Matt Welch Talks Rand Paul on RT and The Real News
On Monday, February 4, I appeared on The Real News with Paul Jay to talk about the foreign policy divisions within the GOP and Tea Party, and where Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) fits in with them:
Then on Wednesday, February 6, I went on RT to talk more of the same:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
that's over 22 minutes of video. Matt, you're forgetting we're all ADHD around here. Can't you just... oh look over there, something shiny...
We? Speak for yourself. Some of us are merely lazy and stupid.
Gotta love those bought and paid for politicians lol.
http://www.AnoTimes.tk
Interesting take. I do think Mr. Welch misses a significant factor muting conservatives' enthusiasm for intervention - war fatigue. It's been over eleven years since 9/11. We've pretty much been at war the entire time. We've had Afghanistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, now murmurings of Mali. In the meantime we've had a financial crisis and a major recession. When the hell is it over? Meanwhile, even the neoconservatives have to acknowledge that there's a significant chance that Iran will actually have nuclear weapons before they have a chance to intervene. At a certain point, you need a fallback position. And Paul's libertarian realism fits nicely within a long history of conservative foreign policy thought. Remember, realism (not phony pro-internationalist realism, but genuine skepticism about the ability to shape human nature), historically, defined the conservative perspective on foreign policy.
some is war fatigue and some is telling the rest of the world "this is what you asked for." Remember the global anti-war parades after going into Iraq?
A lot of folks are pro-nonintervention at this point, due in large part to the US gets blamed either way, so let's get blamed without it costing us billions of dollars.