Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

Relatively Small Social Networks Responsible for Large Portion of Shootings in Chicago, New York City, According to Study, Police

Ed Krayewski | 5.2.2014 1:05 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Warriors
(Warriors)
can you count?
Warriors: The Original Motion Picture Soundtrack

A pair of stories touch on similar issues of gun violence in New York City and Chicago. First, a claim from the New York Police Department (NYPD) about who is responsible for approximately 40 percent of shootings in the Big Apple, via the AP:

There are more than 300 of them in New York — violent crews of dozens of 12- to 20-year-olds with names such as Very Crispy Gangsters, True Money Gang and Cash Bama Bullies.

Police say these groups, clustered around a particular block or housing project, are responsible for about 40 percent of the city's shootings, with most of that violence stemming from the smallest of disses on the street, Facebook, Twitter or Instagram.

"It's like belonging to an evil fraternity," said Inspector Kevin Catalina, commander of the New York Police Department's gang division. "A lot of it is driven by nothing: A dispute over a girl or a wrong look or a perceived slight."

The trend of smaller, younger crews has also been seen in Chicago and Northeast cities over the last few years as police have cracked down on bigger, more traditional gangs, experts said. While the Bloods, Crips and Latin Kings still exist, operating such money-making schemes as drug dealing, their members are usually older and understand the timeworn mantra of organized crime: violence is bad for business.

For years police in New York City and other cities in the Northeast and around the country have specifically targeted organized, or "traditional," gangs like the Bloods and Crips. It shouldn't be surprising that those efforts have led to the replacement of these gangs by even more violent successors. Law enforcement also understands violence is bad for business. It's axiomatic for the drug war, where drug use is combatted, literally, by introducing violence into the otherwise non-violent acts of buying, selling, and using certain substances.

Meanwhile, a research study out of Yale University follows up on previous research about the small homicidal social networks in Chicago by extending it to non-fatal shootings. Chicago Magazine explains:

Papachristos constructs a social network—not a virtual one in the Facebook sense, but a real one of social connections between people—by looking at arrestees who have been arrested together. That turns out to be a lot of people in raw numbers, almost 170,000 people with a "co-offending tie" to one another, with an average age of 25.7 years, 78.6 percent male and 69.5 percent black. It's also a large percentage of all the individuals arrested: 40 percent of all the individuals arrested during that period.

Within the entire group, the largest component of that whole co-offender group has 107,740 people.

Within the timeframe—from 2006 to 2010—70 percent of all shootings in Chicago, or about 7,500 out of over 10,000, are contained within all the co-offending networks. And 89 percent of those shootings are within the largest component.

The study's results would suggest that assaulting the gun rights of the broader communities in Chicago, New York City, or the rest of the country is a nonsensical non-solution to gun violence. And by the NYPD's own assertions, neither is "stop and frisk" a solution. The numbers of "crews" the NYPD estimates works out to between 7,000 and 14,000 youths (depending on how many dozen are in any crew) responsible for 40 percent of shootings. It's a tiny subset not only of the total population of New York City but of any demographic group the NYPD might decide to profile.

Neither of those rights-violating approaches, anti-gun legislation or stop and frisk, make sense to curb violence, but they are easier than the kind of police work (like walking beats) or community work (like wider access to gun rights) that could actually put a damp on gun violence.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: States Americans Want to Flee Kind of Suck on Freedom and Taxes

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

PolicyCivil LibertiesCrimeSocial NetworkingCultureGun RightsChicagoNew York CityNYPDGun ControlStop and FriskPolice AbuseCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (40)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. mr simple   11 years ago

    This is obviously caused by the hippity hop music and gangster pants sagging.
    /O'Reilly

  2. The Other Kevin   11 years ago

    So people in gangs like to shoot at other people in gangs, and a few bad apples spoil the bunch. Color me shocked.

  3. Episiarch   11 years ago

    "It's like belonging to an evil fraternity,"

    Oh no not the Alpha Betas!

    1. Mint Berry Crunch   11 years ago

      Yeah, you would like that rape culture promoting movie. The panty raid scene? Lewis tricking Betty into sex? It's more misogynist than Game of Thrones!

    2. MJGreen   11 years ago

      ROBOT HOUSE!!!

  4. Lord Humungus   11 years ago

    You know who else belonged to a relatively small social network that caused a large number of shootings?

    1. DEATFBIRSECIA   11 years ago

      Lee Boyd Malvo?

    2. Sudden   11 years ago

      Daryll Gates?

    3. DEATFBIRSECIA   11 years ago

      David Fincher? Get it? Shooting? Social Network? I'm dying here! Play me out Johnnie...

    4. Ayn Random Variation   11 years ago

      Janet Reno?

    5. derpules   11 years ago

      Dick Cheney?

    6. Paul.   11 years ago

      Wyatt Earp?

    7. BuSab Agent   11 years ago

      NYPD?

  5. Suthenboy   11 years ago

    "...assaulting the gun rights of the broader communities in Chicago, New York City, or the rest of the country is a nonsensical non-solution to gun violence. "

    It was never meant to be a solution to gun violence. That is not the purpose of it.

  6. Hugh Akston   11 years ago

    I wonder what percentage of shootings the gangs that call themselves the NYPD and CPD are responsible for.

  7. Anon E. Mouse   11 years ago

    Not coincidentally, the primary offenders are young black male gang-members. If "stop and frisk" isn't the answer, perhaps using RICO statutes to prosecute gang members is.

    1. Jordan   11 years ago

      No. Stop and Frisk and RICO are both authoritarian abominations.

      1. Anon E. Mouse   11 years ago

        Not quite as abominable as not being able to walk down the street without getting shot and rolled by a hoodlum.

        1. Paul.   11 years ago

          Carry a gun.

          1. optimusratiostultum   11 years ago

            yeah then get arrested and tossed in jail with all the hoods anyway

            1. Paul.   11 years ago

              Sorry, I was speaking in generalities- like as if one was living anywhere but New York. My B.

        2. Agammamon   11 years ago

          You mean you'd prefer to get shot and rolled by the cops themselves?

  8. DEATFBIRSECIA   11 years ago

    OT, kinda proud of myself. I've been getting this pesky contribution spam from Missouri Democrats, and today I'd finally had enough. Here's what I replied:

    OK, let me see if I've got this right. You want me to support a party whose national Head, the Democratic President of the United States, freely spies on his own people without warrants, murders American citizens abroad with airborne robots without any semblance of due process, and has doubled down on the oppressive and barbaric perpetual-war tactics of his predecessor? Not to mention fighting tooth-and-nail to keep the disastrous Drug War going full steam? Oh, and has deported more people than any other President in history? Oh, and who has prosecuted more whistle-blowers for telling the truth than all other Presidents combined?

    Uh, no thanks, I'll vote Libertarian from here on out. So should you.

    And please don't send me any more of this useless team-mentality propaganda.

    Thanks But No Thanks,

    1. DEATFBIRSECIA   11 years ago

      Not that they're gonna fucking read it...

    2. Jordan   11 years ago

      You should have done this:

      Find a shoebox, or a storage bin, or any cardboard box you have laying around. Fill it up with bricks, big blocks of iron, or maybe cement. Tape the box up with everyday packaging tape. Use a junkmail's postage-paid envelope and tape it neatly to the top cover of the box. NEATLY. And mail it off. Envelope revenge!

      A few days later, your package shows up at the junk mailer's location, and they have to pay for every cent of delivery. Once the cost outweighs the benefit, they will stop sending out direct mail marketing material. And that is my goal.

      1. DEATFBIRSECIA   11 years ago

        Nice! This was electronic spam, but excellent idea for the carbon-based kind.

      2. derpules   11 years ago

        GENIUS

    3. PapayaSF   11 years ago

      One trick is to donate $1. You will be on their (and everyone's) list forever, but they'll spend much more than a dollar mailing you things.

    4. Acosmist   11 years ago

      The deportation thing is a myth.

  9. PapayaSF   11 years ago

    This sounds like another example of the Pareto principle, even though I'm not seeing an 80/20 ratio here.

  10. Tim   11 years ago

    Sounds like the science is settled. The debate is over. Gun rights Deniers must be quiet.

  11. The Late P Brooks   11 years ago

    "It's like belonging to an evil fraternity," said Inspector Kevin Catalina, commander of the New York Police Department's gang division.

    I, naturally, read this as Inspector Catalina bragging about the perks of being a cop. The biggest, baddest, most evilest fraternity gang of all.

  12. Loki   11 years ago

    For years police in New York City and other cities in the Northeast and around the country have specifically targeted organized, or "traditional," gangs like the Bloods and Crips. It shouldn't be surprising that those efforts have led to the replacement of these gangs by even more violent successors. Law enforcement also understands violence is bad for business. It's axiomatic for the drug war, where drug use is combatted, literally, by introducing violence into the otherwise non-violent acts of buying, selling, and using certain subsatnces.

    The way the above paragraph is block quoted in the original post made me think it was from the AP story. I thought maybe they had managed to write something that wasn't full derp. Got my hopes up for a second there.

  13. Brett L   11 years ago

    WAARRRIIOORS!! Come out and Playyay!

    1. Agammamon   11 years ago

      Jeezy petes man - way to quote 'Archer' wrong.

    2. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

      James Remar

  14. waffles   11 years ago

    An 18 year old kid was shot down the street from me by two kids who managed to run away. My partner remarked how the killers had to be young because no one in the game long enough to get old would be so brazen. Fucking animals.

  15. AlmightyJB   11 years ago

    "violent crews of dozens of 12- to 20-year-olds"

    Lord of the Flies. How did that happen I wonder?

  16. LarryA   11 years ago

    It's almost like... How can I put it so they'll understand...

    Ah.

    "Guns don't kill people. People kill people."

  17. Saneman   11 years ago

    These social networks do provide a platform for these infantile arguments to be played out on a larger scale. I work in an urban school district and what I see is frightening. There will be a fight, and it will be recorded, posted online, and commented on hundreds of times. The culture of fighting has been enhanced by the social networks because it increases the audience. Before social media, if there was a fight and 20 people were watching, well fine, maybe a few people heard about it, but now, upwards of 50% of the school can see it. High school kids are often facebook friends with most of the school. If there is a fight, within minutes kids are getting access to the video via friends or friends of friends. So, then someone doesn't like the comment someone made about how Joey got his ass kicked, so then that lends itself to more stupidity and more fights. I have seen kid's facebook feeds littered with fight after fight after fight. There is a "fight club" type atmosphere where these fights are recorded, scrutinized, and scrutinized again. It's like there is this constant chatter about the last fight and one that is going to happen next. Granted, I work with a group of students who are more apt to be directly involved in this atmosphere due to them being labeled with behavior problems, so I hear about it more than your average teacher.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

A Split Supreme Court Says Oklahoma Can't Have a Religious Charter School

Emma Camp | 5.23.2025 1:48 PM

Trump Declares That iPhones Should Be More Expensive

Eric Boehm | 5.23.2025 12:30 PM

Pregnant Women in Prison Aren't Getting Care, and No One Is Keeping Track

Autumn Billings | 5.23.2025 10:13 AM

RFK Jr. Plays the Hits

Liz Wolfe | 5.23.2025 9:30 AM

Farmers Need Free Markets, Not Tariffs and Welfare

Steven Greenhut | 5.23.2025 7:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!