On Legalizing Weed, Virginia Should Just Say Yes

Prohibition is expensive, unnecessary, and hurts people.


Last year voters in Colorado and Washington approved ballot measures legalizing recreational marijuana use. Last week Colorado approved another measure that imposes a 15 percent excise tax and a 10 percent retail tax on pot. Portland, Maine, also passed a measure legalizing weed. So did three more Michigan cities (bringing the total there to five).

Virginia should, too. Here are five reasons why.

(1) It's none of the government's business. Consider: "Marijuana prohibition is perhaps the oldest and most persistent nanny-state law we have in the U.S. We simply cannot afford a government that tries to save people from themselves. It is not the role of government to try to correct bad behavior, as long as those behaviors are not directly causing physical harm to others." Those are not the words of some San Fran hippie holdover with love beads and a Seventies-vintage VW bus. They come from former Sen. Tom Tancredo of Colorado, a Republican with a lifetime rating from the American Conservative Union of 99 percent.

Tancredo's point is one with which liberals ought to agree. Shortly before the election Tarina Keene, director of NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia, said Terry McAuliffe would owe his victory to women "who want to own their own bodies." If you agree with the concept of self-ownership, then you should agree with Milton Friedman: "I don't think the state has any more right to tell me what to put into my mouth than it has to tell me what can come out of my mouth."

(2) Pot prohibition is unnecessary. Federal law classifies marijuana as a Schedule I drug, along with heroin and LSD. According to the Justice Department, Schedule I drugs are "the most dangerous drugs of all the drug schedules," with "no currently accepted medical use" and "potentially severe psychological or physical dependence." This is absurd. True, chronic pot use is bad for you. But people chronically — and legally — use many things that are bad for you. If the harm threshold necessitating prohibition is set by laws governing tobacco and alcohol, then marijuana, which is no worse than they are, should be treated like they are. If it is not necessary to forbid something, then it is necessary not to forbid it.

(3) Prohibition costs a gawd-awful lot. America spends $3.6 billion a year enforcing its pot laws — $245 million of that here in Virginia. Arrests for possession have risen from 260,000 in 1990 to 750,000 in 2010; a whopping 10 million Americans have been arrested for possession in the past 15 years. And a fat lot of good it has done: Nearly half of U.S. adults have tried pot at least once; the National Institute on Drug Abuse says more than 17 million Americans have used it within the past month.

(4) Prohibition disproportionately hurts minorities. Whites and blacks smoke weed in roughly equal proportions, but blacks are far more likely to be arrested for possession. According to a recent piece in The Nation, police in major cities arrest blacks for marijuana possession at seven times the rate for whites. Many of those busted are young: Nationwide, 62 percent are 24 or younger.

Why the big racial disparity? Not because cops are racist. Rather, police tend to patrol high-crime areas, which mean low-income areas populated by minorities. When officers stop someone in those areas, they search for contraband — and often find pot.

They might find it in rich white neighborhoods, too, but "police officers patrolling in middle- and upper-middle-class neighborhoods typically do not search the vehicles and pockets of white people, so most well-off whites enjoy a de facto legalization of marijuana possession."

That racial disparity perpetuates others, including economic disparity. A criminal record makes getting a job harder, and spending time behind bars impedes wealth accumulation. Legalizing marijuana would change all these dynamics, starting at the source: Frequent, low-level drug busts can contribute to statistics that designate an area as "high-crime" and subject it to increased police scrutiny.

(5) The state is cutting off its own nose to spite its face. As Tancredo noted in his 2012 op/ed column in the Colorado Springs Gazette, prohibition does not stop marijuana use; it merely ensures "that all of the profits from the sale of marijuana … flow to the criminal underground." Meanwhile, taxpayers foot exorbitant enforcement bills. By contrast, estimates of the revenue from Colorado's newly approved taxes ranges from $40 million to more than $130 million a year. Those figures include only direct proceeds from excise and sales taxes. But other indirect proceeds could add up as more of the marijuana industry moves into the stream of legal commerce. Bootleggers don't pay income tax, but beer distributors do.

Virginia has a lot to gain from bringing marijuana out of the shadows, but doing so will be a long slog; at the Virginia General Assembly, even money doesn't always have the final word. Last year Del. David Englin introduced a bill merely to study the revenue potential from pot legalization. It was killed in subcommittee by anonymous vote.

This column originally appeared in the Richmond Times-Dispatch.

NEXT: Obamacare Enrollment Numbers To Be Released at 3:30pm ET

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Oh no, we're in for another huge tax increase here in MD to build a huge fence up between here and VA, you know, to protect us from the devils weed.

    1. Would't MD be more likely to legalize than VA? I know VA is slowly going TEAM BLUE, but MD has been TEAM BLUE since what, the 80's?

      1. And yes, I know TEAM BLUE loves it some Drug War at the Federal level, but they seem much more open-minded on the subject at the local/state level. (Federalism for me, but not for thee).

      2. Hah, you've never been to MD, have you? This will be the last state in the union to legalize weed. The state is completely controlled by unhinged control freak statists.

        1. I live in Towson, MD and believe me, Hyperion is totally correct, the amount of control freaks here is, well, horrifying.

          1. I'm about 5 miles or so from you bro, Mt. Washington. A prius on every block with an Obama/Biden bumper sticker.

        2. The State is completely controlled by a Democrat machine. It is pro-state largely as a side effect of its need for offices for the appointment of the Faithful.

  2. Good luck. Virginia in recent years has expanded drug prohibition (fuck you very much, Adam Ebbin).

    1. Who's Adam Ebbin?

      1. The first openly gay member of the Virginia General Assembly, Adam co-founded Virginia Partisans Gay & Lesbian Democratic Club in 1992.


        Virginia Senator Adam P. Ebbin took office in January 2012 after serving for eight years in the House of Delegates. He is the co-chair of the General Assembly's Progressive Caucus.

        Adam represents the 30th Senate District, consisting of approximately 200,000 residents who reside in portions of Arlington, Alexandria and parts of Fairfax County's Mount Vernon and Lee Magisterial Districts. The 30th district borders the Potomac River and includes Reagan National Airport, Old Town Alexandria and George Washington's Mt. Vernon Estate.

        As a leader in the General Assembly, Adam has fought to advance progressive priorities, including incentives for cleaner energy, funding for mass transit improvements, an end to discrimination in state employment, and justice for exploited workers and victims of human trafficking. He served as Chair of the Virginia Commission on the Prevention of Human Trafficking.

    2. Yes, but now that what's his face, team blue boy is in charge...

  3. Sure those are good reasons for Virginia, but what about those of us who live in one of the other 47 states?

  4. As Tancredo noted in his 2012 op/ed column in the Colorado Springs Gazette, prohibition does not stop marijuana use; it merely ensures "that all of the profits from the sale of marijuana ? flow to the criminal underground." Meanwhile, taxpayers foot exorbitant enforcement bills.

    Someone should tell Tancredo about asset forfeiture.

    Good article otherwise. But since when have Virginians responded reasonably to logical arguments regarding the moral and fiscal costs of the War on Drugs?

  5. What? Is this seriously going to be on the ballot in Virginia? Please say yes.

    1. If it is, I can't find evidence of it anywhere. Absent that, I don't see the point of this article. We already know all of the reasons why prohibition is stupid. Are we preaching to the choir here or what?

      1. It was originally published in a Richmond newspaper.

  6. According to the chart at the bottom of this fascist fuck of an article, VA is not even one of the states considering legalization.

    See chart at bottom, don't bother reading stupid reefer madness article

    KY will legalize weed before VA does. I will take up that bet with anyone.

    1. read the hit piece and the chart

  7. " It is not the role of government to try to correct bad behavior, as long as those behaviors are not directly causing physical harm to others."

    See, the problem here isn't weed. Nor is it prohibition. It's that good governance makes room for people to have a culture. While the practical aim of governance is to dictate a culture.

    The entire arbitrary discussion of 6 Kevin Bacon's of externalities are just a patina to it.

  8. 70 million in additional tax revenue for any state is a bundle. There are some in government and law enforcement who have trouble with basic math, and the results of the ballot box.

  9. True, chronic pot use is bad for you.


  10. "Prohibition disproportionately hurts minorities" - yeah, that's kinda the point. Racism had everything to do wih the inception of most anti-drug laws: Marijuana = wetbacks and niggers; opium = chinks, gooks and slopes; cocaine = spicks and dagos - at least to most of the "respectable white gentlemen" who introduced these laws.

    Plus, yes, lots of cops are racist. Perhaps not as much as in the past but it's still pretty common.

    1. LSD is the exception. It was outlawed because of hippies.

  11. Since when has a Southern state led the way in ANYTHING even remotely socially progressive? We're always the holdouts being dragged kicking and screaming into making positive change, whether it's slavery, voting rights, or integrating schools/marriage. I do applaud Arkansas for at least trying to introduce medical MJ (though the referendum was shot down, of course). I guess the best thing for a pot-loving Texan to do is move to north of Amarillo and invest in a vehicle with really good radar detectors and hiding places.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.