Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Dilbert's Scott Adams: Obama's Medical Marijuana Crackdown Is a 'Firing Offense'

Matt Welch | 10.18.2012 12:16 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Scott Adams, creator of the workplace cartoon strip Dilbert, is endorsing Mitt Romney because of President Barack Obama's medical marijuana prosecutions. Excerpt from the Dilberter's blog:

[Obama] is putting an American citizen in jail for 10 years to life for operating medical marijuana dispensaries in California where it is legal under state law. And I assume the President - who has a well-documented history of extensive marijuana use in his youth - is clamping down on California dispensaries for political reasons, i.e. to get reelected. What other reason could there be?

One could argue that the President is just doing his job and enforcing existing Federal laws. That's the opposite of what he said he would do before he was elected, but lying is obviously not a firing offense for politicians.

Personally, I'd prefer death to spending the final decades of my life in prison. So while President Obama didn't technically kill a citizen, he is certainly ruining this fellow's life, and his family's lives, and the lives of countless other minor drug offenders. And he is doing it to advance his career. If that's not a firing offense, what the hell is?

Romney is likely to continue the same drug policies as the Obama administration. But he's enough of a chameleon and a pragmatist that one can't be sure. And I'm fairly certain he'd want a second term. He might find it "economical" to use federal resources in other ways than attacking California voters. And he is vocal about promoting states' rights, so he's got political cover for ignoring dispensaries in states where medical marijuana is legal.

So while I don't agree with Romney's positions on most topics, I'm endorsing him for president starting today. I think we need to set a minimum standard for presidential behavior, and jailing American citizens for political gain simply has to be a firing offense no matter how awesome you might be in other ways.

Whole thing here. Link via Walter Olson's Twitter feed.

Read former Reason editor Virginia Postrel's Q&A with Scott Adams from the February 1999 issue, plus some of our other Dilbertian content from the archives. And take time out of your busy voting (or non-voting!) schedule to re-read Jacob Sullum's classic October 2011 cover story "Bummer: Barack Obama turns out to be just another drug warrior."

Reason on the referenced Aaron Sandusky prosecution here, including this Reason.tv vid:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Sacramento May Outlaw Marijuana Gardens

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

PoliticsPolicyCivil LibertiesWar on DrugsBarack ObamaRaidElection 2012Mitt RomneyDrugsMedical Marijuana
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (169)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Paul.   13 years ago

    I'm confused... why did he endorse Romney, then? Oh, because, like the Seattle Times on Obama, he hopes Romney will do the right thing.

    1. The Derider   13 years ago

      Yeah, this makes very little sense.

      To protest Obama's mistaken stance on the drug war, I will endorse someone who is objectively worse on the drug war.

      1. R C Dean   13 years ago

        How is Romney worse on the drug war, again? What will he do that goes beyond what Obama has done?

        I mean, Obama reached out the mailed fist to jail a Canadian for advocating legalization, for chrissakes.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Emery

        1. Paul.   13 years ago

          How is Romney worse on the drug war, again?

          Romney will reach out the plated gauntlet while death metal plays in the background and he rounds up the gays to be sent to work camps!

          1. fried wylie   13 years ago

            That sounds pretty awesome.

            If anyone can revitalize America's steel industry, it's the gays.

            1. Another David   13 years ago

              The Simpsons said it, it must be true!

              1. Restoras   13 years ago

                "Hot stuff, coming through!!"

        2. The Derider   13 years ago

          Obama's against marijuana due to politics.

          Romney's against marijuana due to ideology.

          As legalization becomes more popular, Obama probably will change his policy, like on gay marriage.

          Romney won't.

          1. tarran   13 years ago

            Obama's against marijuana due to politics.

            Romney's against marijuana due to ideology.

            Romney has an ideology? I guess you are hoping we have forgotten that you work and live near Lowell.

          2. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

            MMmm...tell me more about how you care about Obama's marijuana policy.

            1. The Derider   13 years ago

              I think Obama's been really shitty on marijuana policy.

              I think most people disagree with me, though, because most people do not support legalizing weed.

          3. John Thacker   13 years ago

            No, Obama's against state medical marijuana because of ideology-- hating federalism and "states' rights."

            The George W. Bush Administration was actually fairly tolerant of state medical marijuana, mostly because of states' rights, I suspect.

            Seriously, if you look around the Internet, you actually will find committed progressives and liberals talking about how "while I want pot to be legalized, it's really important that we have these raids because we don't want to encourage states' rights."

            1. PapayaSF   13 years ago

              No shit? That's depressing.

              1. John Thacker   13 years ago

                I found it in comment threads about the Republican (sacrifical lamb) senatorial candidate favoring the pot legalization-ish initiative. They carefully explained that good liberals and progressives must oppose the initiative, since it was clearly a stalking horse for states' rights, and also must support the raids in order to support the supremacy of federal law.

          4. R C Dean   13 years ago

            As legalization becomes more popular, Obama probably will change his policy, like on gay marriage.

            Joe continues to confuse making a press release with changing policy. Obama hasn't changed any policy on gay marriage; he's issued a press release.

            Just like he issued a press release, now that I think about it, on medpot, saying the feds would adopt a hands-off approach.

            1. John Thacker   13 years ago

              In fairness, Obama himself encourages people to confuse "just words" with actual policy.

          5. John   13 years ago

            Obama's against marijuana due to politics.

            And that makes it better? Jesus Christ Joe that is stupid even for you. Given history, which is more likely to happen, a politician sell out his principles for political gain or a politician sacrifice political capital for his ideology?

            If anything being against drugs for political purposes makes it less likely Obama will change. My God you are a fucking dishonest hack.

            1. The Derider   13 years ago

              Mitt Romney's religion views marijuana consumption as a moral sin.

              You think he's going to change his "I will fight against legalization" policy any time soon?

          6. mad libertarian guy   13 years ago

            Obama's against marijuana due to politics.

            Romney's against marijuana due to ideology.

            Which makes Obama's position objectively worse. Nothing says hope and change like throwing hundreds of thousands of people in jail per annum so he can get political support. He's literally trading the lives of other people so he can continue in office.

            1. The Derider   13 years ago

              I'm pretty sure Obama breaking his promise not to fuck with dispensaries hasn't resulted in hundreds of thousands of arrests.

          7. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   13 years ago

            Obama's against marijuana due to politics.

            Romney's against marijuana due to ideology.

            When you're on Jeopardy, the answer to every question in the "Famous Titles" category is not "Dolly Parton".

        3. Geoff Nathan   13 years ago

          He'll do the same thing to the 'adult entertainment' industry as well. So 1+1 is greater than 1+0. That's why Romney is worse.

          1. R C Dean   13 years ago

            Remind me again which President brought a high-profile criminal case against an outre porn producer?

            1. fried wylie   13 years ago

              Obama inherited that prosecution from BOOOOOOSH!!111oneoneone

              1. dbobway   13 years ago

                That is complete Bullshit! Look it up.

                Obama got your vote saying he would leave medical pot to the states to regulate. He LIED!

                Both parties want control of us. The Democrats want way more than the other guys!

        4. Stormy Dragon   13 years ago

          "I would not legalize marijuana for medicinal purposes, and the reasons are straightforward: As I talk to people in my state and at the federal government level about marijuana and its role in society, they are convinced that the entry way into a drug culture for our young people is marijuana. Marijuana is the starter drug....The idea of medical marijuana is designed to get marijuana out in the public marketplace and ultimately lead to the legalization of marijuana overall. And in my view, that's the wrong way to go. I know that other people have differing views. If you'd like to get someone who is in favor of marijuana, I know there are some on the Democratic side of the aisle who will be happy to get in your campaign. But I'm opposed to it, and if you elect me president, you're not going to see legalized marijuana. I'm going to fight it tooth and nail." -- Mitt Romney

          1. Drax the Destroyer   13 years ago

            What. A. Fucking. Pasty. White. Pussy. Sack. Of. Rusty. Tools.

          2. The Derider   13 years ago

            Ding Ding Ding

      2. John Thacker   13 years ago

        Can you at least admit that George W. Bush was objectively better on the drug war, at least with medical pot?

        Not that I'm voting for Romney; I just think you have a really difficult time arguing that he's worse.

        1. The Derider   13 years ago

          George W Bush was objectively better on medical marijuana, although that may have more to do with incompetence than anything.

          I don't think GWB is objectively better on the drug war, overall.

          1. John Thacker   13 years ago

            Objectively better on medical pot, not objectively different on any other aspect of the drug war == objectively better on the drug war, overall, in my book. YMMV.

            I will grant that Obama has nicer sounding press releases, even if they are full of lies.

      3. dbobway   13 years ago

        Check this out

        Under Clinton, the drug war was ramped up as well. Why is Obama doing this? The only reason a person would say one thing and do another can only mean he is hiding a selfish intent.

        Most people like Romney don't like pot because, they are told it's not good for you. He doesn't even drink soda, it's not Mormon. We can only hope that states rights and peoples freedoms are more important to Romney than Obama's lust for power. We now know the latter to be true, we don't know about Romney.
        I'm taking my chances on a maybe over a sure thing!

        1. John   13 years ago

          The drug war massively benefits cops and cop unions and social workers who do drug rehab. Given that those are two huge Dem constituencies whose livelihoods depend on the drug war, anyone who thinks the Democratic Party is ever going to end the drug war is Joe from Lowell level delusional.

          1. Zeb   13 years ago

            Yep. Here in NH over the past several years, several decriminalization and medical MJ laws have been passed by the republican controlled legislature and vetoed by the Democratic governor. TO be fair, they do tend to get a bit more support from democrats than republicans in the legislature, but it is certainly hard to make the case that the demos are any better overall.

            1. John   13 years ago

              Why would the SEIU or social workers ever support legalization?

              1. Restoras   13 years ago

                Dey tuuke our JERBS!

    2. CampingInYourPark   13 years ago

      Think his point was, even if he doesn't do "the right thing" he's might not lie in your face about it.

      1. Paul.   13 years ago

        Perhaps a candidate who does the right thing is in order?

        Nah, too far.

        1. CampingInYourPark   13 years ago

          I think Romney's position is that he's against legalization but that it's a state issue. Whether he practices what he says is debatable, but if that is the position he practices IMO it's better than what the DOJ is doing.

          1. Fatty Bolger   13 years ago

            We know that's Ryan's position. Romney really hasn't said. I'm sure this is not a topic he really wants to talk about, so I wouldn't expect any more details before the election.

            1. BarryD   13 years ago

              I don't suspect that Romney really gives a shit.

              Chamber-of-commerce Republicans neither favor the repeal of drug laws, nor are they gung-ho about spending money enforcing them, typically. So Romney is not alone, either.

            2. Stormy Dragon   13 years ago

              Romney has said. He thinks Obama is being too weak on Marijuana and he wants to turn it up to 11:

              http://reason.com/blog/2012/09.....-legalizat

              Which is pretty the Romney campaign in a nut shell. He correctly points out how terrible Obama is, but then vows things will be even worse when he's in charage.

              1. CampingInYourPark   13 years ago

                "He correctly points out how terrible Obama is, but then vows things will be even worse"

                When a Romney administration starts prosecuting Mormon missionaries for trespassing you can call him "worse"

              2. Fatty Bolger   13 years ago

                He said he'll fight legalization. He did not say how he would deal with states who have legalized medical marijuana.

          2. Stormy Dragon   13 years ago

            http://reason.com/blog/2012/09.....-legalizat

            1. CampingInYourPark   13 years ago

              Yeah, that video from 2007 Sullum said was a "couple of months" old.

              "But just when you thought Romney was completely clueless on this, watch the end of the interview (at about 4:50) and you'll see him saying marijuana is a state issue that's irrelevant to his presidential campaign."

              http://stopthedrugwar.org/spea.....ments_medi

    3. fried wylie   13 years ago

      He's just stuck in the 2-party system.

      The "best" way to get obama fired is to elect The Other Guy. Will it alter any outcomes for our nation over the next guy's term? Nah. But IT DOES get obama fired.

      Admit it, things still aren't fucked up enough for a 3rd party candidate to do anything but steal votes from the main 2. So, in 2016, I expect Adams to be cheering for the next Other Guy to get romney fired for ruining peoples lives to advance his political career.

      1. Paul.   13 years ago

        So Adams will endorse Biden... interesting.

        1. fried wylie   13 years ago

          We live in interesting, tragicomedic times.

          1. Drax the Destroyer   13 years ago

            Is it possible to feel Schadenfreude when you are inside the crumbling, once gilded, walls of Camelot?

      2. BarryD   13 years ago

        "He's just stuck in the 2-party system."

        We all are.

        Whether or not we admit that, only says something about us and the depth of our denial.

        1. Randian   13 years ago

          Really? That's funny...my ballot has more than two parties on it. Must be a misprint.

          1. BarryD   13 years ago

            The fact that I sometimes piss in my yard does not make the sewer system go away.

            The two-party system is the same.

            1. Drax the Destroyer   13 years ago

              So the two-party system is essentially a river of shit, best kept underground and ignored every second of the day lest one wants to contemplate the stench of millions of tons of feces?

              1. BarryD   13 years ago

                Yes.

                But it does exist, and it flows downhill.

      3. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   13 years ago

        Admit it, things still aren't fucked up enough for a 3rd party candidate to do anything but steal votes from the main 2.

        I'll admit no such thing. Neither of those assholes were ever in consideration for my vote.

    4. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

      Oh, because, like the Seattle Times on Obama, he hopes Romney will do the right thing.

      Yet another example of that Rorshach Test to which I was referring, John.

    5. db   13 years ago

      It's like giving out a major world on the expectation of greatness. When has that ever happened before?

    6. Zeb   13 years ago

      Sounds like the endorsement is mostly anti-Obama and not particularly pro-Romney. He probably gets mroe press this way than if he just said "don't vote for Obama" or endorsed Johnson or the Green party.

    7. shamalam   13 years ago

      His point is simple. If a politician goes beyond the pale, fire him.

      1. BarryD   13 years ago

        Racist!

        1. shamalam   13 years ago

          +1.

          "pale..." So many words, all of them racist if you think about it long enough.

    8. Zach Weissmueller   13 years ago

      Sandusky opened his dispensary in 2009 under the assumption that Obama would stick to his campaign promise not to prosecute those operating within CA state law, a promise which was later reaffirmed by Eric Holder. Now, he's sitting in prison.

      I can see Adams' logic.

  2. NoVAHockey   13 years ago

    "Obama didn't technically kill a citizen"

    well, technically, he has.

    1. Voros McCracken   13 years ago

      A couple, one of whom was 16.

      1. BarryD   13 years ago

        He just got in the way of a missile headed for another American citizen, didn't he?

    2. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

      He should read "didn't technically kill this citizen" or "didn't technically kill a citizen in this case".

    3. R C Dean   13 years ago

      I recall the gushing encomiums from late summer for Obama, the Scourge of the Middle East, poring over the kill list and personally authorizing every strike.

      So, yeah, according to his own flacks, he did personally order the killing of American citizens.

      1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

        Cue Candy Crowley...

        1. BarryD   13 years ago

          Ewww!

  3. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

    When are we going to have the Reason writers list of who they are voting for? Or is that an after the election moment?

    Personally, I'm stuck in a bind. GJ isn't on the ballot, so that will mean a write-in. Or should I vote for Romney just to stick it to Obama? MI may be a surprise pickup, though highly doubtful.

    1. steve walsh   13 years ago

      Don't waste your time voting, your vote doesn't matter.

      1. Drax the Destroyer   13 years ago

        Think I've finally conceded to this reality, Walshy. Not sure if that means part of me has died inside or if part of me is now alive again. Meh. Fuck it.

        1. steve walsh   13 years ago

          Sorry, but sometimes the truth hurts.

    2. Matt Welch   13 years ago

      Very soon! I'm voting for Gary Johnson here in New York, FWIW.

      1. Lord Humungus   13 years ago

        thanks, Matt!

      2. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

        Nice. Out of all the Reason bloggers, you are definitely in my top 20, Matt.

        1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

          WG, you're definitely in my top 1000 commenters.

          1. generic Brand   13 years ago

            Where do the anonbots fall in that list of top 1000?

            1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

              882-971

              1. fried wylie   13 years ago

                The reserved address range for anonbots.

      3. taxmaiden   13 years ago

        Thank you, Matt! It's too bad Mr. Adams couldn't have endorsed Gary. He's the perfect candidate for this issue and, well, all the issues.

      4. Restoras   13 years ago

        Me too, Matt.

      5. shamalam   13 years ago

        Excellent choice! Me too.

    3. Paul.   13 years ago

      Can you not write Gay Jay in?

      1. Stormy Dragon   13 years ago

        In some states, you have to be an "official write in candidate" or they don't count the write-in votes for you.

        1. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   13 years ago

          Is that anything like a verbally committed walk-on?

  4. fried wylie   13 years ago

    he is certainly ruining this fellow's life, and his family's lives, and the lives of countless other minor drug offenders. And he is doing it to advance his career.

    Eggs, Obamlettes. Fuck You, That's Why.

    Also, Fried Chicken.

    1. Gojira   13 years ago

      Also, Fried Chicken.

      You remain my favorite commenter, fried wylie.

      1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

        Hey!

        1. Gojira   13 years ago

          Oh please GM, you're like 5th on the list, behind fried wylie, Epi, Epi's amazing lips, and NutraSweet's pancreas (which posts as "Warty").

          1. fried wylie   13 years ago

            Do Epi and his lips have diabetes? Would make an odd coincidence that all your favs are insulin addicts.

          2. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

            Whew! For a minute there I thought you were damning me with faint praise...wait, WHAT?

          3. LTC(ret) John   13 years ago

            "NutraSweet's pancreas (which posts as "Warty")."

            Well, that would explain some things.

  5. Aresen   13 years ago

    If you endorse Romney because you don't like Obama's medical marijuana policy, isn't that like endorsing the Ancien R?gime because you don't the the Comit? de salut public?

    1. Eduard van Haalen   13 years ago

      To be literal, the Comite de Salut Public locked up/killed more people without fair trials than the kings did.

    2. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   13 years ago

      Dennis Miller, is that you?

  6. steve walsh   13 years ago

    Makes no sense, for sure, but I suspect Adams is thinking what Obama has done is worse than what Romney has yet to do.

    1. robc   13 years ago

      He is saying being a liar makes Obama worse.

      1. Robert   13 years ago

        And that being unreliable and a waffler makes Romney better. And he's right about that.

  7. DK   13 years ago

    no matter how awesome you might be in other ways.

    Now I see why he's a cartoonist - that's some funny shit right there.

    1. Fatty Bolger   13 years ago

      Yeah. I was thinking, in what other ways is Obama awesome?

      So many to choose from! I mean there is...

      Well he... um...

      What about that time he... uh... huh.

      1. rac3rx   13 years ago

        He's a really awesome reader.

        1. fried wylie   13 years ago

          and he's so well spoken.

          1. Zeb   13 years ago

            And bathes regularly.

            1. BarryD   13 years ago

              One assumes.

            2. Restoras   13 years ago

              His golf shoes always seem nice and clean. Mark of a gentleman.

      2. Drax the Destroyer   13 years ago

        He's black so that means we're all cool now.

  8. Delroy   13 years ago

    Which Dilbert character do you think is most likely a libertarian? My first reaction is to say Alice, which is odd since she's a female - NTTAWWT.

    1. fried wylie   13 years ago

      I'd say it's that fearful intern, Akosh or something?

      1. Delroy   13 years ago

        Asok - brilliant, but naive.

    2. C. Anacreon   13 years ago

      Dogbert

      1. Groovus Maximus   13 years ago

        Win.

      2. Delroy   13 years ago

        I almost said Dogbert. I love his portrayal of the outside consultant and how idiots at the company would accept his "wisdom" unquestioningly. I worked for a major consulting company at one time and saw some similarities.

      3. fried wylie   13 years ago

        I disagree, Dogbert seems like more of a cronyist.

    3. R C Dean   13 years ago

      Wally. No character has greater disdain for authority.

      Catbert is a total Randian, though.

      1. Delroy   13 years ago

        Catbert is in HR. Are there really any libertarians in HR?

        1. SugarFree   13 years ago

          I thought that looking at humans as resources is what the leftists hate about us the most.

          "Work?!? Like thinking people should have a job?" [faints dead away]

    4. kinnath   13 years ago

      I used to put WWWD (what would wally do) on my white board at work.

    5. sarcasmic   13 years ago

      Wally.

      http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2012-06-15

      1. Delroy   13 years ago

        I forgot about that one. Excellent!

        1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

          It's taped to the wall of my cube.

          1. Brett L   13 years ago

            You're really sticking it to management!

            1. db   13 years ago

              Many managers could be replaced with walls.

              1. fried wylie   13 years ago

                save the construction costs, just replace the managers with nothing.

      2. John   13 years ago

        I pretty much model my professional life after Wally.

        1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

          I'm not surprised.

          1. John   13 years ago

            It has worked pretty well. If you work in a bureaucracy, you are either Wally or the pointed haired boss. I will take Wally thank you.

      3. Raston Bot   13 years ago

        patent trolls:

        http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2012-06-30/

  9. BoscoH   13 years ago

    One summer day, back in 1992, I was working as a consultant at Pacific Bell in San Ramon -- a cushy opportunity that my Dad found for me (and for which I did a bang-up job). He and I used to make the 3 mile commute together each day. Walking through the parking lot, I saw a silver 280Z with the license plate "DOGBERT". Pointed it out to my Dad, and he said there was this crazy cartoonist a couple sections over who's strip runs in some local papers. Met him. Nicest guy in the world. I think he knew at the time that he was going to blow up big, and soon.

    1. Delroy   13 years ago

      Huh, I started working for a consulting firm in 1992. Anyone remember KPMG?

  10. Killazontherun   13 years ago

    Hey, maybe you guys at Reason can get Scott Chapman on the phone with Adams to persuae the cartoonist to change his mind. After all, compared to what Biden wanted, Obama has demonstrated a soft, reasonable hand on the enforcement of drug laws.

    1. Killazontherun   13 years ago

      Steve Chapman, Scott Adams. Whatevs.

    2. John   13 years ago

      He only hit us in the face with his fist. He wanted to use brass knuckles.

  11. Longtorso   13 years ago

    I think the idea is firing any elected official who does what Obama did regardless of whether the replacement will do the same, in the hopes that consistently doing so will change what future replacement officials do. I'm not optimistic, but that's the logic.

    1. John Thacker   13 years ago

      Yes. It's the same logic that had a lot of libertarians (in the broader sense) voting against McCain because of what George W. Bush did.

      It is sad that this year the two major party candidates are significantly worse on trade, immigration, and farm subsidies than either GWB or McCain.

      1. Killazontherun   13 years ago

        There was an excellent reason to not vote for John McCain under any circumstances. He is the biggest back stabber in the Republican party since Teddy Roosevelt.

        1. Robert   13 years ago

          I know. And yet I voted for him because I don't want to encourage the Libertarian Party.

        2. John Thacker   13 years ago

          Is "biggest back stabber" the same thing as being willing to go against the party hierarchy?

          I don't think that's necessarily a good or bad thing, by itself. It depends on the issue.

      2. JW   13 years ago

        Is it OK to have voted against McCain because McCain sucks?

        1. John Thacker   13 years ago

          Well, sure. Though I think that for all his incredibly annoying self-righteousness, he was better than any of the two major party candidates going back to 2000.

      3. darius404   13 years ago

        I find it amusing that the same people who decry this logic when it came to McCain vs. Obama now use it when it comes to Obama vs. Romney.

      4. PapayaSF   13 years ago

        I don't think it's the same thing. Neither McCain nor Obama were incumbents.

        1. John Thacker   13 years ago

          Sure, but I'm pretty certain that GWB hangover affected McCain's vote totals.

          Plenty of people around here (both Reason contributors and commenters) explicitly said that the Republican Party needed to be punished for GWB in order to force it to reform.

  12. death panelist   13 years ago

    I checked out the comments on Adams's post to see if there was any GJ love to be found (not much - bad sign if he can't connect on THIS issue...)...

    Meanwhile, sorted through astounding amount of nonsense like this...

    Scott Adams has hit rock bottom. He's been utterly corrupted by his wealth and has become simultaneously a pimp and a prostitute for the Romney campaign.

    He not only links President Obama, without a shred of jusitification, to this only recently publicized court case. He accuses the President of being directly, personally, and exclusively responsible for convicting and sentencing someone to ten years in jail. In reality, the President is busy with his campaign and probably doesn't even know about this case, let alone has been a participant in it.

    We are truly and spectacularly fucked...

    1. Auric Demonocles   13 years ago

      In reality, the President is busy with his campaign

      That sounds like another firing offense.

      1. Drax the Destroyer   13 years ago

        If this half-assed, half-asleep campaign performance constitutes "busy," well... no wonder everything he's touched has gotten shittier and shittier.

        1. PapayaSF   13 years ago

          It was a fully-assed, fully-awake strategy born of blinkered arrogance.

    2. Robert   13 years ago

      Maybe he'll pardon him after the election.

    3. Delroy   13 years ago

      This is what Adams replied to one of the comments recommending he vote for Gary Johnson:

      "It's only half as effective to take a vote away from the incumbent and flush it down the toilet with a Libertarian candidate versus taking one vote from the incumbent and adding one vote to the only person who might beat him. -- Scott"

      Yeah, like it's in any way effective to vote for Romney in California. And I thought Adams was an intelligent guy.

      1. John   13 years ago

        National vote totals matter to some degree. The lower percentage of votes the loser gets, the more the election is looked upon and remembered as a rejection of the loser.

        1. death panelist   13 years ago

          National vote totals matter to some degree.

          Which, if your main issue is medical/legalizing marijuana, is all the more reason to "waste" your vote on the Libertarian candidate, since even though he "can't win," every vote he gets can be interpreted as an "anti-prohibition" vote since neither the Dem or Rep advocate that position.

      2. JW   13 years ago

        "Don't blame me, I voted for the Turd Sandwich!"

        I could appreciate it if Adams said he was holding his nose and voting tactically, but outright endorsing Romniac under some delusion that he will do something that he never said that he would do, is fucking idiotic.

        Sounds like an Obama 2008 voter.

  13. Enough About Palin   13 years ago

    A Hiram man was shot in his home Wednesday afternoon by agents from a multi-agency drug task force executing a narcotics search warrant.
    The 60-year-old suspect was discovered "with some sort of weapon in his hand," according to a spokesman with the Paulding County Sheriff's Office, after agents had forced their way into his home in the 3800 block of Nebo Road.
    Spokesman Ashley Henson said the suspect was airlifted to a Atlanta-area hospital in critical condition. Family members told Channel 2 Action News that the man, whom they identified as Danny Hammett, had died.
    Hammett's son told Channel 2 that his father was unarmed.
    "They killed him. They killed an innocent man and that's all there is to say to it," Clyde Hammett said.
    "They say he was armed. They can search all they want, there's no guns in that house," Hammett said.

    http://www.ajc.com/news/news/c.....ing/nSf83/

    1. SugarFree   13 years ago

      They can search all they want, there's no guns in that house

      I'm sure there is by now.

      1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

        They don't need to find a gun. All that is necessary is the officer feared for his safety. Can't let them second guess themselves wondering if the thing in the guy's hand is a gun or a remote control. Officer safety is paramount. He feared for his safety and opened fire. It's the perp's fault for having a remote control in his hand when the cops busted down his door. He should have known better. Case closed.

        1. NeonCat   13 years ago

          Hey! It wasn't a remote! It was pepper spray! Why, any of those cops could have been subjected to several minutes of physical pain! As it is they have to deal with the trauma of killing a man while on paid administrative leave!

          1. Restoras   13 years ago

            Pepper spray, pepper mill, salt shaker - why, if properly used, anyone of those things could incapacitate an Agent of The State!

            Prediction: Nothing Else Will Happen. (NEWH from now on)

        2. LTC(ret) John   13 years ago

          "Furtive movement"

          "Suspicous object"

          Officers all went home after procedures were followed and lethal force was applied.

      2. Whiterun Guard   13 years ago

        Any relation to Kirk you think?

        1. fried wylie   13 years ago

          Are you saying the "weapon" might have been one of those pointy-ass guitars?

    2. R C Dean   13 years ago

      The 60-year-old suspect was discovered "with some sort of weapon in his hand,"

      A steak knife, perhaps?

      1. sarcasmic   13 years ago

        Maybe he's hung like Dennis Rodman and they walked in on him pleasuring himself.

        1. Ayn Random Variation   13 years ago

          damn you beat me to it.

      2. Restoras   13 years ago

        At his age, more likely a spork.

    3. Ayn Random Variation   13 years ago

      Poor guy was jerking off when they busted in.

  14. brec   13 years ago

    The boilerplate at the top of the linked blog entry:

    This blog is written for a rational audience that likes to have fun wrestling with unique or controversial points of view. It is written in a style that can easily be confused as advocacy or opinion...

    So Adams is not really endorsing Romney; it's all a big joke.

    1. thom   13 years ago

      He's been doing that ever since he offended a bunch of women's groups a few years ago.

  15. jdgalt   13 years ago

    You should at least mention that Adams' blog and everything on it is a joke, and well labeled as such.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The App Store Freedom Act Compromises User Privacy To Punish Big Tech

Jack Nicastro | 5.8.2025 4:57 PM

Is Shiloh Hendrix Really the End of Cancel Culture?

Robby Soave | 5.8.2025 4:10 PM

Good Riddance to Ed Martin, Trump's Failed Pick for U.S. Attorney for D.C.

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.8.2025 3:55 PM

Trump's Tariffs Are Already Raising Car Prices and Hurting Automakers

Joe Lancaster | 5.8.2025 2:35 PM

Trump's Antitrust Enforcer Says 'Big Is Bad'

Jack Nicastro | 5.8.2025 2:19 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!