Justice Gorsuch Wants To Hear More (Takings) Cases
Justice Gorsuch shows more interest in property rights challenges than his colleagues on the Court.
Justice Gorsuch shows more interest in property rights challenges than his colleagues on the Court.
The Court's decision to overturn Chevron should be seen as more of a "course correction" than a revolution. (Updated with Video.)
His criticism of President Joe Biden’s proposed Supreme Court reform is hard to take seriously.
Her concurrence is a reminder that the application of criminal law should not be infected by personal animus toward any given defendant.
There is a great deal of panic surrounding the "extreme" nature of the current Court. But that is often not based in reality.
Paul Erlinger was sentenced to 15 years in prison based largely on a determination made by a judge—not a jury.
Yet another case that Justice Kavanaugh would like to hear that does not interest enough of his colleagues.
Not all of the justices are happy about the Court's stingy approach to certiorari.
Justice Kavanaugh continues to support granting certiorari in cases his colleagues do not wish to hear.
Justice Kavanaugh was alone in noting his desire to accept certiorari in two cases the justices rejected.
Today's opinions are a requel to prior splits among the most recent Republican appointees to the Supreme Court.
Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh addressed questions on a range of questions at a recent Notre Dame symposium.
The Court told appeals courts to reconsider their conclusions in light of last week's ruling against New York's restrictions on public possession of firearms.
National legislation and extraterritorial application of state laws are inconsistent with the local leeway that the Constitution protects.
He also nixes the idea that states could "retroactively impose liability or punishment for an abortion that occurred before today's decision takes effect."
“Properly interpreted, the Second Amendment allows a ‘variety’ of gun regulations,” Kavanaugh writes, invoking Antonin Scalia
Police stopped him a block away from Kavanaugh's Chevy Chase home, where he allegedly admitted he was there to kill the justice.
The Supreme Court continues to shield federal officers who are accused of violating constitutional rights.
Plus: Who's bringing fentanyl across the border? Will Austin become a sanctuary city for abortion? And more...
A federal lawsuit argues that the department's regulations violate due process, the separation of powers, and the First Amendment.
Xiulu Ruan, a pain specialist, was sentenced to 21 years in federal prison for prescribing opioid analgesics "outside the usual course of professional medical practice."
Plus: Elon Musk's plans for Twitter, officials want to tax NFTs, and more...
Gorsuch just penned an important pro-LGBT decision two years ago. Americans are largely not interested in relitigating this issue.
Plus: Boston rebuked for rejecting Christian flag, Google will remove more personal information, and more...
The justices unanimously agree that the city was not endorsing the flags, and that therefore it couldn’t exclude religious organizations.
Plus: The roots of the housing crisis, the U.S. Supreme Court reconsiders Miranda warnings, a judge halts Kentucky's abortion law, and more...
The previous standard barring such lawsuits made “little sense," wrote Justice Brett Kavanaugh for the majority.
Although a Texas Supreme Court ruling ended the main challenge to the law, other cases could ultimately block its enforcement.
All of this is a transparent effort to stop lawsuits from those who have been tortured.
The Supreme Court is considering what standard should apply to prescribers accused of violating the Controlled Substances Act.
Contrary to some of the more breathless reactions, it doesn't suggest a conspiracy to help Republicans win elections by disenfranchising black voters.
The justice grilled a Texas official over the implications of his state’s abortion law.
“Our only job today, is to give the law’s terms their ordinary meanings and, in that small way, ensure that the federal government does not exceed its statutory license.”
Two centuries of precedents say the president is not immune from judicial process.
The Supreme Court weighs the legality of subpoenaing Trump’s financial records.
Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and double standards, as discussed on the Reason Roundtable podcast.
Dean Baquet's argument for proceeding cautiously with Joe Biden but not with Brett Kavanaugh isn't very persuasive.
Under fire for refusing to support Tara Reade, Milano says she never thought #MeToo would "destroy innocent men."
A former staffer says he sexually assaulted her in 1993.
An important development in the legal wrangling over the separation of powers.
The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation doesn't shed much light on the Supreme Court justice or the allegations against him.
Plus: Attacks on Saudi Arabia unlikely to raise U.S. oil prices
Plus: Andrew Yang opts out of cancel culture, Andrew Cuomo wants to crack down on flavored e-cigarettes, and more...
“The Court usually reads statutes with a presumption of rationality and a presumption of constitutionality.”
The high court ruled that prosecutor Doug Evans violated Flowers' constitutional rights when Evans sought to keep African-Americans off of the jury.
Understanding today’s Supreme Court decision in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren
If Kavanaugh is a committed originalist, you would never know it based on his complacent behavior in Timbs v. Indiana.
Some students want GMU to #CancelKavanaugh. Some professors want the school to investigate the justice.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10