Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

Joe Biden: The Smirk Store Called; They're Running Out of Smirks.

Nick Gillespie | 10.11.2012 11:07 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Like this picture at Facebook.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reason Live Tweets the 2012 Vice Presidential Debate. Now!

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsElection 2012WorldNanny StateWar on DrugsScience & TechnologyCultureCivil LibertiesEconomicsPolicyJoe BidenPaul Ryan
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (124)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. sticks   13 years ago

    Make it stop make it stop

    1. Corning   13 years ago

      In all the years and of all the gifs...

      Reason chooses this one to break their no animated gif taboo.

      1. Ted S.   13 years ago

        I'm glad I visit with only cached images set to load.

        Is it only a couple of frames, or is it one of those memory-hogging gifs as a substitute for video?

        1. Atanarjuat   13 years ago

          It's only two frames, but his facial skin seems as loose and stretchy as my freshly shorn nutsack.

      2. Cavpitalist   13 years ago

        LSUFreek, it isn't.

  2. MJGreen   13 years ago

    Well I slept with his wife!

    1. Sudden   13 years ago

      The dead one?

      1. MJGreen   13 years ago

        That is the implication, yes.

        And I do feel crappy for doing it.

        1. Sudden   13 years ago

          Don't.

          This debate made the living envy the dead.

          We even envy the dead with your dick in 'em. That shows you how bad this was.

  3. Tulpa Doom   13 years ago

    This is why we're not allowed to post images on H+R.

  4. Longtorso   13 years ago

    Thanks for the nightmare fuel, Reason.

  5. Hugh Akston   13 years ago

    Of course they're running out. Bain Capital acquired the smirk factory in 1998 and fired all the workers before selling the assets to Chinese interests.

    1. Randian   13 years ago

      A woman DIED due to a critical lack of smirks, Hugh. You glibertarians are all the same.

      1. LTC(ret) John   13 years ago

        OK, that one was #WINNING!

  6. T o n y   13 years ago

    The straw store called. They're running out of Republican grasping.

    1. Beefkins   13 years ago

      Gee guys, Tony's right! Instead of focusing on Slow Joe's weird facial tics, we should be focusing on the more important things. Like the fact that he lied about voting against the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Or the fact that he's geographically retarded with regards to Libya and Syria.

      1. T o n y   13 years ago

        One ambiguous the other not an error, just fumbled in delivery. Ryan lied all night. It's not his fault, it's what his party does, because "we want to take your social security money and give it to billionaires and defense contractors" doesn't sell so well.

        1. PapayaSF   13 years ago

          Biden pretty brazenly lied about not forcing Catholic organizations to provide birth control, etc. Then why are they suing?

          1. Sudden   13 years ago

            One thing that bothered my about that exchange and bothers me about the abortion issue in general:

            "I personally subscribe to the Catholic belief in life at conception, but I'm not willing to tell anyone else how to live their life."

            I can respect the idea of being pro-choice because you believe it is just a ball of cells. But the second you say you believe it is life, but that some people should be allowed to end that life, then you're essentially giving allowances for taking innocent life and thereby robbing the most essential of all civil rights, the right to not have your life taken by another without your consent. I know this "my personal belief is x but my policy belief is y" is the go to line for all pro-choice candidates, but it is fundamentally either a) illogical or b) sociopathic.

            1. T o n y   13 years ago

              He failed to make a strong pro-choice argument and fell back on religion, yeah. You're right.

              1. Sudden   13 years ago

                Regardless of the pro-choice or pro-life position. My whole thesis is that at whatever point you believe something is human life, that becomes worthy of legal protection.

                The whole "i believe x, but I'll allow y" has emerged as some sort of nuanced middle ground that allows people to skirt the issue and not grapple with the fundamental morality. The sad fact is that at whatever point something becomes human life, it merits legal recognition and protection. Be a man and say "Its just a ball of cells until x trimester/months/birth". The alternative is tacit support for murder so as to not inconvenience the murderer.

                1. T o n y   13 years ago

                  I agree. The moral premise that a ball of cells is a full person is extremely socially problematic.

                  1. Sudden   13 years ago

                    Your attempts at coming across as clever simply come across as pathetic and try hard.

                    1. PapayaSF   13 years ago

                      Sudden, I understand your point, and it's a good one. It is odd that it only seems to be an acceptable position when it comes to being pro-choice on abortion. I don't think it would cut it to say: "I don't believe in racial discrimination/child labor/beating my wife, but I won't impose my beliefs on others."

            2. Bill Dalasio   13 years ago

              Well, I think you can make the case that it is life but doesn't rise to the level of human life, per se. We show progressively more concern for what we regard as higher order forms of life. We condemn Michael Vick for participating in dog fighting, but hire people to kill mice.

              1. R C Dean   13 years ago

                I suspect that equating fetuses with vermin is not going to convince many pro-lifers to change their tune.

          2. T o n y   13 years ago

            Can't remember what he said. Churches and other entities that serve or employ majority Catholics are exempt. Other Catholic-affiliated orgs have to facilitate the same rights to women as every other org, and I don't see why religion should trump a reasonable social accommodation. Nor will I defer to the Catholic Church's credibility on social consciousness.

            1. Calidissident   13 years ago

              I honestly can't comprehend how something like an employment contract should be required to include giving one party a "right" to have their birth control paid for.

              1. PapayaSF   13 years ago

                ^This.

              2. T o n y   13 years ago

                Well, I can comprehend a world in which birth control is not easily accessible, and it's one full of unwanted screaming brats ruining my lunch.

                1. Calidissident   13 years ago

                  Not being paid for by other people = not easily accessible? WTF? And if that's your definition, isn't that world anywhere on Earth at any time in history? If so, you think free birth control is just gonna magically change that?

                2. VG Zaytsev   13 years ago

                  Well, I can comprehend a world in which birth control is not easily accessible

                  Which world is that Tony?

                  It's certainly not modern America, where ten bucks will buy you a months' worth of birth control pills or a a bottle of 50 condoms.

                3. The Craig   13 years ago

                  "Well, I can comprehend a world in which birth control is not easily accessible, and it's one full of unwanted screaming brats ruining my lunch."

                  Tony sees no difference between shooting a kid in the head and not offering them free abortions to themselves.

            2. PapayaSF   13 years ago

              But Tony will defer to Joe Biden's credibility on social consciousness.

            3. AuH2O   13 years ago

              Yep, Tony, you're really doing the Catholic Church a favor, what with letting them run all those cheap hospitals and generous charities.

              Can I say how pissed off I will be when your fellow travelers start bitching about the Catholic Church closing its hospitals rather than violate their beliefs? How angry it will make me when people call the Catholic Church mean and evil for doing so?

              1. LTC(ret) John   13 years ago

                Like their adoption services in IL - oh well, I am sure the hard working government employees will make up for it!

            4. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   13 years ago

              Free stuff is not a right.

              1. Mr. Soul   13 years ago

                ...because I have a right to not provide it.

        2. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

          The straw store called and said your man is so large they can no longer meet your demand.

          1. T o n y   13 years ago

            your man is so large

            I get that a lot.

            1. Francisco d Anconia   13 years ago

              Uhummm.

            2. AuH2O   13 years ago

              Just be careful there, buddy. Some nasty things can happen to your anus if you fella is a bit too large there.

              Use lube, kegels, etc.

            3. AuH2O   13 years ago

              Also, Tony, I hope your young fella has the goddamn courtesy to give you a reach around.

              1. T o n y   13 years ago

                My fella? Reacharound? Are you 80?

        3. Calidissident   13 years ago

          It's funny how Tony thinks Republicans are a bunch of serial liars, and then actually think they're serious whenever they say things about cutting spending and limiting government. The Republicans are never gonna do shit about Social Security, least of all Romney and Ryan

          1. Cytotoxic   13 years ago

            QFT

          2. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

            Never is a long time.

            1. R C Dean   13 years ago

              The Entitlement State will get reformed, and there's a nonzero chance it will be Republicans that do it, simply because they may be the ones sitting in the big chair when we hit the fiscal wall.

              There's the same nonzero chance that Dems will reform the Entitlement State.

              The critical variable here isn't party, because our ruling class, regardless of party, won't touch the Entitlement State in any meaningful way if they can possibly avoid it. The critical variable is timing: when the music stops, whoever is in charge will reform.

              1. Mr. Soul   13 years ago

                agreed. Reality will assert itself, it always does.

        4. Paul.   13 years ago

          One ambiguous the other not an error, just fumbled in delivery

          Which, the vote for the Iraq war or the lie?

    2. Sudden   13 years ago

      My takeaway:

      Paul Ryan is a pussy.

      He needed to take the gloves off. When it comes to budgetary policy, he wins on substance, but substance matters little to the lemmings who simply want the guy that sounds like he cares (note to Ryan: take up smoking, the great unwashed think a raspy voice means "caring.") A couple of openings for him to attack that should've been hammered immediately:

      During Biden's delirious cackling before the NO2 wore off: "I'm not sure what you're laughing at Mr. Vice President, but I can assure you that the American people don't find (insert apropropo portion here/the debt/jobs/dead ambassadors/etc) funny."

      When Biden was talking about how the Ayatollahs see things he said "They see a crippled economy around them" The response should've been immediate and I saw the opening (perhaps I should be a VP, nm, I have some standards) "Well, Mr. Vice President, I will give you credit. Your administration has proven adept at crippling economies. "

      1. Sudden   13 years ago

        That wasn't supposed to be a reply to T I N Y. Oh well.

      2. Killazontherun   13 years ago

        note to Ryan: take up smoking, the great unwashed think a raspy voice means "caring

        If you have the same voice you did at fifteen, it means you haven't lived. It's a fair assumption.

        1. Killazontherun   13 years ago

          And I bathe at least once a month whether I need it or not.

        2. darius404   13 years ago

          If you have the same voice you did at fifteen, it means you haven't lived. It's a fair assumption.

          I've never smoked, yet I do not have this problem.

      3. Tulpa Doom   13 years ago

        I disagree. Biden wanted to play the bad boy and he overdid it beyond belief.

        1. Sudden   13 years ago

          Agreed a bit on the first half of the debate. But he seemed to transform into a bit more of a shrewd politician after he was able to pull the widow card. His dead wife seemed to be the turning point in the debate, the point at which he was able to restrain his anger and smugness just enough to come across as passionate.

          1. Tulpa Doom   13 years ago

            You never get a second chance to make a first impression, as they say. He was so nasty in the first part that the widow card just looked trite.

      4. John C. Randolph   13 years ago

        Paul Ryan is a pussy.

        We know he's a chickenhawk, just like Willard. I've yet to meet any chickenhawk who wasn't an abject coward at heart.

        -jcr

        1. LTC(ret) John   13 years ago

          "chickenhawk"? Did this thread just fall into a time warp back into 2004?

      5. R C Dean   13 years ago

        I didn't watch, but it sounds like Ryan did what he needed to do: look reasonably competent.

        Biden? Dunno. If his charge was to fire up the base, then he probably succeeded. If his charge was to move voters from undecided or leaning Republican to leaning Democrat, I doubt he did much.

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   13 years ago

      Tony, if Ryan had acted like Biden what would you say?

      Biden's response about Libya was outrageous in lieu of the investigation and what we're finding out.

      On that ALONE he loses.

      1. Randian   13 years ago

        Trying to reason with a partisan troll is a Sisyphean task. I recommend you abort.

      2. Sudden   13 years ago

        The thing that Ryan should've said in regards to Libya, concerning Iran.

        Your sanctions won't work for one fundamental reason: the last guy that gave up a weapons program to lessen sanctions was summarily overthrown and publicly executed by your administration six years later. It's hard to sell someone on peacefully handing over their weapons program when they see the last guy that did that get killed.

        1. gagster   13 years ago

          I agree completely. This is one of the main reasons I thought we should stay out of Libya.

          1. Mr. Soul   13 years ago

            here here!

      3. T o n y   13 years ago

        I honestly can't tell what actions of this administration deserve investigation and what is yet another Darrell Issa political witch hunt. That's the problem. Republicans are so unicellularly focused on dinging Obama politically that they make it hard to figure out what's a real problem.

        IMO I don't get what the political motivation was supposed to be for Obama, or even what the wrongdoing is supposed to be. Maybe you can explain how the words used to describe the deaths of an ambassador and others makes a difference in reality or politically.

        1. Cytotoxic   13 years ago

          unicellularly focused

          1. T o n y   13 years ago

            A flapping pseudopodium of cynicism.

          2. Tulpa MR-2012   13 years ago

            You know those Rethuglicans. They're not very evolved.

            1. Cytotoxic   13 years ago

              Tulpa MR-2012

              Who the hell are you?

              1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

                I was going through an identity crisis.

                1. darius404   13 years ago

                  I was going through an identity crisis.

                  You should definitely check out Cryptkeeper's comments in "Very Specific Malarkey: The 2012 Vice Presidential Debate" then. They're creepy, and ever-so-slightly, tangentially relevant to your "identity crisis".

                2. Corning   13 years ago

                  You better be.

                  You just told earlier tonight that deregulation would slow down the economy.

        2. PapayaSF   13 years ago

          Poor Obama! If only he didn't have the opposition focused on dinging him politically! You know, the way Democrats always refrained from dinging Republican presidents.

          1. T o n y   13 years ago

            Do you think there were too many hearings and investigations in the Bush years?

            1. OldMexican   13 years ago

              Re: Tony,

              Do you think there were too many hearings and investigations in the Bush years?

              Au contraire! There weren't nearly enough back then!

              Or now.

            2. Cytotoxic   13 years ago

              Could you be more limp and insipid?

              1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

                Don't tempt him.

            3. Bedonkedonk   13 years ago

              I think he was saying you're a hypocritical piece of shit.

          2. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

            Yes, but at least they did it eukaryotically.

        3. OldMexican   13 years ago

          Re: Tony,

          IMO I don't get what the political motivation was supposed to be for Obama, or even what the wrongdoing is supposed to be.

          Perhaps you didn't hear, but the Nobel laureate was supposed to be this great healer who would deliver Paradise to Fallen man, and the death of the ambassador kind of gives a big chink to that armor.

          1. T o n y   13 years ago

            He was?

            1. darius404   13 years ago

              I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on earth.

              1. VG Zaytsev   13 years ago

                Who the fuck would write that drivel for Obama?

                I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment...

                Seriously fucking delusional.

        4. Paul.   13 years ago

          Republicans are so unicellularly focused on dinging Obama politically that they make it hard to figure out what's a real problem.

          As a non-republican and someone who's not voting for Romney or Obama, I feel that I am uniquely qualified to tell you what's a real problem and what's not.

          Our foreign policy in the middle east and the administration's response to it, both to the Middle East and Americans at home is a big... fucking... problem.

          1. T o n y   13 years ago

            Sure, but are you saying we shouldn't have an embassy in Libya? Or should Republicans have not voted to cut embassy security? I just what to know what the scandal is supposed to be. A terrorist attack got through on Sept. 11 on Obama's watch? Okay. That exact thing only a thousand times larger made Bush a hero.

            1. Calidissident   13 years ago

              We spend almost $4 trillion dollars and we can't even protect our embassies in the most volatile and dangerous region of the world? Prioritization, ever heard of it?

            2. Corning   13 years ago

              If Obama did not have the money to defend our embassy then yes the correct course of action is to close the embassy until it is safe or until we have the money to defend it.

        5. John C. Randolph   13 years ago

          I honestly can't tell what actions of this administration deserve investigation

          Oh, that's easy. Just look up a list of shit that Eric Holder is trying to ignore.

          -jcr

        6. Rights-Minimalist Autocrat   13 years ago

          I honestly can't tell what actions of this administration deserve investigation

          That's because you're a dishonest hack.

        7. R C Dean   13 years ago

          I honestly can't tell what actions of this administration deserve investigation

          And that's why you have no credibility around here: you are so blinded by partisanship that you can't see that the utter cockup in Libya needs to be investigated.

    4. Tulpa Doom   13 years ago

      I hate to quash your budding creative wit, Tony, but that doesn't make any sense.

      1. Sudden   13 years ago

        But his hippie mother will no doubt give him a cookie and a participation ribbon after his bubble bath tonight.

        1. Randian   13 years ago

          I think that honor will go to his hipster Okie shitkicker boyfriend.

          1. LTC(ret) John   13 years ago

            "hipster Okie shitkicker"

            Isn't that some sort of Lovecraftian thing THAT SHOULD NEVER BE SAID ALOUD?

        2. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

          Fuck bubble baths. They give you UTIs.

          1. Paul.   13 years ago

            You know what else gives you UTIs?

            1. SugarFree   13 years ago

              Being a woman?

            2. Cavpitalist   13 years ago

              Words With Friends on the last rack. Fuck you, Words With Friends.

    5. Corning   13 years ago

      The straw store called. They're running out of Republican grasping.

      I have to admit Biden dominated that debate. He called Ryan on all his lies and showed us a clear path to the direction Obama means to lead our country.

      1. Red Rocks Rockin   13 years ago

        Straight down the toilet?

  7. Hugh Akston   13 years ago

    The Troll Store called and said "no receipt, no return."

  8. YinxDoo   13 years ago

    Wow this makes a lot of sense dude. WOw.
    http://www.UP-Anon.tk

    1. LTC(ret) John   13 years ago

      Now that is more like the old school anonbot we like to see!

  9. Sudden   13 years ago

    At least the Titans beat the worthless smelly yinzers. There is some good to salvage the night.

    1. Tman   13 years ago

      Yeah, I have no idea how that happened.

      But Shuisam wont be sleeping too well tonight, that's for certain.

      1. Cavpitalist   13 years ago

        Probably the 20 injuries.

        No wait, that wasn't last night, that was every game for the last two years.

  10. Tulpa Doom   13 years ago

    Wow. I expect to see some suicidal Stillers fans at work tomorrow.

    1. Randian   13 years ago

      They're obviously not dedicated if they don't follow through

      1. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

        Yes sui, no homi

  11. Calidissident   13 years ago

    Why are there so many Tulpas here?

    1. Generic Stranger   13 years ago

      Somebody violated a Japanese graveyard.

      1. Generic Stranger   13 years ago

        Err...Tibetan.

        1. Tejicano   13 years ago

          I guess you have no idea how Tibetans dispose of their dead...

          1. darius404   13 years ago

            I guess you have no idea how HARD it was to gather all those birds.

            1. darius404   13 years ago

              ... and then stuff them in a graveyard so we could violate it.

    2. Tulpa (LAOL-PA)   13 years ago

      It is the wave of the future. Join, or fade away into the mists of time like the others who oppose.

      1. Calidissident   13 years ago

        There can be only one!

  12. Sevo   13 years ago

    T o n y| 10.11.12 @ 11:43PM |#
    "I honestly can't tell what actions of this administration deserve investigation..."

    Yeah, shithead, that's because you're an ignoramus.

  13. free2booze   13 years ago

    Love the way Biden whores out the story of his dead wife and kids.

  14. BigT   13 years ago

    EU wins Nobel Peace Prize.

    What? Not Bashar al-Assad?

    http://world.time.com/2012/10/.....qus_thread

    1. LTC(ret) John   13 years ago

      Nobel Committee might as well close the shop- First O! then the EU for what?!

  15. James Anderson Merritt   13 years ago

    This GIF is truly horrific. Not a good way to start my morning. Bad Reason! Bad, Bad Reason!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Attack on the Federalist Society Is a Bad Omen for Originalism

Damon Root | 6.2.2025 3:12 PM

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

The Gutting of the National Park Service

Liz Wolfe | 6.2.2025 9:30 AM

In Dangerous Times, Train for Self-Defense

J.D. Tuccille | 6.2.2025 7:00 AM

Welcoming Anti-Trump Liberals to the Free Trade Club

Katherine Mangu-Ward | From the July 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!