The Political Lies That Really Matter
From George Santos to Joe Biden, résumé padding is unacceptable. But it's all the lies about legislation we can't afford.
HD DownloadNewly elected New York congressman George Santos has "apologized" after getting caught lying about where he went to high school and whether he graduated from college. And where he worked after not graduating from college. And whether he is Brazilian. And Jewish. And whether his grandparents actually fled the Holocaust. And whether his mother died on 9/11.
Santos—who says he won't resign—is an extreme case, but résumé padding is nothing new in Washington. Who can forget Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren's fraudulent—and ultimately apologized-for—claims of Native-American heritage? She apparently even plagiarized the "Cherokee recipes" she contributed to a 1984 cookbook called Pow Wow Chow.
There are folks like Sen. Dick Blumenthal (D.–Conn.), who lied about serving in Vietnam during a tight race but then claimed he didn't really do anything wrong because he only misspoke on multiple occasions and not all the time.
And of course, there's President Joe Biden, who dropped out of his 1988 presidential bid after he was caught lying about his own distinguished academic record. Incredibly, he even plagiarized the life story of a British politician whose family were coal miners. (Biden's were not.)
When politicians invent accomplishments and lie about their pasts, it reflects poorly on their character and shows an incredibly disturbing willingness to cheat in the pursuit of power. But the most harmful falsehoods that politicians tell aren't about the scholarships they didn't win, wars they didn't fight, or discrimination they didn't overcome.
They're about the laws they pass. Consider last summer's stupendously misnamed Inflation Reduction Act, which the president announced would shrink the budget deficit and reduce rising prices. Even outlets sympathetic to Biden weren't buying that.
What the bill actually does is create a vast number of complicated tax breaks and incentives aimed at "greening" the economy. It raises taxes enough to reduce the deficit by around $300 billion, which is just 2 percent of planned borrowing over the next 10 years. It does nothing to reduce our $30 trillion in debt.
Who is loaning the U.S. government those funds? The Federal Reserve mostly, which pays for all those treasury bonds by printing money out of thin air, the principal cause of inflation. Far from reducing deficits, Biden is making the government's long-term balance sheet worse: When he took office, the 10-year deficit was expected to be $12.21 trillion. By the end of his first year, it had climbed to a projected $14.5 trillion.
He has also misrepresented his record on job creation, tweeting in September, "Right now, I have the strongest record of growing manufacturing jobs in modern history." As The Washington Post's Glenn Kessler pointed out, Richard Nixon beats Biden handily on that count, with 1.3 million new manufacturing jobs back in the early 1970s compared to Biden's 630,000.
Biden also promised that he would end his predecessor's use of Title 42 rules to keep migrants from Latin America from entering the country while seeking asylum here. His flip-flop on that that has alienated even his supporters.
Of course, Joe Biden hardly invented political lying, especially among presidents. His recent predecessors in the Oval Office lied about everything everywhere all at once (Donald Trump), health care policy (Barack Obama), pretexts for war and torture, (George W. Bush), and sex (Bill Clinton).
From newly minted congressmen like George Santos to the president, we've come to expect—and maybe even accept—that our politicians are going to lie about their resumes and their personal lives. That's totally unacceptable.
But it's the lies about their policies that we end up really paying for—and that we really can't afford.
Produced by Nick Gillespie and Justin Zuckerman; Sound editing by Ian Keyser; Additional graphics by Danielle Thompson and Isaac Reese
Credits: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom; CNP/AdMedia/SIPA/Newscom; KEN CEDENO/UPI/Newscom; Rod Lamkey - CNP/Newscom; PAT BENIC/UPI/Newscom; Cliff Owen - CNP/picture alliance / Consolidated News Photos/Newscom; CNP/AdMedia/Newscom; Michael Brochstein/Sipa USA/Newscom; Alex Edelman - Pool via CNP / MEGA / Newscom/RSSIL/Newscom; Chris Kleponis - CNP/Newscom
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If they “cooperate “ after getting caught, well it’s ok then..
So much for libertarian free speech eh Reason.
If you can’t refute it, just delete it. 25 comments deleted. Hahaha.
Let’s try again.
What lies do we need?
All lying is COERCION, compelling others under the false authority of truth to act in the liars interest instead of their own.
We have already learned the hard way that lies need to be criminalized in court, to realize justice and in contracts to enable all trade in our economy.
Now with more communication than ever before in history, LIES are making communication little more than white noise. Nobody trusts anyone or anything.
It’s time that we must criminalize all lying in communication.
It will solve most of our problems with added benefits hahaha.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://Www.workstar24.com
.. lied about everything everywhere all at once….
Just LOL
Six years later and they're still butthurt over losing a game of Trivial Pursuit to Trump over "Jerusalem".
Liars, damn liars, and politicians.
+++
+1
Does this mean no more Sullum TDS articles? I bet not.
The solution to the problem of George Santos is his state. It's up to the voters in his district to recall him, and his state for providing a recall mechanism.
It is NOT up to the rest of the country to expel him, it is NOT up to congress to expel him, etc. That's not how our system works. And for good reason. A representative should not be subject to the veto of those outside his district.
Especially when his only crime was getting caught at what the rest of Congress considers business as usual.
Yes, Santos is a despicable animal. And he's a duly elected congressman. But I repeat myself.
Certainly the House can expel him. It requires a two-thirds vote. They can also censure him.
I’m agree with the right, frankly moral obligation to censure him BUT not the power of “the in crowd” to toss him – he’s NY’s problem. Curious now why the Democrats are pressing for Biden to flee the scene – he has a rich, deep history of shameless lying about all manner of things during his many decades in the den of corruption that seems a fair assessment of DC. Ever see a DC denizen who left without greatly enriching himself/family/friends from the public trough?
The fact that I have even a few articles in the Woke MSM, about his numerous transgressions, just smells like they are looking for the least destructive (to them of course) way to do so - throw some fuel on the trash pile and see if others will do their dirty work for them.
Why am I so cynical? Maybe just Awake rather than Woke. And I am an equal opportunity critic - really want to see Trump's EGO very far away in the rear view mirror. Appreciate the good things his policies did BUT my loyalty is to our future success, not to Trump's EGO!
"His recent predecessors in the Oval Office lied about everything everywhere all at once (Donald Trump)"
But these guys can never seem to find a specific Trump lie when pressed. Instead they'll point out braggadocio, exaggeration and blowhard boasts but never actual lies.
Joe on the other hand plagiarized a law school paper and a major speech,
claimed he had a full academic law school scholarship and was the only person to get one,
claimed he graduated top of his class,
claimed he was the first in his family to graduate college,
claimed he won international Moot Court competition,
claimed he graduated with three degrees,
claimed his son Beau died in Iraq,
claimed he had been to Iraq 40 times,
claimed he was a civil rights warrior, was arrested at a civil rights protest, and was arrested with Nelson Mandela in South Africa,
claimed he faced down a gang leader named "Corn Pop",
claimed he was appointed to the Naval Academy,
claimed he was a truck driver,
claimed he grew up in a Puerto Rican community,
claimed he spoke to the "inventor" of insulin,
claimed his house burned down,
claimed he was shot at overseas,
claimed he visited the Tree of Life synagogue,
claimed he was a full professor at UPenn,
claimed his Uncle received a purple heart,
claimed his grandfather was a coal miner,
claimed he was a college football star,
claimed a drunk driver killed his family,
ad nauseam...
But Reason(s) is bravely "Both Sides".
claimed he faced down a gang leader named “Corn Pop”
It was one little fight, then he had to move in with his auntie and uncle in Wilmington.
The Fake Prince of Brandywine.
Trump is a filthy, pathological chud liar and anything that comes out of his mouth needs to be fact-checked vigorously. Biden is…well, folksy! He just likes to spin yarn. You know, shave the factual edges off things to make them easier to be heard.
Well intentioned.
And this attitude is exactly what lead to the classified docs discrepancy.
Without almost any information, all of the media instantly knew "Well Biden's wasnt as bad, certainly there was no ill intent" despite it being objectively worse on its face; one man had the ability to declassify things as president, one had no such power.
Is that where Corn Pop comes from? That is fucking hilarious
"But these guys can never seem to find a specific Trump lie when pressed. Instead they’ll point out braggadocio, exaggeration and blowhard boasts but never actual lies."
Ditto Tony's claim that Trump is "the worst criminal to ever hold office!!!!"
Crime(s), please?
-crickets-
And this (pace Brandyshit) is not an official elected by district.
the score of the Outed Elected Liars Maintaining Office is still like (D) 14 – 1 (R) lol
"If you get this thing (the vaccine) you aren't going to get COVID! Arent going to transmit it!"
Joe Biden, in the context of him having an unconstitutional requirement for employees to get mandatory experimental injections.
That's treason enough right there, to the constitution and the people. Hang him
Links to Washington Post for a record of Trump’s “lies.” Good Christ.
Well, we can't have our politicians lying about the height of hamburgers now, can we?
The Post's Trump Lie List is almost as bad as Politico's. They took a bunch of wishes, prognostications, turns of phrase, and colloquialisms, literalized them and then called them lies.
"Trump called Melania his 'significant other', but there's no evidence that she's any more significant than ex-wife Ivana. We rate this lie five Pinocchio's."
"Trump claimed it was 'Hotter than hell', but there's no evidence hell exists, and traditionally it was a lake of fire which is hotter than the 103 degrees at the Washington airport that day. We rate this lie five Pinocchio's."
The gaslighting is so obvious I've come to the conclusion that their readers didn’t actually care.
They just wanted their biases and hatreds reconfirmed so that they could feel smug and superior and be imbued with righteous indignation.
There's a reason CNN's ratings continue to drop, and there has been a major pitch regarding "America's Mayor"; those ratings will be of interest, and you'll notice CNN hasn't yet offered "America's Governor".
We have a gold-standard of dangerous lies:
"You can keep your doctor!"
This was a bald-faced lie, issued by that lying pile of shit Obo ("Most transparent...") which, by design, managed to gain support for the worst piece of government medical interference we've yet encountered, costing the taxpayers as yet uncounted expenses.
Santos' lies, like Fauxcahantus, while despicable, are comparable to the lies told by 'young earthers' and commies: They are both stupid, but the first harms only those who buy the bullshit.
The later is hell on earth for everyone.
What we need about the lies of politicians is a bit more sense of humor.
The Santos trolling eg is now hilarious. Apparently he has been participating in drag queen contests for many years in Rio Carnival.
R's really need to make that all an important teaching moment.
What lies do we need?
All lying is COERCION, compelling others under the false authority of truth to act in the liars interest instead of their own.
We have already learned the hard way that lies need to be criminalized in court, to realize justice and in contracts to enable all trade in our economy.
Now with more communication than ever before in history, LIES are making communication little more than white noise. Nobody trusts anyone or anything.
It’s time that we must criminalize all lying in communication.
It will solve most of our problems.
"criminalize all lying in communication"
Misek hardest hit.
bit-of-a 1A matter though
As an added benefit, criminalize lying and a the lying waste of skin Kol Nidre boys and girls are going to need to find a new religion or take the advocacy for lying out of the one they currently practice.
Hahaha
Someone would have to refute anything I said first. There’s not much chance of that.
We can only hope.
Does the criminalization of perjury violate 1a?
Does the criminalization of breach of contract violate 1a?
So there is no 1a issue.
You don’t understand what the 1st amendment means.
Wrong place.
I’ve read it, as I assume you have.
Do perjury and breach of contract violate it or not?
If not why? Put your logic where your mouth is.
Misek’s “irrefutable” evidence shown to be largely lacking in evidence and refuted where we find some few scraps:
1) “There has been no objective forensic analysis at any supposed site. That means that there is no physical evidence.”
That’s a lie.
Contemporarily, there was ample evidence in carcasses, skeletons, other human remains, mounds of possessions, gold dentures, etc.
Even in 1994, comparisons cyanide ions remaining on the walls of buildings where Zyklon-B was used sparing as a fumigant and the walls of the cellars at Auschwitz shows drastic deltas: Institute for Forensic Research, Cracow: Post-Leuchter Report (archive.org)
2) “Any activity that demonstrates and shares evidence to refute the holocaust is a crime in every nation where it allegedly occurred”
Irrelevance
3) “The crucial event of the story is the cyanide gassing of millions of Jews. That never happened.”
Lie or possible attempt at sophistry; cyanide is the active ingredient in Zyklon-B.
4) “Jews have published books illustrated with pictures of themselves shirtless dragging piles of gassed bodies from the chambers to cremation ovens.
But cyanide is absorbed through the skin and NOBODY could have survived a single day of such activity much less collecting reparations into their old age reminiscing about it years later.”
Bullshit. It is possible to die from contact, but the primary cause of death from Zyklon-B is ingestion of the gas containing the cyanide.
5) “And so it goes with every bullshit story. The facts prove otherwise.”
Irrelevant attempt to poison the well; not evidence.
6) “Let’s not forget another old timey favourite.The story of Babi Yar is a popular lesson in Jewish schools described as the single largest event of the holocaust.
The lesson is that between 30,000 and 100,000 Jews were taken to a ravine in Ukraine where they were killed.
The story is told by one Jewish survivor, Dina Pronicheva, an actress who testified that she was forced to strip naked and marched to the edge of the ravine. When the firing squad shot, she jumped into the ravine and played dead. After being covered by thousands of bodies and tons of earth she dug herself out, unscathed, when the coast was clear and escaped to tell the story.
She is apparently the only person in history to successfully perform a matrix bullet dodge at a firing squad. The soldier aiming point blank at her never noticed her escape. Never walked a few steps to the edge of the ravine to finish her off.
They were stripped naked to leave no evidence. Naked she had no tools to dig herself out from under 30,000 bodies and tons of dirt.
Only after the deed was done, the nazis realized that so many bullet ridden bodies were evidence. Oops, rookie move. So they brought more Jews and millions of cubic feet of firewood to dig them up, cremate them on gravestones and scatter their ashes in surrounding fields.
There has been no forensic investigation at the site. None of the bullets allegedly burned with the bodies have been recovered. Not one shred of physical evidence of this has ever been found.
There are military aerial photographs of the area at the time but they don’t show any evidence of the narrative, no people, no equipment, no firewood, no moved earth, no tracks of any kind.
Simply stating these facts is a crime in Ukraine where the Babi Yar narrative is taught in school”
To be honest, I haven’t heard of this but as regards any of evidence with reference to the Holocaust, it says nothing at all. It is totally irrelevant.
7) “Have you ever heard of the Bletchley park decrypts of the famous German enigma machines? It was credited for turning the tide of the war as allies knew what military actions the Germans were planning.
Only released in the 1980s those translated messages included prison camp information, deaths, transfers and requests for medicines to treat illnesses. The numbers of dead don’t support the holocaust narrative of which there was also no mention of”
Cite missing for YOUR claim, but:
“Allied forces knew about Holocaust two years before discovery of concentration camps, secret documents reveal”
[…]
“The Allied Powers were aware of the scale of the Jewish Holocaust two-and-a-half years earlier than is generally assumed, and had even prepared war crimes indictments against Adolf Hitler and his top Nazi commanders…”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/world-history/holocaust-allied-forces-knew-before-concentration-camp-discovery-us-uk-soviets-secret-documents-a7688036.html
8) “Are you willingly performing the feeble mental gymnastics required to believe, as the story goes, that Germans were communicating in code about prison camps while talking plainly about their military actions with their top secret enigma machines?”
OK, this goes beyond parody, and this represents the Nazi shit’s level of gullibility.
Simply, yes, the Nazis did NOT want to broadcast to the world that they were engaged in mass-murder, as the post-war interrogations proved. If there’s ‘mental gymnastics’ here, Nazi shit just got a unanimous “1”.
9) “The numbers of dead from German enigma decrypts does align with Red Cross numbers”
Cite missing.
“The Red Cross regularly visited all prison camps. It was their job to report the cause of all deaths. They recorded a grand total of 271,000 among all camps for the entire war. It is a matter of record.
Are you performing the feeble mental gymnastics required to believe that the Red Cross were so incompetent that they were completely unaware of 95% or 5,629,000 deaths?”
Is Nazi shit so gullible as to believe the Nazis would welcome the Red Cross to the death camps? Seems so. Value as “evidence” = zero
10) “Zyklon B is an off the shelf insecticide used among other places in Prison camps to delouse clothing and bedding to save lives by preventing deadly typhus. The system used for years before the war employed heating to release cyanide gas, fans to circulate the gas and more to exhaust the chambers to make the de loused articles safe to handle.
Pictures of this equipment and the small de lousing buildings with clothing racks still exist in Prison camps. But no evidence of any gas delivery system has ever been found in the shower houses where the bullshit holocaust allegedly occurred. In fact, the story has changed to that they just threw the heat activated pellets onto the cold drainless floors in rooms full of people.
Such an inefficient method would have taken too long to kill the required number of Jews. The pellets couldn’t be spread evenly in rooms full of people. The cold drainless floors would have delayed the release of cyanide from the pellets that people would have swept away from themselves. Any dead would have released all their bodily fluids and their bodies covering the pellets. Vomit would have been added to the floor prior to entering such a room.”
Arm-waving; see about for Zyklon-B concentrations. Value as “evidence” = zero
11) “According to Martin Gilbert in his book, Holocaust Journey, the gas chambers at Treblinka utilized carbon monoxide from diesel engines. At the Nuremberg trial of the Nazi war criminals, the American government charged that the Jews were murdered at Treblinka in “steam chambers,” not gas chambers.”
Arm-waving, Value as “evidence” = zero
12) “Gasoline engine exhaust contains about ten times the carbon monoxide than diesel. Diesel exhaust is relatively safe. Even if the Diesel engines were running at their maximum of 500 ppm, death would take several hours. Far too long to support the narrative.”
One approximation, one number many assumptions, no support. Value as “evidence” = zero.
13) “If Germans had used gas engines, death would have been in a few minutes. But in the holocaust narrative for treblinka diesel was used even though they had plenty of gas for their tanks. Nuremberg still recorded that they were “steam chambers”.
Which stupid lie is more believable? You have to perform some feeble mental gymnastics to buy that.”
More arm-waving, weak attempt at well poisoning, zero evidence.
14) “Jews had been publicly claiming a holocaust of 6 million Jews in various nations no less than 166 times between 1900 and 1945. Only to coerce sympathy to raise money. Like the wastes of skin who fake cancer on go fund me pages.
The story of gassing Jews began as British propaganda to turn popular opinion against Germany. It was inspired to draw attention away from Jewish Bolshevik war crimes in Russia because that would work against allied propaganda. It also served global Jewish interests to create undeserved sympathy for Jews who had publicly organized boycotts of Germany to drive Germany to war.”
Anti-sematic rant, followed by idiotic conspiracy theory; not anywhere close to “evidence”.
15) “There is a documented letter from the head of British propaganda to the head of the war office recommending that they cease the “gassing Jews“ propaganda because there was no evidence for it and if found out would work against their propaganda efforts.”
I’ll bet there were all sorts of letters which were embarrassing during WWII. Try finding some evidence
16) “The only thing the bullshit holocaust narrative has in common with WW2 is that they were both the creation of Jews.
These Jewish leaders are admitting it. Are they lying?
“We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany”.
David A Brown, national chairman, united Jewish campaign, 1934.
“The Israeli people around the world declare economic and financial war against Germany …holy war against Hitlers people”
Chaim Weismann, the Zionist leader, 8 September 1939, Jewish chronicle.
The Toronto evening telegram of 26 February 1940 quoted rabbi Maurice l. Perlzweig of the world Jewish Congress as telling a Canadian audience that” The world Jewish Congress has been at war with Germany for seven years”.
Smells strongly of “DID YOU HEAR WHAT TRUMP SAID!!!!!”, but regardless, even if true, it is irrelevant to the question.
Nazi scum, a low-watt bulb, incapable of understanding the basic concepts "evidence" and "relevance" of responds with further arm-waving and bullshit, claims the above is only a flesh wound: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UijhbHvxWrA
Stick your head in a gas oven and die, Nazi shit.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,200 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.SmartJob1.Com
This feeble minded person doesn’t understand that a failed attempt to refute something, doesn’t refute anything.
This is the SIXTH time it has re-pasted its pathetic failure. It doesn’t have the intelligence for shame.
Here is how I’ve refuted its feeble failure point by point.
1) “ Even in 1994, comparisons cyanide ions remaining on the walls of buildings where Zyklon-B was used sparing as a fumigant and the walls of the cellars at Auschwitz shows drastic deltas:”
Do you realize that your quote is refuting the holocaust?
Are you saying that the lecter report was objective forensic analysis? Because it concluded that the holocaust couldn’t have occurred as told. It was written in the US where the holocaust is not alleged to have occurred and it is not a crime to deny it.
The “polish rebuttal” was never peer reviewed and was conducted in and by a nation in which concluding the holocaust never occurred is a crime punishable with imprisonment. Does that sound “objective” even to you?
A summary of this topic, for the brainwashed, is that the iron in zyklon b reacted with the brick turning it blue in the clothing fumigation but not the alleged homicidal gas chambers. That is a fact.
Leuchters report in the US was not allowed in the second trial of Ernst Zündel because the court ruled that it wasn’t forensic. Both trials in Canada in the 1980’s though initially convictions were subsequently overturned. He was eventually deported to Germany where merely denying the holocaust is a crime, and convicted of that.
The polish report simply found trace elements of cyanide in the bricks at the alleged homicidal chambers as would be found in all buildings in any camp using zyklon b for delousing. It never compared the amount differences ignoring the blue fumigation versus gray homicidal bricks as the direct result of repeated exposure to zyklon b in one versus the other.
There has been no objective peer reviewed forensic analysis conducted to resolve this issue because in Poland where the evidence exists, it is still illegal to do so.
What government will allow a government approved report to break a government approved law?
Your vague point (1) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 2)…
2) “irrelevance”
The fact that all evidence that refutes the holocaust is criminal in every nation where it allegedly occurred is relevant if you are accepting any evidence at all from those nations.
Refusing to consider evidence is the definition of bias and your conclusion that bias is irrelevant only demonstrates your disregard for justice and your bigotry.
Your statement (2) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 3)…
3) “ Lie or possible attempt at sophistry; cyanide is the active ingredient in Zyklon-B.”
Zyklon b was used all over Europe for decades before and during WW2 to kill lice that carried typhus. It is not evidence of a holocaust.
You haven’t refuted anything.
Your point (3) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 4)
4) “It is possible to die from contact, but the primary cause of death from Zyklon-B is ingestion of the gas containing the cyanide.”
According to the testimony of the so called survivor, the timing entering the chambers immediately, the details shirtless survivor, piles of bodies with unvented cyanide gas pockets in every space, death from repeated exposure as per testimony would have been necessary, not just possible.
Why don’t you try it?
Your claim (4) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 5)…
5)” Irrelevant attempt to poison the well; not evidence.”
It’s not irrelevant when the facts I’ve presented are irrefutable. It describes what you are currently trying to refute and are failing miserably at.
Your statement (5) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 6)…
6)” To be honest, I haven’t head of this but as regards its evidence regarding the Holocaust, it says nothing at all; it is totally irrelevant.”
If you haven’t heard of it how the fuck can you refute it? Just because you’re ignorant of it, doesn’t make something irrelevant.
We’re starting to see your pattern here.
Your statement (6) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 7)…
7)” Cite missing for YOUR claim, but:
“Allied forces knew about Holocaust two years before discovery of concentration camps, secret documents reveal”
[…]
“The Allied Powers were aware of the scale of the Jewish Holocaust two-and-a-half years earlier than is generally assumed, and had even prepared war crimes indictments against Adolf Hitler and his top Nazi commanders…”
w.independent.co.uk/news/world/world-history/holocaust-allied-forces-knew-before-concentration-camp-discovery-us-uk-soviets-secret-documents-a7688036.html”
Read your own link fuckwit.
It admits that “the world was learning about the holocaust” in 1941 as the result of allied propaganda.
I provided this cite to you years ago and you still haven’t refuted it.
Here it is again dummy.
“Looks like partial cremation retard sevo doesn’t want to try to refute the proof of lying shlomo.
Time to rub your nose in your amateur attempt to refute the proof that Germans were concerned about the lives of the prisoners in Aushwitz.
Here are some actual enigma decrypts from Bletchley park in 1942 when deaths were at their highest.
The link is to many more that share all kinds of Aushwitz details, absolutely no hint of any “extermination plan”.
Firstly the number of dead for the month are nowhere near what is necessary to support the holocaust narrative.
Secondly, notable is the concern over typhus deaths and the requests for medical supplies to treat.
Here
GPDD No’s.:- 194/199, 201/203, 205, 218, 219, 222/3, 226,
233, 236, 239, 240/2, 247.
================================================================
Covering the period 3rd Aug. 1942 – 25th Sept. 1942
A
further examination is made of Concentration Camp figures;
deaths from typhus have reached a very high figure in
AUSCHWITZ.
A suspected case of typhus is reported from
AUSCHWITZ (223b/42). It is probable that on the 6th August
Nachschubkdtr. Russland Mitte requests typhus vaccine for
50 men and spottenfever serum for 20
For the first time returns are given for deaths of
prisoners (223b/14,24,43,50): the figures for August are:
NIEDERHAGEN 21, AUSCHWITZ 6829 (or 6889) men, 1525 women;.
w.whatreallyhappened.info/decrypts/hw16_65_zip_os2_27.9.42.html
Your point (7) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 8)…
8) “OK, this goes beyond parody, and this represents the Nazi shit’s level of gullibility.
Simply, yes, the Nazis did NOT want to broadcast to the world that they were engaged in mass-murder, as the post-war interrogations proved. If there’s ‘mental gymnastics’ here, Nazi shit just got a unanimous “1”.”
Yeah thanks for admitting that you think that Germany intentionally lost WW2 to cover up the holocaust. Just go with that next time. Hahaha
Nothing to refute here folks. That was easy. Moving on to 9)…
9)a)”Cite missing.”
Cite provided above. That was easy. Moving on to 9)b)…
9)b)”Is Nazi shit so gullible as to believe the Nazis would welcome the Red Cross to the death camps? Seems so. Value as “evidence” = zero”
The Red Criss kept records of their visits to all prison camps. Including Aushwitz.
Here is a summary of all recorded deaths. My point remains.
From: International
Red Cross, Arolsen
West Germany
w.renegadetribune.com/international-red-cross-report-confirms-holocaust-six-million-jews-hoax/
Your point (9) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 10)…
10)”Arm-waving; see about for Zyklon-B concentrations. Value as “evidence” = zero”
You have not attempted to refute my statement.
Your rhetoric (10) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 11)…
11)”Arm-waving, Value as “evidence” = zero”
It clearly demonstrates that the liars who concocted and told the holocaust story can’t get their lies straight. It is irrefutable evidence of Contradiction = lie.
Now you’re just being lazy.
Your feeble attempt 11) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 12)…
12)”One approximation, one number many assumptions, no support. Value as “evidence” = zero.”
One more fact that you haven’t refuted.
We all can see that you’re not even trying to refute what you deny.
Your pathetic attempt 12) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 13)…
13)”More arm-waving, weak attempt at well poisoning, zero evidence.”
More logic that you can’t/won’t refute.
Your pathetic attempt 13) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 14)…
14)”Anti-sematic rant, followed by idiotic conspiracy theory; not anywhere close to “evidence”.”
It’s a fact that demonstrates that Jews have a long history of falsely claiming holocausts and logically questions the statistical likelihood that this time after 166 lies that actually 6 million Jews did die.
That’s relevant.
Your pathetic attempt 14) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 15)…
15)”I’ll bet there were all sorts of letters which were embarrassing during WWII. Try finding some evidence”
Again, you aren’t refuting my statement. People have found the evidence. I’m sharing it. You’re denying but not refuting it.
Cite provided again.
Head of British Psychological Warfare Executive (Propaganda), Victor Cavendish-Bentick in a handwritten note, wrote on Aug 27th, 1943,
“We have had a good run for our money with this gas chamber story we have been putting about, but don’t we run the risk eventually we are going to be found out and when we are found out the collapse of that lie is going to bring the whole of our psychological warfare down with it? So isn’t it rather time now to let it drift off by itself and concentrate on other lines that we are running.”
Public Record Office Document F0371/34551 revealed by Stephen Mitford Goodson, ‘Inside the South African Reserve Bank’.
Your vague doubt (15) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to 16)…
16)”Smells strongly of “DID YOU HEAR WHAT TRUMP SAID!!!!!”, but regardless, even if true, it is irrelevant to the question.”
They are properly referenced quotes from Jewish leaders demonstrating that they had intended to create and force Germany into WW2.
That kind of evil is absolutely relevant when considering the character required to lie to the world about a holocaust for the 167 th time.
Yeah, it stinks. But it’s coming from you.
Your pathetic attempt 16) has been refuted. That was easy. Moving on to… that’s it you’re done.
I’ve demonstrated that you haven’t refuted any of my points.
I like feeding the irrefutable evidence of truth to bigots like you and laughing every time you choke.
Yes, I’m weeping. I haven’t laughed so hard in a long time. Hahaha.
You are a sick person.
"I’ve demonstrated that you haven’t refuted any of my points."
No, you've again demonstrated your lack of ability to understand basic concepts.
Those are tears of rage in your eyes, not laughter, you lying fuck. Sevo handed your ass to you and you had nothing but lies to come back with.
"Stupid" is both necessary and sufficient.
THX.
It's probably not a good idea to debate an ignoramus entirely too fucking stupid to understand that a random Jew caught lying during WWII has no relevance to his claims re: the holocaust, but the Nazi shit once accused me of not refuting his bullshit, and anyone capable of critical thought can easily see Misek has been called on what he imagines to be "evidence" (another concept which is beyond his ken).
He's gonna get it jammed in his face every time he lies about it; the scumbag deserves nothing other.
“Do perjury and breach of contract violate it or not?”
You stupid shit, A1 does not protect lies which directly harm others, and “perjury” is irrelevant (a concept which you should study, given it’s a mystery to you) unless it does so. Simply, A1 in no way protects anyone lying to cause harm.
The application is analogous (you may have to look that up also, shitbag) to the rule that the truth is absolute defense to any claim of liable.
Your inability to examine any concept beyond some sort of one-dimensional “thinking” is noted, but not often as clearly as here. Fuck off and die, Nazi shit.
Let me add: There is no intent on my part to influence Reason to edit the Nazi shit's response. Absolutely none.
If anyone reading his risible reply to being refuted is swayed, well, there is little hope.
Keep posting your bullshit reply, Nazi shit! It will only add to those who recognize you as an ignoramus and a Nazi shit!
Hahaha.
You have never refuted my point by point refutation of your failed attempt.
You tried to refute me once and failed miserably. I encourage you to re-post your failed attempt often.
Not only does it demonstrate how feeble minded you are but also and more importantly the fact that nobody else is willing to argue your failed attempt for you. Your argument is a shit baton in a fuckwit relay race, just lying on the ground for everyone to see and laugh at.
And it affords me the opportunity to post more irrefutable evidence exposing the holocaust lie and it’s Jewish / government conspirators.
I’m pleased with these optics. Hahaha.
Like this.
The Red Cross was founded in 1863 with the purpose of protecting the interests of victims of conflicts.
The holocaust fairytale requires us to believe that they were so unaware of what might happen that they completely missed 95% of the victims in prison camps.
AND that they had not so much as an inkling that a holocaust was going on right under their noses. Because there is no evidence of any Red Cross document suggesting they did.
271000 total deaths recorded by the Red Cross of people of all religions in prison camps during an entire world war and typhus epidemic is not the six million Jews falsely claimed 166 times between the years 1900 and 1945.
The Red Cross made their “apology” for missing 529 million deaths and the holocaust entirely in 2005 under pressure from the holocaust fairytale purveyors on the 60th anniversary of their often repeated lie.
NOTHING from the Red Cross before then. Even though allied psy ops, propaganda office had broadcast the story of gassing jews throughout the war, the Red Cross never mentioned anything that would lead to an inkling of a holocaust in ANY report. Even though thousands of Jewish fuckwitnesses “survived the holocaust” nobody ever mentioned anything to the Red Cross who visited all camps regularly.
It was EXACTLY what the Red Cross was tasked to look for but they were completely oblivious to 95% of prison camp deaths even after being warned about it by the propaganda offices.
Then 60 years later during the cherished bogeyman celebrations they apologized for it. No explanation of how they could have completely failed their mandate. NO FORENSIC ANALYSIS of what they did wrong was ever done or even requested.
Because forensic analysis is the LAST THING purveyors of the holocaust fairytale want. They’ve made it illegal to do in EVERY nation where the tale allegedly occurred.
The empty apology from the Red Cross after 60 years of silence defies logic and isn’t worth the paper it was written on.
http://www.renegadetribune.com/international-red-cross-report-confirms-holocaust-six-million-jews-hoax/
Hahaha
“A1 does not protect lies“
All lying causes harm by coercing people and robbing them of their agency.
So you’re saying that criminalizing lying isn’t “a 1a matter.”
You have a fuckwit way of agreeing with me. Hahaha.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM