Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

White House Touts "Saving Money" as a Reason to Pass Immigration Reform; Saving Money Makes an Even Better Reason to Cut Spending!

CBO estimates $1 trillion in savings over 20 years from immigration reform

Ed Krayewski | 6.20.2013 2:29 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Wikimedia
(Wikimedia)
in dc immigration reform means a bigger fence
Wikimedia

The latest missive from the White House, via the director of the domestic policy council, Cecilia Muñoz:

Hi, all!

This week, we got some big news about the immigration reform bill. It's a little wonky, but it's so great that I couldn't wait to share it with you.

The nonpartisan experts who estimate the financial impact of legislation for Congress concluded that because undocumented immigrants will start paying more in taxes for things like education and Social Security, the immigration proposal in the Senate will make the economy fairer for middle class families while cutting the U.S. deficit by almost $1,000,000,000,000 over the next two decades.

With every passing day, it's becoming clear that we can't afford not to act. Now we know exactly how much is at stake, and it's the kind of news that can help to change the policy conversation in Washington.

The e-mail continues with infographics it encourages readers to share. But what does making the process for entering and staying in the country legally have to do with the deficit?While Shikha Dalmia has explained the various economic benefits a liberal immigration policy provides and there's nothing to suggest the CBO's number is cooked, it's not the whole story. The immigration reform bill being crafted in Washington doesn't provide an amnesty or even simply liberalize immigration laws. Instead the bill is packed with new bureaucracy and spending, like billions to border security, as well as carve outs for special interests that Lindsey Graham says has them coming back for more (in a good way, he says!). A decree to be free it is not.

And if the White House was as excited about saving money as it says it is, it would've embraced the sequester as a starting point and demanded actual cuts on top of it, instead of crying doomsday over  mere reductions in spending increases.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Facebook's Instagram To Release Video Sharing Service

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

PoliticsImmigrationNanny StateEconomicsPolicyGovernment SpendingWhite HouseBordersBureaucracy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (12)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. LTC(ret) John   12 years ago

    Allow me…

    “No, fuck you, cut spending”.

    Thank you.

    1. Pro Libertate   12 years ago

      I endorse this position.

  2. gaijin   12 years ago

    It’s a little wonky…

    This has become a dog whistle to people who think they are really smart…

    1. MikeP   12 years ago

      It’s wonky to show 0’s instead of words.

      I stopped counting the 0’s when I got to 4. What’s 10 to the hrair power?

      1. gaijin   12 years ago

        What’s 10 to the hrair power?

        About a blazzillion…give or take 7

  3. Fist of Etiquette   12 years ago

    Instead the bill is packed with new bureaucracy and spending…

    No fucking shit.

  4. Sidd Finch   12 years ago

    there’s nothing to suggest the CBO’s number is cooked

    nothing?

  5. Night Elf Mohawk   12 years ago

    The nonpartisan experts who estimate the financial impact of legislation for Congress concluded that because legalized drug sellers will start paying more in taxes for things like education and Social Security…

  6. albo   12 years ago

    It’s pretty obvious that the more government gets involved in our lives, the more money we all save. I’m sure there’s a CBO report that will support that. It’s so simple. More equals savings.

    1. Gozer the Gozerian   12 years ago

      Economies of scale!

  7. playa manhattan   12 years ago

    “cutting the U.S. deficit by almost $1,000,000,000,000 over the next two decades.”
    Ummm, yeah…. If the US deficit gets cut by $1 Trillion in the next 20 years, I’ll suck her dick.

  8. Ayn Random Variation   12 years ago

    Take out “immigration” and replace with “obamacare” and the boilerplate is identical.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Police Blew Up This Innocent Woman's House and Left Her With the Bill. A Judge Says She's Owed $60,000.

Billy Binion | 6.6.2025 1:51 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!