Guess Which Became the Largest Circulation California Daily to Editorialize in Favor of Prop. 19?
Hint: It's also the newspaper with the most reviled owner in the state. And thanks to one of California's single most asinine web publishing strategies, all the Santa Barbara News-Press can show you is the headline: "Yes on Prop. 19: It is time to legalize marijuana in California."
Thanks to alert commenter Larry. Work your way backward to previous Prop. 19 editorial-blogging here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Maybe that’s the whole editorial.
Maybe the editorial board suddenly got the munchies. Am I right, opinion editors over at the Modesto Bee? High five!
Allen St. Pierre vs Asa Hutchison on tomorrow’s Washington Journal. Probably goes off at 7:45 Eastern. cspanwj hasn’t had a legalization segment for months. This might be the only one before prop 19 passes.
I was actually hoping to go there when I was on WJ this week, but the interrogation went elsewhere.
Your performance on bloggingheads was aces and represented a turning point in the history of our otherwise irredeemable country.
P-p, I can’t believe you just described something–anything–as “aces.” Also, could you possibly suck up a little more?
And thanks to one of California’s single most asinine
That’s like saying something is “partially unique”, Matt. Pick either “one of” or “single most”.
/grammar pedant
You are correct.
/grammar pedant
Intensifiers don’t denote.
/pedantry pedant
I have no idea what you meant by that. Link? Explanation?
Ahh, don’t worry about it Prole, none of the rest of us understand ANY of the pedantry posts, so it is all good.
“…and show it to any friends and loved ones interested in attacking problems that actually matter, rather than ones that make for pointless culture-war clashes in the run-up to an election.”
Why is Welch and Reason expending so many precious electrons supporting a pointless culture war clash instead of the problems that actually matter?
I think he’s worried about Reason’s immense carbon footprint.
Was alcohol prohibition a pointless culture war clash instead of a problem that actually mattered?
I wonder if this has anything to do with the fact that the fold out this week was a rolling paper.