Lawsuit Declares War on the War on Photography
Philadelphia officers defied commissioner's orders to let citizens shoot police activity.


A Temple University student and his girlfriend are filing suit in Philadelphia in response to a completely inappropriate arrest in 2012 for photographing police. Police were arresting a neighbor, and Ian Van Kuyk, a photojournalism student, went over to take pictures. Police arrested him and Meghan Feighan for obstruction of justice and disorderly conduct.
The arrest became big news because a year before, the Philadelphia police commissioner, after these tactics were exposed by the media as common behavior, put out a memo that citizens were allowed to record the police. The couple was found not guilty of all charges and is now suing for assault, battery, false arrest and imprisonment, and malicious prosecution.
The Philadelphia Inquirer notes that even though the police have gotten firm directives about the policy, there are still problems:
Mary Catherine Roper, senior staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, said some cops are not complying with the directive. The ACLU is suing the city in federal court for allegedly arresting people in retaliation for observing or photographing officers performing their duties.
In January, a police officer ordered a Daily News reporter to stop photographing an arrest outside a jewelry store at 8th and Chestnut streets. When asked for an explanation, the officer said that it was "police business" and that photos weren't allowed.
"We get those complaints," Roper said. "The department, I think, is slow to realize that just because they write something down doesn't mean all of the officers follow it."
As always, we recommend folks interested in these kinds of stories to follow the blog Photography Is Not a Crime. This month Carlos Miller has documented new incidents of police abusing citizens and journalists attempting to take pictures in Massachusetts and Baltimore. And for any newcomers who haven't yet read it, our Reason magazine feature on the War on Cameras from 2011 is available online here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Unenforced policies are not followed? I'm shocked!
Try putting this in the policy, and I'm pretty sure officers will figure it out quickly:
"The Department will not indemnify or defend an officer against damages resulting from violation of this policy."
You do and I'll murder your kids!
~Union rep.
Basically.
A few years ago I got a parking ticket from the City of Brotherly Love even though none of my vehicles had ever set tire one there. I'm told they were firing citations out into the crowd indiscriminately trying to get funds anyway they can. It seems that police department ranks right up there with Chicago, Los Angeles and New York for integrity or lack thereof. I don't think the memo sent out from the top was anything but a weak attempt at CYA.
Anyway, didn't Baltimore just lose a court case on the same subject?
Don't know about Baltimore firing out random parking tickets, but I do know Maryland threatens people with bogus "lapsed-insurance" notices in order to raise revenue.
A few years ago I got a parking ticket from the City of Brotherly Love even though none of my vehicles had ever set tire one there.
Good luck fighting that... or, I guess, I hope you had good luck fighting that.
I got a parking ticket for an address that DIDN'T EXIST in the City of Seattle, I fought and fought and fought and fought, and finally paid the ticket.
How can people have been so apathetic? Oh, wait, they weren't, as it turns out.
Kitty Genovese
Will the NYT print a retraction? It's only been 50 years.
Operation Smoke. Come on, Tennessee; seriously?
"The department, I think, is slow to realize that just because they write something down doesn't mean all of the officers follow it."
The department, I think, realized this perfectly well from the get-go.
Where I worked, every directive from HR was acknowledged by the signature of every employee. "I didn't know I couldn't do that" was not an excuse for avoiding disciplinary action. Make the cops sign directives and punish them if they "forget."
union contract precludes writing.
HTH
Aside: I am getting an ad for a cop dating site. File that one under "Things I wish I didn't know about."
Use Firefox with Adblock.
Or sign up, pretending to be a 14yo girl.
Chrome works with adblock too, and has Reasonable as well.
"We get those complaints," Roper said. "The department, I think, is slow to realize that just because they write something down doesn't mean all of the officers follow it."
Ignorance of the memo is no excuse.
That jsut makes all kinds of uber sense dude.
http://www.Anon-Works.com