British Agents Have Seen Your Penis
The latest surveillance revelation has the UK's spy agency collecting images from Yahoo web chats.


If you've used webcam chats via Yahoo, there's a chance that Great Britain's surveillance agency, Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), has collected still images of you in bulk, including images of your junk you might have flashed at some lucky person on the other end.
The latest documents leaked by Edward Snowden are about a program called Optic Nerve, which bulk-collected screenshots of Yahoo chats and stored them in databases, one image every five minutes. The images were used for experiments with automated facial recognition to try to monitor terrorism suspects. The Guardian reports:
The agency did make efforts to limit analysts' ability to see webcam images, restricting bulk searches to metadata only.
However, analysts were shown the faces of people with similar usernames to surveillance targets, potentially dragging in large numbers of innocent people. One document tells agency staff they were allowed to display "webcam images associated with similar Yahoo identifiers to your known target".
Optic Nerve was based on collecting information from GCHQ's huge network of internet cable taps, which was then processed and fed into systems provided by the NSA. Webcam information was fed into NSA's XKeyscore search tool, and NSA research was used to build the tool which identified Yahoo's webcam traffic.
One of the big problems on GCHQ's end was that the images were full of wangs and butts and boobs:
The document estimates that between 3% and 11% of the Yahoo webcam imagery harvested by GCHQ contains "undesirable nudity". Discussing efforts to make the interface "safer to use", it noted that current "naïve" pornography detectors assessed the amount of flesh in any given shot, and so attracted lots of false positives by incorrectly tagging shots of people's faces as pornography.
GCHQ did not make any specific attempts to prevent the collection or storage of explicit images, the documents suggest, but did eventually compromise by excluding images in which software had not detected any faces from search results – a bid to prevent many of the lewd shots being seen by analysts.
The system was not perfect at stopping those images reaching the eyes of GCHQ staff, though. An internal guide cautioned prospective Optic Nerve users that "there is no perfect ability to censor material which may be offensive. Users who may feel uncomfortable about such material are advised not to open them".
Yahoo condemned the program and claim they didn't know it was going on:
"We were not aware of, nor would we condone, this reported activity," said a spokeswoman. "This report, if true, represents a whole new level of violation of our users' privacy that is completely unacceptable, and we strongly call on the world's governments to reform surveillance law consistent with the principles we outlined in December.
Read the full story here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That's quaint, citizen.
This adds new meaning to "The innocent have nothing to hide."
An internal guide cautioned prospective Optic Nerve users that "there is no perfect ability to censor material which may be offensive. Users who may feel uncomfortable about such material are advised not to open them".
Oh, FFS! Fuck the users, uncomfortable or not.
To be fair, some people's faces ARE pornographic.
Bond: "Miss Anders! I didn't recognize you with your clothes on."
I only take the tape off my webcam long enough to rub my dick all over the lens.
I don't doubt it, because I have quite a few friends in eastern Europe who watch me because they like to, not because I ever have any money. The only harm I see done is I may have shattered someone's illusions at GCHQ.
Wait, Yahoo chat? Been a few years since I did anything through that outlet, but what I said still applies.
That opening says a lot about you, Scott "Loveshack" Shackford.
Here we see footage of British agents accessing Optic Nerve.
including images of your junk you might have flashed
Allegedly, teenagers do this.
That would mean the British government is trafficking child pornography.
Child porn is OK if the government does it.
Child porn is OK if the government does it.
Everything is OK if the government does it serf!
TOP MEN and all!
I want a reverse snapchat app. I want to make it impossible to scrub that image from your phone.
So does the NSA.
And they all died of envy.
incorrectly tagging shots of people's faces as pornography.
Hello, dicknose!
Is this dicknose a class mate of wood eye and cuntface?
Or are you wearing your internet mask (probably NSFW) again?
Or are you wearing your internet mask (probably NSFW) again?
So is it possible that some Brit agent stumbled upon the junk of one Anthony Weiner and gave it to his American counterparts?
I doubt it. The software filtered his name from the metadata collection.
Teh b. hussein obama c.i.a. minions engaged in a multinational conspiracy to bring down a. weiner. read all about it in our mimeographed newsletter...
If they saw Warty's penis, the death would make an epic mask of fear & loathing.
I am pretty sure gazing at even its image would turn all but those with the strongest constitution into stone.
What about a saving throw against madness?
at -5
So now my wife AND Britain know Im hung like an elevator button. Great.
"between 3% and 11% of the Yahoo webcam imagery harvested by GCHQ contains "undesirable nudity"."
Fat people
(shudder)
Ah...there's that British trait for understatement again.....
You know who else harvested undesirables..
Jim "Shanghai" Kelly?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Kelly_(crimper)
American Idol?
Buffalo Bill?
All I can think of now is the comedy value of having a dick pic come up during a facial recognition search. Get on it, Hollywood!
People don't realize that your underpants are the best spot to store your webcam when not in use. Those that do skimp on the lighting setup.
I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME
Perfect way to censor the material: don't collect it in the first place.
Is Jesse aware of this?
Looking for a connoisseur's opinion of the program?
He founded this program. He's owed royalties at this point.
This article has made my day. I hope GCHQ agents enjoyed all the taint they were seeing in 2008 before non-shitty video chat options were widely available.
Of facial recognition. I was all, yeah, I saw that one on XHAMSTER last week.
This probably is their site, the point is the Hollywood industry uses anyone to record them while asleep, responsible for the murders, rapes, beatings, division of families for profit or game, rapes of children to film. The politicians are involved and when I see them all is unreal.