California

L.A. Medical Pot Scene: Still the "Wild, Wild West" at Least 'Til Next Week

|

Attended an L.A. City Council meeting today in which it was rumored they would actually vote on a proposed ordinance to finalize a set regulatory structure for a situation that both enemies of medical pot and even many of its friends consider an out-of-control free-for-all of allegedly 800-1,000 medi-pot emporiums in the city. (The phrase "wild west" to apply to L.A. and its interestingly, and accidentally, free-wheeling regulatory approach, so far, to medical dispensaries becomes a tired cliche quickly when you listen to enough people complain about it.)

The whole story of L.A. and medical pot is long and complicated–and will be told at appropriate length in an upcoming Reason magazine feature–and for now it is continuing.

Today, after many hours of public comment and councilperson jousting with William Carter from the City Attorney's office–who says, although the councilpeople don't wanna hear it, that any sort of sale of pot in a medical dispensary is inherently illegal–the Council decided to put off a vote on the currently proposed ordinance.

They punted until at least early next week while they hash over various proposed amendments and try to get a consensus. Issues brought up by various councilpeople about ways they want to think about adjusting the ordinance include: figuring out ways to squeeze more money out of the dispensaries; how or whether to grandfather in the 186 dispensaries that already registered under a previous regulatory regime; demands regarding how much cash the dispensaries can have on hand; how accessible patient records will be to cops; and whether they will need to be 500 feet away from any other medical or pharmaceutical location.

It seems clear to me that the council intends to ignore the advice of their attorney and authorize sales in some respect, though not for profit sales. They also seem certain to cap the total number of legal dispensaries, though whether it will be approximately 70 (a number many of them liked, from a city planner) or as many as 400 (argued for by some medical pot activists) remains to be seen. Developing, as they say.

For some background on L.A. and its contentious relationship with medical pot, see Jacob Sullum from yesterday on the council's willingness to defy their city attorney, and on their D.A.'s concomitant willingness to defy them. See also me from my California news and politics blog "City of Angles" here (focused on the current legal wranglings) and here (explaining how a past attempt at a pot shop "moratorium" in fact more than tripled the number in operation in L.A.).

Advertisement

NEXT: Roubini: Jobs Are Dead, Long Live Jobs

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. My My Hey Hey,

    Mary Jane is here to stay.

  2. who exactly attended this LA City Council Meeting Brian?

  3. both enemies of medical pot and even many of its friends consider an out-of-control free-for-all of allegedly 800-1,000 medi-pot emporiums in the city.

    And we can’t have that. This is a drug, to be regulated, stamped, approved, reviewed and watched by all levels of government. Afterall, this is legalized pot, not that stuff you weren’t allowed to have before, but had anyway- and by virtue of that, could do whatever you wanted with it.

    1. If legal drugs are going to be such a pain in the ass, then keep them illegal.
      At least they are cheap and available under current prohibition. Let the feds fumble around with interdiction, keeps their hands out of the honey pot.

  4. Do you think media coverage in the U.S. is biased? We are looking for people interested in politics to take our Institutional Research Board approved study.

    Many people feel that the media can lead people in different ideological directions. We are Smith College students in a Senior Political Psychology Seminar and we want to invite you to take our survey. We are investigating the relationship between media coverage and political information. If you take our short, confidential survey you can choose to be entered into a raffle for a $50 gift certificate to Amazon.com. If you are interested, follow this link to Surveymonkey.com

    http://www.surveymonkey.com/s……lKxA_3d_3d

  5. an out-of-control free-for-all of allegedly 800-1,000 medi-pot emporiums in the city

    You say bug, I say feature.

  6. Unless there is gunplay/shootouts between different dispensaries (“Dude, this town, like, isn’t big enough for the both of us.”), how exactly is it “Wild, Wild West”?

  7. “Dude, this town, like, isn’t big enough for the both of us.”

    Anyone who gets that quote into an actual movie wins the thread.

  8. What exactly is the problem with consenting adults partaking in marijuana? Is there any legimate reason for a ban? If so, should we outlaw cigarettes, alcohol, fast food? How about a system of freedom and personal responsibility (for better or worse)?

  9. People need to embrace some change! How many liquor stores are in L.A.?

    You really see the societal double standards with the MMJ issue(s). Its a real throwback to the puritans. With all the extensive research being surpressed and law enforcement doing what they want despite what the people voted for, some of us find the whole thing very frustrating!!!

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.