Part I: Barr v. AAPC and Judicial Departmentalism
Justice Kavanaugh recognize the difference between a judgment and precedent, but falls back to judicial universality.
Justice Kavanaugh recognize the difference between a judgment and precedent, but falls back to judicial universality.
An important point on judicial retroactivity buried in a footnote of Justice Kavanaugh's opinion in Barr v. AAPC.
In a decision considering federal limitations on robocalls, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its longstanding approach to severability.
Episode 323 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
The state of New York, the court concludes, hasn't impermissibly discriminated against such camps.
keeps in place the rest of the law banning robocalls to cell phones.
Justice Kagan articulates why most originalists favor original public meaning, over original expectations originalism.
The Court studiously avoided addressing a central element of the Electors' Argument
Douglass' classic speech is an indictment of slavery, racism, and American hypocrisy - but also includes a great deal of praise of the American Revolution.
I recapitulate why it's important that the American Revolution was not an ethno-nationalist secession movement, and address claims that history would have taken a better course had the Revolution been defeated or never happened.
Today is the anniversary of one of the most controversial - and most unpopular - property rights decisions in the history of the Supreme Court.
More lessons on writing from the masters.
Ban on most new green cards extended through the year as well
Has anyone told Twitter? It's Episode 321 of the Cyberlaw Podcast.
A traitorous and failed attempt to secede over slavery is nothing to celebrate.
From SCOTUSBlog's Interim Stat Pack
A reminder to be skeptical of all such breaking stories, whether they have to do with alleged racist hate crimes or anti-police hate crimes.
The interview was conducted by Trevor Burrus and Aaron Ross Powell of the Cato Institute.
you just know it will be decided based on threshold jurisdictional amounts. Lawyers can suck the fun out of everything.
Four cases are pending from the pre-Covid arguments, 10 cases are pending from the May siting
Justice Thomas again rejects substantive due process incorporation
whose encyclopedia entry on Fiduciary Remedies was cited twice by today's Justice Thomas dissent in Liu v. SEC!
Some lessons on writing from the masters.
He remains a tenured faculty member.
Second in a series of posts based on my new book "Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom"
The Department of Justice is finding creative ways to file federal charges against rioters and looters.
An interesting petition pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The interest in fighting age discrimination in employment doesn't trump free speech rights.
Justice Thomas's echoes Cato's brief about the Non-Delegation Doctrine, the Major Question Doctrine, an "Adverse Possession" theory of Executive Power, and the Take Care Clause.
It was hinted at in the D.C. Respondent's brief, but the Chief's "severability" analysis was a John Roberts blue plate special.
There is good reason to take down Confederate monuments. But rioting and vandalism are the wrong way to go about it.
Generally DOJ is eager to appeal anything, and everything to the Supreme Court. Not during Blue June.
"By the looks of it, the horse is not just out of the barn—it is out of the country."
The event includes questions and commentary by Northwestern University law Professor John McGinnis
Professor Christopher Walker explores a potential wrinkle in the DACA decision.
The answer may surprise you.