Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Cities Screw Residents by Squelching Uber, Lyft, and Other Ride Services

Nick Gillespie | 11.3.2013 2:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

It's a rare day when you can't read about a city in the U.S. threatening to shut down an innovative new ride-sharing service such as Uber or Lyft. Bureaucrats and elected officials usually cast their opposition in terms of public safety, but the motivation is crystal-clear. Every burg with a taxi industry also has regulations and barriers to entry that exist mostly to protect folks who are already in business. Customer satisfaction and safety has little or nothing to do with it. Indeed, the new services that take advantage of smart-phone technology are all about customer satisfaction, allowing users to post reviews online immediately. When's the last time you felt you empowered to do the same with a conventional taxi service?

On October 22, Reason TV released the video above, which details the lengths to which the Washngton, D.C. government went to kill Uber, one of the best known and most-popular new car service. The effort failed and it's well worth watching to see what it took to beat back a blatantly anti-competitive attack in the nation's capital city. Go here for more links, resources, and downloadable versions. Here's the original writeup:

The on-demand car service Uber is one of the most inventive transportation technologies of the new century. In over 20 countries - and two dozen U.S. cities - Uber uses a smartphone app to connect people who need rides with drivers of a range of vehicles from luxury towncars to regular taxis.

Like most powerful innovations, Uber disrupts the status quo by competing with established business interests. In Washington, D.C., the service was an instant hit with city residents - and almost as quickly found itself at odds with D.C.'s powerful taxi lobby and its allies on the city council. 

The result was the Uber Wars, which ended in a striking victory for the company and its customers.

Related Article: "Driving in the Future: How Regulators Try to Crush Uber, Lyft, and New Ride-Sharing Ventures." …

For more on the Capital City's taxicab cartel, watch "DC Taxi Heist." And for Reason's coverage of Uber and its regulatory run-ins, go here….

About 10 minutes.

Written and directed by Rob Montz (follow him on Twitter @robmontz) and executive produced by William Beutler at Beutler Ink (@BeutlerInk). For more information and inquiries, email TheUberWars@gmail.com

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: 2009 Nobel Peace Prize Winner Barack Obama's Ultimate #Humblebrag: He's "Really Good at Killing People."

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsUberNanny StateScience & TechnologyCivil LibertiesEconomicsPolicyTaxisRegulationTransportation Policy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (13)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Cytotoxic   12 years ago

    Calgary's evil city government is trying to squash Uber without prohibiting it, just using outrageous regulation to kill it. For example, all limo-sedan services must charge a minimum $58.74 for a trip, regardless of the trip length. Don't bother reading the justifications offered by the Taxi Tsars it will just make you want to kill.

    I think some people in Uber or Lyft are going to push the envelope with a quasi-renegade 'economic guerilla war' by offering and providing service even where prohibited. I hope so, and I think new technologies will make it more feasible.

    1. jesse.in.mb   12 years ago

      I wonder if they could do some kind of ride barter that you could buy barter points if you're short on them. Barter points could of course be cashed out if you have an excess of them.

    2. James Henry   12 years ago

      Try Uber... It's an Awesome Service!!!

      Get $10 off UBER on your next ride

      Visit
      http://www.uber.com/invite/ubernew10off

      or use PROMO CODE ubernew10off

  2. Ted S.   12 years ago

    And squelching food trucks, too.

  3. NoVAHockey   12 years ago

    I only use uber in DC. Won't hail a cab again. And clients love it. I can email a receipt so there is no question about charges.

  4. jester   12 years ago

    San Diego, many years ago, built a streetcar system that was praised and then praised some more. Curiously, it doesn't go to the airport, and mind you, San Diego's Lindbergh Field is just adjacent to downtown. Furthermore, the Coaster & Surfrider train terminal is a mere 1 mile away. Yet the much-lauded city transport doesn't connect the air pore to it.
    When I want to see my folks who live in North County of San Diego, the convenient and economical (because it is subsidized) Coaster train is an obvious choice. But I have to take a cab. Invariably, when the cabby finds out that I'm just going to the train terminal he gets pissed off and doesn't want to take me because it isn't a ride worth the queue he had to wait in.
    One of these new cabbie services wouldn't behave like that and furthermore they aren't working for one of the crony cab services that created the bullshit in the first place. I cite this story often to people who heart public (subsidized) transportation.

  5. Sevo   12 years ago

    Since Uber and several other non-taxis started operating in SF, quite a few of the cabbies have had an attitude transplant.

  6. Austrian Anarchy   12 years ago

    Has anybody checked with the Uber Left to see if they are merely upset that freedom and choice from Uber Lyft sounds so similar, yet is so opposite?

  7. JidaKida   12 years ago

    No tell me it aint so!

    http://www.PrivacyRoad.tk

  8. CE   12 years ago

    Meanwhile, the Free State Project hits the 15,000-signer milestone, 75% of the way to taking over New Hampshire:

    http://freestateproject.org/bl.....on-nh-2015

  9. James Henry   12 years ago

    Try Uber... It's an Awesome Service!!!

    Get $10 off UBER on your next ride

    Visit
    http://www.uber.com/invite/ubernew10off

    or use PROMO CODE ubernew10off

  10. Toani   12 years ago

    Hi! Please support our petition to develop a Lyft app for Windows Phones. Sign it here http://t.co/uAv6X24upn. Thanks!

  11. Claimsadjuster   11 years ago

    UberX/Lyft/Sidecar vehicles are running around with invalid insurance.

    http://blogs.kqed.org/newsfix/.....x-sidecar/

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!