Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Civil Liberties

San Diego Cops Say Detaining, Photographing Strippers Just Part of Their Job

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 7.18.2014 5:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Cheetah Gentleman's Club San Diego/Facebook
(Cheetah Gentleman's Club San Diego/Facebook)
Cheetahs Gentlemen's Club San Diego/Facebook

San Diego strippers are suing the city police department after cops allegedly detained them and forced them to pose for semi-nude pictures during routine licensing inspections. The lawsuit—brought by two strip clubs and 30 of their employees—was filed Wednesday and accuses the city's vice squad of violating dancers' Fourth Amendment right to avoid unreasonable search and seizure. 

In March, about 10 officers showed up at Cheetahs Gentlemen's Club "with guns and bulletproof vests," according to the lawsuit. The clubs say officers stuck around for several hours, detaining and photographing strip club employees. "They asked us for our licenses and then took down our Social Security and had us line up in the back of the dressing rooms and take pictures," stripper Katelynn Delorie told local TV station 10News at the time. Another employee said cops asked dancers to remove articles of clothing so they could photograph all of their tattoos. 

The cops, of course, say they were just doing their jobs as prescribed. From the Los Angeles Times: 

Nude entertainment establishments require a city permit, which gives police the right to make "regular inspections" and requires employees to show their identification cards, according to police spokesman Lt. Kevin Mayer.

Taking photographs of the employees, including of distinctive tattoos, is a routine part of the inspection process, Mayer added. Inspections are meant to deter the employees from engaging in illegal acts.

"The San Diego code mandates we make these inspections," Mayer said. "This is not a criminal matter, this is a regulatory matter."

Do employees at San Diego department stores have to regularly produce ID? Do SoCal Subway cashiers get routinely photographed by cops? What makes working at a strip club such an inherently different proposition that it justifies city officials keeping an ongoing photo database of employees?

Sure, I can see why vice cops might want to regularly visit and photograph semi-nude women, just like Hawaii vice cops want sleeping with prostitutes to be part of their job. But the pretense they've cooked up to do so—strippers are just criminals waiting to happen if not closely monitored—is offensive and lame.

A 2013 "Comic Con promo," according to Cheetah's Facebook page

San Diego strippers are all required to get "entertainer's permits" (let's not even get started on that one right now) and the city apparently feels that regularly photographing entertainers—and any distinctive marks or tattoos they have—is just part of the permitting process. If so, that permitting process would seem to be pretty darn unconstitutional. Effectively, it allows cops to carry out a neverending general warrant against strippers. 

In a statement, a San Diego Police Deartment spokesperson said it "is currently conducting an internal investigation into allegations related to recent enforcement at Cheetah's Adult Nightclub" and "will not comment on this on-going internal investigation."

The clubs and women are seeking unspecified damages from the city and the police chief for "emotional distress and pain." Attorney Dan Gilleon told the Los Angeles Times that damages should be sufficient to "punish and to make an example" of the city and Police Chief Shelley Zimmerman and to deter others "from engaging in similar conduct."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Police Brutality Victim Files $10 Million Lawsuit

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Civil LibertiesStrippersFourth AmendmentSearch and SeizurePolicePolice AbuseCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (27)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Pathogen   11 years ago

    #WARONWIMINZ!!1

    1. Dweebston   11 years ago

      Nope; strippers and prostitutes don't count as wiminz in feminist parlance, and therefore paternalistically violating their economic and social liberties isn't sexist.

    2. Las Vegas Night club   11 years ago

      This is great. Good job SDPD!

  2. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

    They no longer even make any pretence of serving the public. They are above the law, and apparently the Constitution. Fucking thugs.

    Fuck you, what ya gonna do about it?

    /the brute squad

  3. The Heresiarch   11 years ago

    Ah, Cheetah's. I am familiar with the establishment. It is a true gentleman's club. You will find only the most noble landed gentry there.

    1. Episiarch   11 years ago

      If the one giving the finger with the tattoos is any indication, it's also a ripoff.

      1. The Heresiarch   11 years ago

        I'd say she's not a representative sample. Probably the best strippers in San Diego are at Cheetah's. They also regularly disregard the retarded no-touch rule that San Diego has in place. Which is probably why they were raided.

        1. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

          Bless their hearts.

      2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   11 years ago

        But you don't even know how much they're charging!

        1. Episiarch   11 years ago

          Well, I also don't care. I detest strip clubs. Especially ones populated with over-tattooed fiveheads.

          1. Sudden   11 years ago

            Ya, not a fan of women tattooing themselves. I suppose a tramp stamp or butterfly on the ankle is permissible. But these chicks that ink their body more than Al Capone's rap sheet make me wanna hurl.

            They all wanna be suicide girls, and I wish they'd go full suicide tard and simply off themselves.

            1. Carl is dead inside   11 years ago

              A little over-the-top, perhaps?

              1. Sudden   11 years ago

                I'm feeling cantankerous today

  4. Slammer   11 years ago

    Papiere und Titten, bitte.

    1. Pathogen   11 years ago

      Schnell, macht schnell! gegen die Wand, Untermenschen!

      1. Almanian!   11 years ago

        Gesundheit!

  5. Francisco d'Anconia   11 years ago

    San Diego Police Deartment spokesperson said it "is currently conducting an internal investigation into allegations related to recent enforcement at Cheetah's Adult Nightclub" and "will not comment on this on-going internal investigation."

    Quickest way for your upstanding officers in blue to avoid questions is to open an investigation about it.

    Let me guess what the result will be after the media attention dies down?

  6. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

    oink oink oink oink

    1. Scruffy Nerfherder   11 years ago

      The SDPD has a particular reputation for nastiness in general.

  7. Anonymous Coward   11 years ago

    So...the creature in the first photo...does she work for the strip club? Or the circus?

    These days, it's hard to tell. Yeah, yeah, I know, personal expression, unique and special snowflake. But the woman looks like she let a kindergarten class draw on her. And I can't fap to that.

    1. Medical Physics Guy   11 years ago

      She also looks like her face is made of molded plastic.

    2. WDATPDIM!?   11 years ago

      I can't fap to that.

      Wasn't that a Hall & Oates hit?

  8. Notorious G.K.C.   11 years ago

    "Do employees at San Diego department stores have to regularly produce ID? Do SoCal Subway cashiers get routinely photographed by cops?"

    That depends on the totality of their hotness.

  9. Trouser-Pod   11 years ago

    She looks like an evil cartoon rendering of Missy Pyle.

  10. Dread Pirate Roberts   11 years ago

    It's in the interest of public safety for SDPD to photograph strippers in various states of undress because FYTW.

  11. cavalier973   11 years ago

    That police officer in the smaller pic certainly looks like a cheerful fellow.

  12. cavalier973   11 years ago

    "I'm sorry Miss, but in order for you to be properly registered, it is necessary that I personally observe your lap-dance skills. We wouldn't want the public scammed, after all!"

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

A Car Hit and Killed Their 7-Year-Old Son. Now They're Being Charged for Letting Him Walk to the Store.

Lenore Skenazy | 6.4.2025 1:30 PM

Everything Got Worse During COVID

Christian Britschgi | 6.4.2025 1:15 PM

Mountainhead Is a Shallow Satire of Tech Billionaires

Peter Suderman | 6.4.2025 1:05 PM

New Ruling Moves Oregon Closer to Legal In-Home Psilocybin Use

Autumn Billings | 6.4.2025 11:40 AM

A First Amendment Right To Preach Orgasm?

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.4.2025 11:25 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!