Supreme Court Hears Case About Airline Lawsuit Immunity Related to Threats
Can an airline be held liable for defamation?
Supreme Court justices wrestled Monday with how much leeway to grant airlines in reporting security threats that turn out to be false.
The case involves Air Wisconsin Airlines, which argued that it deserves the same immunity from lawsuits as is granted the Transportation Security Administration.
The airline had lost a $1.4 million defamation case after reporting that a pilot, William Hoeper, was "mentally unstable" and could be armed as a passenger on a flight after he failed a simulator test.
"Those are trigger words in this context," said Kevin Russell, a lawyer representing Hoeper at the high court.
Justice Stephen Breyer provoked laughter when he said his children have been known to call him mentally unstable, but he said that doesn't resolve which complaints deserve protection from lawsuits.
Hide Comments (0)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post commentsMute this user?
Ban this user?
Un-ban this user?
Nuke this user?
Un-nuke this user?
Flag this comment?
Un-flag this comment?