Supreme Court Hears Case on Forced Unionization of Home Care Workers
Justice Scalia could end up being the swing vote
The Supreme Court appeared close Tuesday -- but maybe not close enough -- to scaling back the ability of labor unions to represent public employees.
The case before them involved just eight home-care workers in Illinois who don't want union representation, and certainly don't want to pay union dues. But it has escalated into what Justice Antonin Scalia, the potential swing vote, said could amount to "destroying the ability of the union to get money."
For decades, the law has allowed unions to collect dues from all private or public employees it is required to represent. Those who object don't have to contribute to its political or lobbying activities, but they must chip in for wage, benefit and working conditions representation.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?