The Volokh Conspiracy
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
Three Years Worth of Blogging on California v. Texas
A handy index of my writing on this improbable ACA challenge.
From the outset of California v. Texas (indeed, before California was involved in the case), I have commented on the legal merits (or lack thereof) of the arguments presented in the case. After an initial teleforum debate with Misha Tseytlin, then Solicitor General of Wisconsin, I have blogged repeatedly on the various arguments and developments in the case. For those interested, I have indexed my blog posts (and a few op-eds) here. Perhaps I will fold all of this into a law review article. Perhaps not. In the meantime, the posts are below.
- The Clever Red State Lawsuit Against the Individual Mandate, and the Justice Department's Disappointing Response—6/11/18
- Strange Bedfellows Join on Severability in the Latest ACA Case—6/14/18
- How Do the States Have Standing to Challenge an Unenforced and Unenforceable Mandate?—6/15/18
- An Obamacare Case So Wrong It Has Provoked a Bipartisan Outcry (w/ Abbe Gluck), New York Times, 6/19/18
- Meanwhile, in a Texas Courtroom, Is the ACA in Trouble?—9/6/18
- BREAKING: District Court Judge in Texas Holds ACA Is Unlawful—12/14/18
- What the Lawless Obamacare Ruling Means (w/ Abbe Gluck), New York Times, 12/15/18
- Understanding Why Judge O'Connor Was Wrong to Conclude Plaintiffs Had Standing to Challenge the Penalty-Less Individual Mandate—12/21/18
- Court Stays Ruling Invalidating the Affordable Care Act Pending Appeal—12/31/18
- Justice Department Revises Its Position in Texas ACA Case—3/25/19
- Does Anyone Support DOJ's Position in the Texas ACA Case?—3/29/19
- Another Round of Strange Bedfellows on Severability in Texas v. U.S.—4/1/19
- Fifth Circuit Adds New Wrinkle to Texas ACA Case—6/26/19
- The ACA Cases Continue—7/1/19
- On the Eve of Oral Argument in Texas v. U.S.—7/8/19
- Where Is the Fifth Circuit's Opinion in the Texas ACA Case? [Updated]—12/16/19
- BREAKING: Fifth Circuit Declares Individual Mandate Unconstitutional, Punts on Whether Rest of ACA Must Fall (Updated)—12/18/19
- Can Courts Consider Severability Before Other Questions?—1/22/20
- Red State Challenge to Affordable Care Act Goes to SCOTUS (But the Arguments Remain Incredibly Weak) (Updated)—3/2/20
- Will the Trump Administration Finally Abandon Its Bizarre Position in the Texas ACA Case? (Update: No)–5/5/20
- The Penalty-less Individual Mandate Is Severable from the Rest of the ACA No Matter How You Look at It.–5/14/20
- SCOTUS Expands Texas ACA Case Oral Argument—8/24/20
- How Judge Barrett Ruled in the Texas ACA Case—10/2/20
- The ACA's Legislative Findings Do Not Constitute an "Inseverability Clause"—10/3/20
- Would Justice Barrett Be Required to Recuse in the Texas ACA Case?—10/3/20
- Standing to Challenge the Individual Mandate—11/9/20
- On the Eve of Oral Argument in California v. Texas–11/9/20
- Live Blogging California v. Texas (Updated)–11/10/20
- Biden Administration Reverses DOJ Position in Texas ACA Case - 2/10/21
- The Risks to the ACA of a Standing Decision in California v. Texas Are Overstated (Updated)–2/25/21
- BREAKING: SCOTUS Holds 7-2 Texas Lacks Standing to Press Obamacare Claim (Updated) - 6/17/21
- What the Supreme Court Got Right (and Justice Alito Got Wrong) in the Texas ACA Decision - 6/17/21
- Would Justice Alito Have Struck Down the GOP Obamacare Replacement? - 6/18/21
- Why the Texas ACA Suit Was Always Destined to Fail (Even on a 6-3 Court) - 6/19/21
- Collins, California, and Standing-as-Usual: A Response to Josh Blackman - 6/26/21
- Courthouse Steps Podcase on California v. Texas - 7/5/21
- California v. Texas on Remand - 7/23/21
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Here is 3 seconds' worth. My deductible went from $500 a year to $8000 the next. Obama took my insurance and gave it to the tax sucking parasites that cheated him into office. He left me with catastrophic coverage at double the cost.
So you should support universal single payer health care. Which is actually what Obama wanted but couldn't get through Congress.
That is the nightmare scenario, the path to Euro Commie Care. Read the Royal Commission Report. It took 45 minutes to get Princess Diana out of her crashed car. She was conscious and talking. No Jaws of Life, $500 used on EBay. Commie scumbags took 1.5 hours to get her to the hospital 4 miles away at midnight, no traffic. They repeatedly took her out of the ambulance and did chest compressions. You do not do chest compressions on a crash victim. Commie Care killed Princess Diana. No helicopter. No telemetry for a cardiologist to remotely review. No specialized trauma team waiting for her arrival in the OR. In the poorest, shittiest county in the US, her injuries were eminently survivable. Get cancer in Europe, die on a waiting list. It is great if you are healthy and need an employment physical, vaccination, or break an arm. Any expensive care, and you're dead.
The best is a Health Savings Account, to be invested in an Index Fund with no decisions allowed by the owner. Even the poorest person gets $3500 a year into an account from birth, with a deductible of $25000 for catatrophic care from the government. The person does his own prior authorizations, not an insurance company, for most care, with its 20% overhead. Die healthy, the heirs get $millions. That cuts the 20% overhead, the 10% defensive medicine cost, incentivizes healthy living, for cash.
That goes the same for Social Security. Put the contributions in an Index Fund with no decisions allowed. The monthly retirement or disability payment is triple that of the dumbass federal government. It does nothing well. Why is that? Because it is a wholly owned subsidiary of the lawyer profession. These are the stupidest people in the country. Replace them with Life Skills students, learning to eat with a spoon, for an immediate upgrade in decision making and in clarity of the writing. This toxic occupation is in utter failure in everything it does. It has only one great success, the seeking of the rent. It takes our $trillion at the point of a gun, and returns nothing of value.
Present a lawyer utterance and behavior to a psychologist, for a diagnosis. Asperger. Endless chatter for no reason, incomprehensible, and meaningless. Obesssion with irrelevant detail. Will not shut up. Will not leave you alone. Garbage chatter unrelated to reality, or to any human relatedness. Diagnose it for yourself.
https://www.autism-society.org/what-is/aspergers-syndrome/
That's a really good description of most of your posts here, Daivd.
Fallacy of Irrelevance. Try a substantive comment for a change of pace.
I give you the Royal Commission Report, Chapter Eight – Post-Crash Medical Treatment of Diana. You give me a personal remark.
No, I remarked on the quality of your posts.
You have no substantive reply.
Daivd, it is possible that in person you are intelligent, well spoken, thoughtful and not mentally ill. Unfortunately, if that is the case, it's impossible to tell from your comments.
Hi, KryKry. Have a blessed day.
This blog just gets better and better.
Artie, come 2024, start shopping the Caracas apartment. Agents of the Chinese Commie Party will be cancelled.