Institute for Justice Petitions Supreme Court to Take Case Seeking to Overrule Kelo v. City of New London
Kelo is the 2005 ruling in which the Supreme Court held that the government can take property for private "economic development.""
Kelo is the 2005 ruling in which the Supreme Court held that the government can take property for private "economic development.""
To the bewilderment of many, North Carolina's hurricane relief bill includes the nation's strongest property rights protections against new zoning restrictions.
What is paid out to Social Security beneficiaries is not a return on workers' investments. It's just a government expenditure, like any other.
Internal tensions within the movement are real, but far from irreconcilable. Litigation and political reform are mutually reinforcing, not mutually exclusive pathways to curbing exclusionary zoning.
A new paper by housing expert Salim Furth shows it does so by making it harder for marginal people to find housing with relatives and friends.
Mandates, school closures, and overreach defined an administration that doubled down on failed policies.
The Pilgrims learned this lesson the hard way. Fast forward 400 years, and many Americans have forgotten.
Justice Gorsuch shows more interest in property rights challenges than his colleagues on the Court.
Victory in the fight for cheaper housing, a more liberal land-use regime, and greater property rights won't come from the White House.
In this Texas Law Review article, Josh Braver and I argue that most exclusionary zoning violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Inhumane labor practices, worker deaths, and the forced eviction and repression of local residents have characterized the kingdom's efforts to build a miles-long linear skyscraper in the desert.
Federal agents are allowed to search private property without a warrant under this Prohibition-era Supreme Court precedent.
While I am eager for the Court to take another public use case, I am actually happy the justices chose to reject this one. Its unusual facts made it a poor vehicle for revisiting Kelo v. City of New London.
Home equity theft happens when governments auction off seized houses and keep the profits—even once the tax bill is paid.
Urban renewal efforts should recognize that existing businesses and new residents can coexist.
For more than three decades, the Institute for Justice has shown that economic freedom and private property are essential safeguards for ordinary Americans.
Mellor was cofounder and longtime president of the Institute for Justice, one of the nation's leading public-interest law firms.
As hurricane damage mounts, the government is buying—and sometimes seizing—homes in flood-prone areas, sparking concerns over property rights and accusations of discrimination.
Plus: Massachusetts NIMBYs get their day in court, Pittsburgh one-step forward, two-steps back approach to zoning reform, and a surprisingly housing-heavy VP debate.
Progressives are trying to fix the errors of the past, but they're ignoring the best solution: More robust property rights.
A handful of states use loopholes to get around a Supreme Court ruling that declared the practice unconstitutional.
The ruling highlights need for state-level zoning reform and stronger judicial protection of constitutional property rights.
Revised versions of both publications are now up on SSRN.
Two brothers are asking the Supreme Court to stop their town from using eminent domain to steal their land for an empty field.
The property has remained empty for almost twenty years, after the Supreme Court's controversial ruling upholding its condemnation to promote "economic development."
Plus, a look at Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Tina Smith's plan to resurrect public housing in America.
It provides an overview of several major issues in land-use policy.
The outrageous seizure at the center of Rebel Ridge resembles real-life cash grabs.
A Swiss publication invited me to write this article making the case for open borders.
Bobby Debelak, new host of this podcast, interviewed me about a variety of topics related to eminent domain and property rights.
t makes case that enormous benefits of organ markets create a strong presumption in favor of legalization that standard objections don't even come close to overcoming.
The city of Seaside, California, ordered a man to cover the boat parked in his driveway. He offered a lesson in malicious compliance.
Harvard economist Edward Glaeser, a leading expert on housing policy, offers some ideas on how Congress can use conditional spending to break down barriers to housing construction.
Kevin Fair fell behind on his property taxes in 2014. The local government eventually gave a private investor the deed to his home.
Economist Tyler Cowen argues the answer is "yes." But much depends on what kind of mobility we're talking about.
The Edmondson Community Organization accrued a modest property tax debt. The group paid dearly for that.
With minor exceptions, their proposals are likely to do more harm than good.
After a Michigan couple indicated their intent to open a green cemetery, their local township passed an ordinance to forbid it. A judge found the rule unconstitutional.
The 2-1 decision overrules a trial court decision that went the other way, and could set an important property rights precedent.
The report has useful data on the scope of the problem, and recommendations on what can be done about it.
If you want "local control" of land use, the best way to do it is let property owners decide how to use their property for themselves.
With prices skyrocketing, the city is weighing whether to regulate hotels further by barring them from hiring contracted workers.
Chelsea Koetter is asking the Michigan Supreme Court to render the state's debt collection scheme unconstitutional.
Recent footage shows a federal agent attempting to search a citizen’s bag without their consent, despite precedent saying that’s illegal.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10