ago

      Speaking of Skeletor I just saw this come across Lucy S.. omethingorother's twitter feed:

      Lucy Somethingorother
      But Mark Ames taught me that the TSA backlash was libertarian astroturf. 🙁
      ?
      Ann Coulter @AnnCoulter
      If libertarian attacks on cops had any purpose other than getting liberals to like them, once in awhile, they'd mention a TSA agent.

      1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

        So Coulter never reads Reason then.

        Huh. Prepare the Fainting Couch and fetch the smelling salts, post haste!

    2. Sevo   11 years ago

      Derpetologist|8.29.14 @ 8:28PM|#
      "I have unearthed a new rich vein of derp: Ann Coulter vs. Whoopi Goldberg on racism."

      Is there some sort of a filter where I can just listen to the incoherent screaming.

  6. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    I think my derp theme for the evening will be progs trying to violently squelch protest:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKe14jtpbbY

    1. Sudden   11 years ago

      So she's irate at the use of photos of a "poor dying fucking fetus" because "it's not that simple" and "you have no fucking idea what it takes for people to make these fucking decisions."

      All of this seems to fit rather neatly into the pro-life narrative that a fetus is indeed life, and as such worthy of protection. If this were merely a ball of cells with no underlying humanity, there would be no wrestling with moral quandry and no offense taken to the discarded ball of cells. It would indeed be that "fucking simple."

      She exposed herself more than the protestors could ever dream: someone who believes that killing is acceptable if it aids the convenience of your own life, and no amount of guilt or pensive self-reflection can alter the fact that such a mentality is the purview of monsters.

      1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

        Did someone say "clump of cells"?

        Because that's the MAGIC WORD!

        HA HA! HE HE!

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g67z_xBe07Q

        1. Sudden   11 years ago

          I remember that video a month or two ago. It's even more deliciously meta in light of Burger King's recent decision to relocate corporate HQ to the Queen's realm.

    2. Rev-Match   11 years ago

      This is LIFE and it's not that fucking simple! - violent prog

      Well, yea. That's what the abortion protestors were kinda getting at.
      Also, it was obviously the abortion protestor's fault that violent prog acted violently. I mean, she was TRIGGERED, after all.

  7. Sevo   11 years ago

    Well, if you haven't had the pleasure of watching a pro at work, you're out of luck!

    "Chelsea Clinton quits as NBC News reporter"
    [...]
    "Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton's daughter had been working at the network since 2011, sporadically doing feature stories on people or organizations doing public-spirited work. Politico magazine reported earlier this year that NBC was paying her $600,000 a year."
    http://www.sfgate.com/entertai.....ertainment

    The $660K sure wasn't for her looks, so it must have been for her professional delivery, right?

    1. GILMORE   11 years ago

      Ouch.

      For christs sake, is anyone going to argue that kind of salary *isnt* baksheesh to the next-potential President?

      meanwhile, we're told that we don't have *enough regulations* preventing this sort of thing.

      1. Sevo   11 years ago

        "For christs sake, is anyone going to argue that kind of salary *isnt* baksheesh to the next-potential President?"

        I'm too lazy to look for it right now, but there's some tech-bucks guy in CA using his money to fight against anonymous money in politics.
        So, yeah, I'm sure he, being a lefty, would require this to be reported. Right? Right?

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

          600K?

          For HER?

          And to think true journalists live pay check to pay check.

          1. Sevo   11 years ago

            Just wool-gathering:
            Imagine if one of Bush's kids ended up as a "reporter" on one of the news broadcasting stations at $600K.
            I have a feeling that a $600K (my mistake above) salary would get screaming attention from the lefty press.

            1. PapayaSF   11 years ago

              Indeed. And I've noticed how Democrats tend to get huge book advances, that often never pay off.

            2. Cdr Lytton   11 years ago

              Uh, I don't know how much she makes but NBC also hired Jenna Bush Hager several year ago, too.

  8. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    Holy crap, this is funny- gay marriage activist vs. black conservative

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cT9TwDiYrL8

  9. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Prediction: Black.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Always bet on black.

      *Give yourself a pat if you know the movie.

      1. The Immaculate Trouser   11 years ago

        I know we're libertarian, but FFS we aren't all nerds. Darth Vader quotes aren't that awesome

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

          You don't get to pat yourself on the back.

          Not a Darth Vader quote.

          1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

            Everyone knows it's Snipes on a Plane.

            1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

              Ding, ding, ding!

              Or as my friend called it: Black man on a plane who beats up everyone.

              Pat, pat, pat.

              1. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

                "I HAVE HAD IT WITH THESE MOTHERFUCKING SNIPES ON THIS MOTHERFUCKING PLANE!"

                Another great quote from the movie.

  10. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    Flabby, belligerent man & shrieking woman harass Christian protester at gay rally:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzS-QuSttfs

    Things get interesting at the 2:26 mark.

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      It's like when those prochoice protesters tried to mingle with the prolife protesters, and the prolifers attacked the prochoicers and ripped away their signs and threw them to the ground...

      Well, technically that isn't true, but it's *emotionally* true, and that's what matters.

      http://saturdaychores.tumblr.com/

  11. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    War on wardrobes.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    You know who else was named Hitler?

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Adolf?

    2. Homple   11 years ago

      Alois?

    3. Sevo   11 years ago

      Well, Eva may have been for several hours.

      1. Sevo   11 years ago

        Hey, look here!
        "Eva Anna Paula Hitler was the longtime companion of Adolf Hitler and, for less than 40 hours, his wife."
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eva_Braun

        OK, so it's Wiki, but...

    4. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      Eva Braun, during the last few minutes of her life?

    5. Winston   11 years ago

      Paula?

  13. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    What. The. Eff.

    One of the panelists isn't even here?

  14. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Drugs attacked me. Drugs attacked me. We need war.

  15. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Wait.

    Aren't the Hatfield and McCoy clans still at war with each other?

    Or is it the Hatrocks vs. the Gruesomes?

    I forget.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    How about a war on fake books.

  17. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Arab sandals?

    Oh dear me.

    RACIST!

  18. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    We can't kill em all? Does that mean Allah also can't sort em out?

    1. Rev-Match   11 years ago

      Does that mean Allah also can't sort em out?

      Not enough virgins...

  19. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Lisa Cutnrunnedy Montgomery.

  20. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    I'm sure the Col. is impressed that you're impressed, Kennedy. I think I prefer it when you interrupt.

  21. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    America's default position is missionary.

  22. Rev-Match   11 years ago

    missionary mission

    This is my favorite mission. (I also like 'Cowgirl' Mission)

  23. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    War on everything. It's scandalous. I dub it War-tergate!

  24. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Put up with? I demand restrictions on my liberty if it means winning whatever.

  25. Winston   11 years ago

    You Know Who Else wanted a war to end wars?

  26. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    War on progressives!

    Who's with me?!

  27. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    I can get you all marching off to war.

    Battle Hymn of the Republic:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSiVjlknuSw

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      Don't Tread on Me

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZv_lvvIVoI

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

        Marine Hymn:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJlNw0myBG4

        1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

          And of course the Montenegrin National Anthem:

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPtPjMdtofk

    2. Rev-Match   11 years ago

      My response: Dixie

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKMTu1GDi_w

      1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

        Union version of Dixie:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5ra9cXx1-o

        1. Rev-Match   11 years ago

          I've heard it, and I find it to be antithetical to the concept of Consent of the Governed.

          1. Derpetologist   11 years ago

            I just think the lyrics are funny. I'd love to hear a Rebel parody of the Battle Hymn of the Republic. This is not it, but it's still pretty good:

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWgsdexkv18

            1. Rev-Match   11 years ago

              That was pretty funny.

  28. GILMORE   11 years ago

    Phallusy?

  29. GILMORE   11 years ago

    The Independents Attire Review, 29 August 2014

    "I Bet You're a Big Lee Marvin Fan"-Edition

    - Kennedy: Black: We've referenced 'Metallica'/Wicca/Mummenshantz/and 'Ballet Instructor' fantasies... what's left? ah, so. Ninja-Kennedy? her lightening interruptions stun unsuspecting guests into submission. While I think there's probably a place for something Black in the Host repertoire, we're still kind of missing something with the presentation here. We continue to endorse upping the ante to a full-on Ramones T: if Kmele can get freaky, I see nothing stopping other guests.

    - Matt: Best so far in the quest for 'Blue on Blue on Blue' perfection. If Power-Matt is the #1 with red-tie/white shirt, this makes for a good alternate that produces the same effect. There's a reason politicians have latched onto these formulae for their respective parties. Matt could add to his darker-blue tie roster here and continue to build on a very good thing.

    - Kmele: Reverend Kmele Davis-Aloysious-Washington-Foster of the First Gospel Church of the Reformed Abyssinian Libertarian Baptist Choir will later be leading us tonight in a vigorous rendition of "When The Praises Go Up, The Blessings Come Down". The hanky here needs to be ridiculously enlarged so as to be readily available for sweat-mopping. Everything else is daptastic.

    Ashoge

    1. GILMORE   11 years ago

      in case anyone isn't hip to the aforementioned gospel standard.

      this is how it goes

      I think there's like 5000 versions of that on Youtube. Its a popular one.

  30. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    If you have a penis you don't get to talk about rape or uteruses.

  31. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Kmele Foster: Don't talk shit about entitlements!

  32. Rev-Match   11 years ago

    Women are perfectly capable of...

    SEXIST!

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Perfectly capable of what?

      Finish the sentence!

      Blow jobs? Hand jobs? Dirty jobs?

      1. Rev-Match   11 years ago

        All of those jobs, and more!

  33. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Women are capable and responsible? Someone might want to tell them that.

  34. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Hadley got to have the last word, unless you count all of Kennedy's there at the end.

  35. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    Did Welch just interrupt a guest?

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

      Yes.

      But he gets a pass.

      He had a question. Not a soliloquy to express.

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

        Fair enough.

  36. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    So this guy benefited from the drug war then and he's benefiting from it now!

  37. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    WHAT.

    A.

    RACKET.

    No kidding cops and prosecutors are abusing this war.

  38. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Is the sun still up in Texas? Because if not, I suspect this episode is a...

    PRETAPE!

  39. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Drugs are bad? Even penicillin?

  40. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    Useful idiots rabble-rabble:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaYIYa54CSA

  41. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    What would the Baby Jesus do?

  42. GILMORE   11 years ago

    Whats with all this christmas-mocking-blasphemery?

    Merrying anyone outside of the 12 days is a Coal-Worthy abomination

  43. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    When something is banned, it's done so ultimately at the point of a gun. THAT'S AN ACT OF WAR!

  44. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    "We needed some levity and smarts."

    Ouch for the other guests.

  45. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    Of course these are religious symbols - duh!

    Let the complainers put up their own symbols, assuming (a big assumption) that they're not just trolling.

  46. AuH20   11 years ago

    So, I was in the area yesterday, and I made a reservation with Rush Street in Culver City for The LA Reasonoid Football Kickoff Meetup*

    So, don't be douchebags and leave me hanging. I know asking you guys not to be douchebags is like asking a wasp not to sting you, but... still, don't be.

    Anyway, Rush Street, Culver City (on Culver Blvd), Sunday, September 7th, 11 AM.

    *You do not have to watch football

  47. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    Where do we get that poverty line in the first place? THE GOVERNMENT.

  48. Derpetologist   11 years ago

    Try as I might, I cannot find any videos of pro-choice folks being civil with pro-life protesters:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpcInX_ukIE

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

      It's just an off-duty cop, watering the protesters.

      Too bad he didn't have an extendable pocket hose.

  49. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    AH! War from Lou Dobbs.

  50. GILMORE   11 years ago

    Shazaaam! DOBBS

    The Mexican-Terrorist nexxus is something he has yearned for now for decades, and finally his dreams are coming to fruition.

    ISIS-in-Juarez IS REAL!!

    1. ant1sthenes   11 years ago

      So, the story I read said they were planning to set off car bombs somewhere near the border....

      What the hell is on the border that anyone would give a shit about? That alone makes me question it.

      Unless maybe they want it to be clear that lax border enforcement caused it, in order to create a civil war in the US, or to get Republicans elected to push the US toward ground war? But that's assuming some deep chessmaster shit from a group whose main asset seem to be living so far past the moral event horizon that they're constantly underestimated.

  51. Rev-Match   11 years ago

    FoxBusiness...DOT COM

    "You're using an unneeded 'F'!" (or something)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6yksaCcR4s

  52. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    I know we give a lot of grief to the folks here but I do like these themed shows.

    1. GILMORE   11 years ago

      seconded

  53. GILMORE   11 years ago

    FYI

    Radley Balko on Vice = 40min interview with the maestro of militarized cops

  54. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Bobarian should be pleased we crashed through 100 comments easy.

    I've seen as many as 12 000 in Yahoo articles though.

    We should try and set a Guinness world record here at Reason for most comments on a thread.

    1. Winston   11 years ago

      We should try and set a Guinness world record here at Reason for most comments on a thread.

      If you really want a lot of comments then just let Mary Stack loose. Back in her White Indian days she would cause 1000 comments-plus Weekend threads.

    2. SIV   11 years ago

      Wait for late Oct 2016:

      "The libertarian case for Elizabeth Warren"

      1000+ comments easy

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections

Autumn Billings | 6.2.2025 5:30 PM

Harvard International Student With a Private Instagram? You Might Not Get a Visa.

Emma Camp | 6.2.2025 4:57 PM

J.D. Vance Wants a Free Market for Crypto. What About Everything Else?

Eric Boehm | 6.2.2025 4:40 PM

Trump's Attack on the Federalist Society Is a Bad Omen for Originalism

Damon Root | 6.2.2025 3:12 PM

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!