Fund Transfer Protocol
States eye Internet sales
The principles of federalism embodied in the Constitution are more than a vital check on overweening power; they're a great source of online discounts.
Because Congress has power over interstate commerce, the courts have thus far ruled that a state cannot require businesses that lack a physical "nexus" in the state to collect sales taxes, meaning goods bought online are, for practical purposes, tax free. All that may change under the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Act, versions of which have been introduced in both the House and Senate, which would empower states to create a compact—already being formed—establishing common rules for reciprocal tax collection and remittance.
In an October editorial, The Wall Street Journal suggested that such an agreement might give rise to a national sales tax. That, says Cato Institute Director of Telecommunication Studies Adam Thierer, could undermine healthy tax competition between states. If Internet sales are to be taxed, suggests Thierer, states should adopt a uniform rule of taxing goods at the point of origin, rather than enforcing a single rate or taxing in the state where goods are consumed.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
rtdg