The Case for Creating "Constitutional Small Claims Courts"
Clark Neily's excellent proposal for addressing small, but troubling politice violations of constitutional rights.
Clark Neily's excellent proposal for addressing small, but troubling politice violations of constitutional rights.
Such scientific ignorance is common in th US as well, and can have a harmful influence on government policy.
DOJ argued that the impeachment vote may affect the resolution of the subpoena issued to Don McGahn
Just in case you had any doubts about that.
Now that's being tough on crime.
Census undercounts, jury nullification, and a judicial change of heart.
The school policy allows girls to wear small earrings, but doesn't allow them for boys.
A simple communication could resolve any doubts about the status of the President's impeachment
More on Doe v. Mckesson, the Baton Rouge Black Lives Matter case.
Only the House can define when the President has been impeached but the Senate could deem the President is acquitted due to lack of prosecution
There is no reason for a judicial decision to write that the ACA "was enacted as part of a fraud on the American people"
The plaintiffs' quarrel is with the statute book, not the defendants.
the Baton Rouge Black Lives Matter case (in which Judge Don Willett has just switched to dissenting, and in which a cert. petition has been filed with the U.S. Supreme Court).
The case, in which Judge Don Willett has just switched to dissenting, should be an easy win for DeRay Mckesson—but on a theory that hadn't been asserted in court.
The Fifth Circuit has operationalized Justice Thomas's Murphy concurrence
Episode 294 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
The 5th Circuit follows NFIB v. Sebelius: the ACA can no longer be read to offer a choice between buying insurance and paying a penalty.
The House may not transmit the articles of impeachment until the Senate trial's procedures are established
The appellate court remanded the most important issue in the case back to the district court. But its instructions will make it difficult for the trial judge to again rule that the entire Affordable Care Act must fall with the individual mandate.
"The evidentiary basis for this injury is even stronger than it was in NFIB."
As if there wasn't enough going on this week, a federal appellate court issues a significant (and significantly flawed) ruling in the latest Obamacare challenge
"Steve Farzam, chief operating officer of the Shore Hotel [in Santa Monica], ... [has] been charged with counterfeiting a Los Angeles County Superior Court seal."
RBG continues to exercise terrible discretion, even after apologizing to President Trump
Sorting at scale is always going to be hard.
The decision is significant in itself and has important implications for other cases where the government deliberately damages private property in the process of coping with natural disasters.
Learn cutting edge originalism from top scholars and jurists
The Volokh Conspiracy tradition of celebrating Saturnalia continues.
Influencing when a decision is issued can affect the attention it receives.
Another empirical study finds a substitution effect between vaping and smoking
Upon reconsideration, Judge Willett splits with his colleagues over whether Black Lives Matter activist can be liable for violent protests
Could the House delay voting on the Articles of Impeachment, or vote on them, but decline to transmit them to the House?