The FDA's Deadly Censorship of Lifesaving E-Cigarette Information
Regulators won't let manufacturers of vaping hardware and e-liquids tell their customers the truth.
Regulators won't let manufacturers of vaping hardware and e-liquids tell their customers the truth.
The agency's new rules threaten products that offer a much safer alternative to smoking.
The market for cigars is about to become a lot less diverse and a lot more boring.
The agency's final rule leaves conventional cigarettes on the market while requiring much safer alternatives to meet prohibitive requirements.
E-cigarettes aren't just a safer alternative to the real thing, they're an innovation people plan to use whether or not scolds approve.
The venerable British medical society recognizes the harm-reducing potential of e-cigarettes.
The British medical group endorses e-cigarettes as a harm-reducing alternative to the conventional kind.
The senator says there's "almost the question" of why cigarettes are "a legal product in this country."
The agency bizarrely counts tobacco-free, noncombustible e-cigarettes as a kind of tobacco.
Two public health researchers condemn the "information quarantine" surrounding safer nicotine products.
Starting today, professional ballplayers at Dodger Stadium will be legally prohibited from chewing tobacco, because of hypocritical local pols who recognize no restraint on their power
Celebrity doctor Margaret Cuomo falsely claims e-cigarettes are "at least as harmful" as the real thing.
Liberty suffers another blow in Chicago 'for the children.'
Margaret Cuomo claims e-cigarettes are "at least as harmful" as the real thing.
The Big Apple becomes the latest city to embrace "over-legislating the human race" at sporting events.
Grown man in uniform makes considerably more sense than Chicago politicians
The old rule notionally exposed Americans to criminal penalties for buying and consuming Cuban cigars while abroad.
Cannabis consumption is up since the early 1990s but still substantially lower than in the '70s.
The same survey finds that never-smokers rarely become regular vapers.
The problem is too much FDA regulation, not too little.
E-cigarette critics lean heavily on post hoc, ergo propter hoc reasoning.
A chemical comparison shows e-cigarettes are far less hazardous than tobacco cigarettes.
Is vaping less dangerous than smoking? The Inquistr is determined not to tell you.
Tom Frieden should listen to what English public health officials say about e-cigarettes.
English public health officials, unlike ours, recognize the harm-reducing potential of vaping.
A new government report endorses vaping as a harm-reducing alternative to smoking.
Fears that e-cigarettes lure nonsmokers into nicotine habits seem to be unfounded.
The CDC misleads the public about the hazards of vaping.
The paper worries about "harms and risks" that are "potentially dangerous."
The agency falsely equates vaping devices with tobacco products.
Where is this "gateway effect" we keep hearing about?
Levels are about the same as those found in air.
Good-for-nothing teenagers gotta smoke something.
Tobacco used to be the weed that made you stupid and lazy.
The state's Department of Public Health sees no upside to a product that can save smokers' lives.
By opposing e-cigarettes, anti-tobacco activists are very likely killing people
Researchers use an unrealistic test to imply that vaping causes cancer.
Don't stop hoarding those Cuban cigars just yet.
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.