Reason Writers Around Town: Jacob Sullum on the NYPD's New Pot Policy in the New York Daily News
In today's New York Daily News, Senior Editor Jacob Sullum tells the tale of the new pot policy recently announced by New York's police commissioner:
Last week, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly issued a directive that instructs officers to stop arresting people for publicly displaying marijuana after tricking them into committing that offense. Well, that's not quite the way he put it.
According to Kelly, he was merely reminding the city's cops that "the public display of marijuana must be an activity undertaken of the subject's own volition," and that the charge is not legally appropriate "if the marijuana recovered was disclosed to public view at an officer's discretion."…
By the police commissioner's own account, arrests in these circumstances are illegal, which means that most of the 350,000 or so pot smokers busted on his watch were wrongly detained, wrongly jailed, wrongly booked and wrongly saddled with criminal justice records and all the attendant expense, inconvenience and humiliation. In these circumstances, nearly a decade into a pot bust binge overseen by Kelly, asking police to try to follow the law from now on seems rather inadequate.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So Kelly's directive is a bid to make this change in the law unnecessary.
""So Kelly's directive is a bid to make this change in the law unnecessary.""
Not the way I see it. If Kelly can prevent it becoming law, then he gets to decide who gets arrested for pot.
It's just an authoritarian defending his turf.
It seems we see it the same way.
Why change the law to better reflect a system of justice when you can just issue a directive based on executive opinion at the time?
That directive can be quiely rescinded at will by a single individual.
Well . . . yeah. That's the whole point, in the event you missed the handle.