Washington's Looming Pot Shortage

State-licensed pot stores are expected to start opening in Washington next month, but they won't have much pot to sell. As of Tuesday, the Washington State Liquor Control Board had issued 58 cultivation licenses; 2,585 applications from would-be growers were still pending. "There will be high demand and only a handful of people growing," says Scott O'Neil, whose store in Spokane is likely to be one of the first open for business in the state. "It's going to take at least a year to sort it out, get everybody up and running."
In addition to shortages, pot store customers will face taxes that are projected to make retail prices about 60 percent higher than they would otherwise be. Add to those factors the costs of establishing businesses that comply with state and local regulations, and the upshot, as I explain in my new Reason feature story about legalization in Washington, is that prices for legal pot will be substantially higher than current black-market prices.
How much higher? Seattle Post-Intelligencer reporter Jake Ellison, based on interviews with growers and retailers, estimates that "prices per gram will range from $15 to $25 (with some higher spikes and brief lows, possibly at $12 a gram)." Assuming a 30 percent discount for buying an entire ounce (which seems reasonable, based on prices charged by stores in Colorado), that range amounts to something like $300 to $500 per ounce. By comparison, the Price of Weed website, which collects data from cannabis buyers around the country, is currently reporting an average price of about $232 per ounce for high-quality marijuana in Washington. Looking at neighboring states, prices are a bit lower in Oregon ($209) and a bit higher in Montana and Idaho ($268 and $276, respectively). Another point of comparison: Denver dispensaries currently are charging medical customers around $10 per gram, 50 percent less than the low end of Ellison's range. Recreational customers pay more than that, but typically less than $15. Seattle dispensaries catering to patients charge $8 to $15 per gram.
In short, assuming Ellison's estimate is in the right ballpark, prices for marijuana sold by Washington's state-licensed stores could be nearly twice as high as the prices charged by dispensaries and black-market dealers. "We want to offer a wide variety of prices and quality that's affordable," one retail applicant tells Ellison. "I've had a lot of people tell me, 'We're just going to keep buying from the black market or from medical.' And that's what we don't want to see. I want to see this come out, and the retail be looked at, and [Initiative] 502 be looked at, as a good thing and a fair thing."
The LCB hopes to see state-licensed stores serving 25 percent of the market by the end of their first year (next summer, assuming licensing proceeds on schedule). Some critics (including me) see that goal as insufficiently ambitious, since supplanting the black market was one of I-502's big selling points. But given the meager initial supply and the hefty premium for legal marijuana, 25 percent may prove to be a pipe dream.
"The market, to really work and to really capture that 25 percent, will need to have consistent supply and quality supply," says Philip Dawdy of the Washington Cannabis Association, who has applied for a production license. "If you put up enough barriers for consumers, it discourages a certain percentage of them and sends them to another market. I think we're going to see that here. I think you'll see a lot of people in the beginning go to the stores just for the novelty of it. But at a certain point they're gonna say, 'Why the heck am I paying $20 a gram when Jimmy the pot dealer's gonna sell it to me for $13 a gram?' I think we're going to continue to have a black market for several years. I know pot dealers in my neighborhood in Seattle. They've all told me they're not worried a bit."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
There's no market like the black market.
I'm not buying from a store for the simple reason that there's no way in hell I'm going to give the ATF a way to try and stop me from owning/purchasing guns. As long as they're pulling that federal shit, I will buy from a dealer (and save money in the process).
I know pot dealers in my neighborhood in Seattle. They've all told me they're not worried a bit.
Yup. Not even a worry.
So here's my question Epi: Are Washington state bureaucrats fumbling legalization on purpose to give the legislature cover to reimpose prohibition, or are they really seriously this venal and incompetent?
I would guess the answer is....yes.
They are seriously this venal and incompetent. That's the State Liquor Board for you. And it may have an element of "fuck you voters" as well, since a prior referendum ended the SLB's monopoly hold on selling liquor, and they were pissed. Giving them control over weed was obviously a sop from the politicians, but we have their previous track record of horrible, low-choice state liquor stores as an example. So venal and incompetent it is.
This on steroids with a boner.
Fuck you, Washington state. Your "legalization" is turning out worse than I used to envision it, when people told me to shut up and envision the "possible".
Good night and fuck off.
What's a gram?
Goddamned Eurotrash.
It's a suffix indicating a type of message, ie telegram, candygram, potgram.
Landshark.
Mongo like candy.
"What's a gram?"
1/28th of a weight that matters.
Oh, and did I mention the Reason web-guy didn't know we were having comment-function difficulties when I contacted him last night; he's been logging hit rates and they haven't changed much.
So if you are as frustrated as I am at losing a paragraph or two and having to retype it, you might go right to the bottom of the page to locate the contacts and let him know.
You might also consider how to get Reason's attention; my 2014 donation 20 bucks smaller than it was last night for two lost comments this morning.
Emma Watson works at a pot shop?
I know, right? I figured Rupert Grint, sure, he even owns an ice cream van, but Emma?
Sounds like there isn't a looming pot shortage at all.
A looming shortage at licensed retail outlets, sure.
So once the stuff is legal to possess and smoke, lots of people will be possessing and smoking it. They just won't be purchasing it legally.
"Where'd I get it? Uh, it fell off a truck."
"Where'd I get it? You think I can remember that when stoned, Officer?"
"Tax stamp? Yeah, see, I use this case to hold my weed. I musta thrown away the bag with the tax stamp."
It's a good thing they hired legalization expert Mark Kleiman to help them set up a good efficient system. Looks like he did a marvelous job. They've approved 58 out of 2,585 cultivation licenses, 2.2%, and the tiny few with licenses are only allowed to grow tiny little plots with the largest being less than half an acre, so they're going to have to charge super high prices just to break even. Add in the taxes and you get a tiny supply of super expensive pot. Oh well, we live and learn.
The recreational prices I've seen here in Denver are between $15-20/gram. I'm curious where this mythical < $15/gram recreational pot is sold.
The selection and quality are better at retail. People will (and do here in Colorado) pay $20 a gram for high-quality, specific strains.
Look, I fought hard against the excessive taxes here, but there's no indication that they actually slowed retail sales.