Obama Administration Most Transparent in History, More Than One of Three Americans Believe: Who Are These People?
37 percent
The frivolous arguments for suppressing the 911 calls placed during the Newtown massacre.
Directs everybody to public affairs office instead
But it's fine because officials were informed
Christie already knows how to act like a president
Now that it affects important people, she wants a full surveillance review
Officials did not want intercepted evidence used as evidence in trials
"A painfully slow and opaque process," you say?
All that information at his fingertips and he still has little understanding of America
In response to bad press, state passed a law concealing names of people involved
Well, this is the most transparent administration in history, right?
So much for that whole "oversight" thing
But not all judges are allowing it.
Does not consider herself to be a pacifist -- rather she wanted public to be better-informed
Clapper flip-flops, furloughs workers
The age of easy leaks is here to stay, no matter what happens to Julian Assange.
Argues they're more efforts at nudging than useful rules for corporate transparency
Border Patrol not really using them
Unclassified information frequently stamped secret
Most transparent administration yada, yada, yada
Twelve reasons not to date an NSA worker
Case that prompted DOJ to secretly collect wire service's phone records
Calls on inspector general of intel division
Closed to the public and not independent from those overseeing the programs
And then claimed members didn't want to attend
Maybe there's something to those bumper stickers about the military having to hold a bake sale
Regarding opinions on the constitutionality of Section 215 of the Patriot Act
The public says Obama disappoints on transparency and that Congress passes too many laws. It's split on Snowden, trusts Facebook less than the IRS on privacy, and opposes a bailout for Detroit.
Did murder victim actually die in mayor's arms?
A blow to the secrecy of the no-fly list
There truly aren't enough "LOL"s for that one
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks