Race

Can Wal-Mart Scale L.A.'s Great Wall of Regulation?

Opponents claim local Asian-Americans oppose the big-box store. Locals tell a different story.

|

They're protesting in favor of Wal-Mart.

Some of the most powerful unions in Los Angeles want to make sure that Wal-Mart doesn't have a chance of opening anytime soon in Chinatown. Perhaps they should meet some of the Chinese senior citizens who support it. I did—and with the help of a translator and my own rusty Chinese, I learned that "fresh fruit," "always low prices," and "cheap stuff" sound good in Mandarin and Cantonese, too, especially to those immigrants and seniors living near the poverty line or in assisted living centers. 

For decades, there's been nothing on the vacant first floor of the apartment complex where Wal-Mart wants to open its Chinatown store—which it hopes will be the first of many "neighborhood marts" in Los Angeles County. Slightly smaller than a Whole Foods supermarket and only one-fifth the size of a typical Wal-Mart, the 33,000 square-foot store on West Cesar Chavez Avenue would offer fresh fruits and groceries, beauty products, and—most crucially for the seniors I spoke with—a pharmacy. 

Right now, Chinatown has only one grocery store and a highly priced CVS drugstore to serve its nearly 50,000 residents. The lack of competition allows these stores to charge even more than the area's high-priced small markets for what should be cheap products like aspirin. 

In addition, many residents worry about the quality of the meat at some of the Chinese shops that Los Angeles city officials say a Wal-Mart will undercut. Indeed, all of the Chinatown residents I spoke with emphasized that at some of the Chinese markets, meats and other items are displayed on the sidewalk, exposed to the air and heat. 

During a recent visit, Ming-Sheng and Lindsey Hu invited me into their home and offered "tea eggs," a traditional Chinese delicacy, after I took off my shoes. The Hus, immigrants from China, are excited that a Wal-Mart may finally open up nearby. After showing me pictures of her grandchildren, Mrs. Hu—a lively 82 years old—proudly took me to her bathroom to see all of the Target and Wal-Mart products. Although inexpensive, they weren't easy to buy. Mrs. Hu must be driven 30 minutes by car to the Target in Alhambra, or wait for her children to take her—more than 40 minutes by car—to Rosemead's Wal-Mart. A new Wal-Mart in Chinatown would be more convenient, especially for her 86-year-old husband, who has limited mobility, and for the other residents of the Grand Plaza Senior Apartments, next to the planned Wal-Mart. 

While Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.) has decried Wal-Mart's "ability to…drive all other competitors away" with rock-bottom prices, many Chinatown residents, suffering for years from gouging by the local markets, would probably say "good riddance." In what must frustrate the unions most, the typical argument that products "Made in China" are inherently inferior doesn't work in Chinatown. "I come from China, too!" one of the old Chinese ladies protesting in favor of Wal-Mart said. "We Chinese are cheap!" another pro-Wal-Mart elderly lady told me. 

The neighborhood Chinese stores charge "whatever they think they can get," another senior said. Another problem is that most Chinatown residents must cross a busy thoroughfare to get to these markets. The Wal-Mart, in contrast, would be on the same side of the avenue—a safer, more convenient trip, especially for those with limited mobility. A resident of the Grand Plaza apartments explains that having a Wal-Mart nearby might even help save taxpayer dollars. He notes that city social workers have to come and help many of the seniors buy groceries, taking time from their other duties. In addition, the man told me through a translator, "Nobody wants to be a drain on the public."

To the Los Angeles City Council, size matters, and in this case large is bad. City Hall's anti-business attitude comes at a cost. While the City of Angels' deficit for next fiscal year is a whopping $220 million and counting, local politicians have ruled out so-called Big Box retailers.  

So Wal-Mart's proposed small neighborhood store actually complies with the city's unrealistic anti-superstore ordinance. This law, enacted in 2004, forces big-box retailers who want to open a store larger than 100,000 square feet to provide a costly economic analysis showing whether it will depress wages or harm nearby businesses. (So much for Schumpeterian creative destruction!) 

Despite the planned Chinatown store's compliance with the strict size limit, the council in late March unanimously approved a motion that would block it—suggesting that sponsor Ed Reyes and his colleagues are really against Wal-Mart, not just large outlets. Wal-Mart, however, outmaneuvered the council by obtaining its needed building permits the day before the vote. Naturally the unions, allied with the left-wing Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy (LAANE), have vowed to appeal those permits. "They've got to review the permits to determine if any errors were made," James Elmendorf, LAANE's deputy director, told the Los Angeles Times

LAANE and councilmembers Reyes and Eric Garcetti may search for "errors," but the move is so transparently unfair that even the Times' editorial page has come out against it. "Rather than presenting potential businesses with reliable rules and allowing those businesses to judge whether they can or will comply, every deal in the city is subject to negotiation," the editorial board wrote. The paper might have added that unions and allies like LAANE get to decide the terms of these negotiations. 

Part of LAANE's opposition to Wal-Mart comes from its support of what it calls a "living wage," but what they mean by that isn't at all clear—and deliberately so. According to Charles Crumpley, editor of Los Angeles Business Journal, the starting wage for a non-managerial Wal-Mart worker is $12.69 an hour. In Long Beach, LAANE wants to force hotels to pay their staffs a "living wage" of just $13 an hour. The tiny difference suggests that the organization is nickel-and-diming companies it doesn't like in the service of its union funders and allies, like the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 770 (whose members get $15.41 an hour—before dues). 

You can see how opening a Wal-Mart on that first floor would destroy L.A. as we know it.

To one Taiwan-born Chinatown resident I spoke with, the whole notion of a "living wage" is ridiculous. "Anyone can live, and live well, in America. Even the homeless here are fat," the now retired restaurateur told me with a laugh, pointing to the homeless hangout spot on Cesar Chavez. To those who came to America with nothing or very little, the notion that you can't get ahead here is offensive and false. 

Anyone who opens a retail store will tell you: It's all about location, location, location. A little poking around reveals that only one of the main opponents of the Chinatown Wal-Mart actually lives there, which makes it hard to believe LAANE's argument that it is motivated by the "neighborhood's quality of life." Sissy Trinh, head of the Southeast Asian Community Alliance, lives in Pasadena, while Chu and her husband, Democratic State Assemblyman Mike Eng, live in affluent Monterey Park. James Elmendorf and his boss, Roxana Tynan, the deputy director and executive director of LAANE, live in the Mount Washington and Highland Park neighborhoods. The "Keep Chinatown Local" slogan is a hollow one, especially when it comes from people who live where trendy grocery stores like Fresh & Easy and Trader Joe's are seemingly on every corner. 

One of the most frequently quoted anti-Wal-Mart residents is Christilily Chiv, a 2011 graduate of the University of California-Riverside, who majored in Asian Studies and now works with the leftist group Public Allies Los Angeles. "She believes in viewing the world through critical lenses and to not take everything for just the way it is," her Public Allies bio explains. That is, unless it is Wal-Mart. That's when the critical thinking seems to end. 

The strongest remarks against Wal-Mart have come from Chu, the member of Congress who has long opposed the discount giant. In 2004, while she was in the State Assembly, Chu put up a fight against a Wal-Mart in Rosemead

At the time, Chu decried Wal-Mart's "bad reputation" and claimed that local Asian-Americans and endangered small businesses were united against the retailer.

The Wal-Mart ended up opening despite Chu's efforts. The result?

"Wal-Mart helped generate $148.7 million in Rosemead citywide taxable retail sales in 2007, a $21,000 increase in such sales from the year before the store opened," Rosemead Mayor Steven Ly wrote recently in the San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Rosemead saw an increase of 9.4% in new retail permits [near Wal-Mart]." In addition, the company has been generous to Rosemead's charities, giving more than $52,000 in 2011 to the local Boy Scouts, the town's Regional Food Bank, the American Diabetes chapter, Rosemead High School, and the Rosemead Kiwanis Foundation. 

And what about Mrs. Hu? She has strong words for the people "pretending to speak for Chinatown." Sitting up straight in her chair at the mention of local Chinese-American politicians, she said: "Judy Chu and Mike Eng don't live like we do. They don't know what it's like to live here, and they don't speak for me." 

Charles C. Johnson is a writer in Los Angeles and author of a forthcoming biography of Calvin Coolidge.

Advertisement

NEXT: Don't Stand So Close to Me

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. It’s not hard to believe that LAANE truly thinks it knows what’s best for the neighborhood, more than the actual residents. That’s just the kind of thinking you need to have to be a pompous liberal.

    And why are the fucking squirrels saying this comment is invalid?

    1. Feck the unions. Drink! Arse! Girls!

  2. Who are the protesters trying to impress with signs written in Chinese? Something something China something. We something Walmart. We love something. China something happy something. These could be anti-Walmart slogans for all I know.

    1. Interesting how all those multilingualists don’t bother to rush in and translate.

      1. Umm…just because you speak another language doesn’t mean you speak all languages.

        1. Tell that to the multilingualists who speak what they like and try to dictate to the rest of us what we should speak. Maobama is a monolingualist who likes to lecture on that.

          1. Tell that to the multilingualists who speak what they like and try to dictate to the rest of us what we should speak. Maobama is a monolingualist who likes to lecture on that.

            ?

            Since you’re getting into “Whitney Houston was SACRIFICED by the ILLUMINATI for the Jubilee of the Queen Elizabeth!” territory…I’m just going to walk away and leave you to your own fantasy world.

            1. They are right. You really are insane.

              1. I’m insane says the ugly, hairy Italian dude who masquerades as a quasi-attractive petite Asian woman.

                Go fuck yourself, Johnny T.

            2. I heard the queen is actually a lizard.

              A multilingual French speaking lizard.

      2. I did my best. But they should have written their signs in Spanish so everyone could understand. The handwritting is varried, so more than one person wrote the signs.

  3. There is nothing more democratic than letting people decide at which shops they want to buy. The people who say they support democracy don’t seem to support the will of the people when it comes to Wal mart.

    1. Since it is self-evidently true that Walmart and everything it stands for is evil, the ‘will of people’ must be understood as ‘what people would want if they weren’t so brainwashed by Madison Avenue or morally corrupted by Wall Street or mis-informed by people not as enlightened as me’.

      IOW – the only reason you could support Walmart (or capitalism or liberty for that matter) and oppose the benevolent instruction of your intellectual and moral superiors is if you are crazy, evil or stupid.

      And we all know crazy people need psychiatric prisons, evil people need gulag, and stupid people need re-education camps.

      Laugh all you want, but between Ralph Nader, the CDC, the trial lawyers and the bargain-brand Mussolinis all over, we are getting closer every day to having everything Bad For You being declared a public-health issue and therefore amenable to legislation.

      First they came for the cokeheads, and I didn’t speak out because I was not a cokehead. Then they came for the smokers, and I didn’t speak out because I was not a smoker. Then they came for the fatties, and I did not speak out because I was not a fatty. When they came for the soylent green….

      1. This.

        What you want is none of your business and certainly nothing that you can be trusted to determine for yourself. When (if) it becomes relevant, the “neighborhood” activists will inform you of what it is.

      2. Geez Jerryskids, are you trying to be ironic or are you serious? Your last sentence doesn’t include “they came for Walmart and Walmart shoppers”.

        If you are serious, then based on your post, you’d support government sending you to a re-education camp.

        Fortunately for you, libertarians would defend you against that, rather than using government to come after you.

  4. I wouldn’t be surprised if the same sort of regulation keeps Walmarts from popping up more around DC. There are only 3 I know of within 15 miles of the district’s tainted nutsack on the NOVA side, and all 3 are perpetually swamped and dirty. As a result, it’s nigh-impossible to keep yourself from taking one of their cheap guns and blowing your head off as you wait in the forever-line to buy said gun behind granny who wants to pay in old confederate toilet paper. There are Targets well within the tainted nutsack (beltway) but, as usual, they are generally more expensive. If I didn’t know any better, I’d think there was some sort of elitist attitude against Walmart that favors Target among our betters because the latter is not seen as a den on inequity for some reason. One more thing, FUCK NOVA. Oh and 40 % of MD can go to hell as well.

    1. One of the very few things that Cherry Hill has over DC, Walmart. The Philly area must have 20 of them. Only downside, closest 3 to me do not have a grocery section.

      I remember the NOVA Walmart I went to was very nice. Out near IAD in Sterling or Ashburn.

  5. This law, enacted in 2004, forces big-box retailers who want to open a store larger than 100,000 square feet to provide a costly economic analysis showing whether it will depress wages or harm nearby businesses.

    So, you can only open a business if it won’t be competitive. Riiiiight. No wonder the state is a fucking basket case

    1. Competitive? We must have equality, it is only fair. Why are you such a racist? Where is Tiny to tell us how rich people make other people poor? He can explain it to you.

      God, I fucking hate socialists with every fiber of my being.

      1. I’m not a fan of socialists, but at least they are more honest than Neocons for the most part. They’ll tell you to their face they want you as a slave. Neocons say free market this, liberty that, and then gleefully double-fist-rape us all when our guard is down. If I’m going to get prison-raped, I’d prefer the prospective rapist to be honest about his intentions…so I have time to build a shank to embed in the asshole’s brain stem.

        1. Show me a neocon, and I’ll show you a big government liberal who opposes abortion.

          1. I thought the NeoCons where the Hawkish Democrats who supported the Reagan back in the 80’s and then “War on Terror” that we are in the middle of now. Abortion? Really?

        2. I grew up surrounded by Neocons, and I hate them as well. I have argued with them and fought against them all my life. I suppose I know how to deal with them better because I understand them.
          The naked dumbfuckery and sociopathic compulsion to control others and steal everything is what makes me hate socialists so much. Their agenda is to enslave the entire human race.

          1. But, but, but it isn’t stealing when the government does it!
            /snark

        3. There’s plenty of hypocrisy on both sides. Surely we all know “pro-choice” people who are fanatically anti-choice on about 99% of human endeavor.

    2. The ever changing ‘definition’ of “big box stored.” Walmart is a department store, Sams Club is big box (membership required). “costly economic analysis showing whether it will depress wages” is this Krugmanomics? How does adding competition for labor depress wages?

        1. Suki made a simple typo, Suki, don’t be a peckerhead about it.

      1. Do you think that the mom-and- pop stores all pay their help high wages? I would guess most of their workers are under-the table on a student visa.

  6. …seniors living near the poverty line or in assisted living centers.

    IPAB will fix this problem soon enough.

  7. Me ruv WarMalt RONG time.

    It needed to be said.

    Also, fuck California.

  8. The only Chinese American guy I know is virulently anti-communist and believes in perpetually printing and burning Mao portraits, so maybe I’m not as informed as Mr. and Mrs. Progressive Protectionist Racket, but none of this is at all surprising. It’s the government in Los Angeles. Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, NYC — they’re all in a league of their own when it comes to dumbfuckery.

    1. Sounds like the Chinese American has been traumatized by the Chinese government. Most people who’ve lived in other than the US, much prefer liberty. Like my better half who lived in Cuba for awhile, she was mugged by the reality of government control.

  9. Preventing access to cheap goods makes people richer.

  10. NOT THAT CHARLES JOHNSON!

  11. Forget it, Jake. It’s Cronytown.

    1. You were not brought upon this earth to get a Walmart!

  12. Sometimes you just have to throw your hands in the air and hollar Whos your Daddy!

    http://www.Gimme-Privacy.tk

    1. well said, anonbot, well said

  13. Open question to other posters;

    Does anybody recall a statement by anti-WalMart activists about a group that supposedly didn’t want the company to open a store that turned out to be true?

  14. “The neighborhood Chinese stores charge ‘whatever they think they can get,’ another senior said.”

    So does Wal-Mart.

    Meet the new bloss…

  15. This is totally crazy that people are so against something that the people want. we have the same problem here in San Diego. Everyone seems to be against Wal-Mart (and by everyone, I mean unions and the politicians who are “supported” by them). Give the people what they want…Choices!!!

  16. In some cases, governments are using eminent domain to give property to private developers, with the public benefit being potential increased tax revenues.

    Government helping some private businesses, and hindering other private businesses, certainly isn’t equality before the law. If they were consistent, they’d use eminent domain to provide the land to Walmart for the tax revenues.

    1. Given it was Democrats who mainly supported Kelo vs. City of New London, what conservatives should have done, is say if the SCOTUS ruled for the government, they were going to use eminent domain to obtain land for more Walmarts. Then perhaps Democrats would learn the lesson that when you give government power, it will be used against you.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.