Should Consumers Expect to Find Bones in "Boneless Wings"?
"Boneless wings" aren't wings, so does that mean they don't have to be boneless either? The Ohio Supreme Court weighs in.
"Boneless wings" aren't wings, so does that mean they don't have to be boneless either? The Ohio Supreme Court weighs in.
The close 4-3 decision might well become a staple of textbooks.
The decision exemplifies a longstanding issue in legal theory. It also highlights the absurdity of zoning rules.
An interesting amicus brief urges the justices not to rely upon penumbras and emanations in construing the scope of Presidential immunity.
Further debate on textualism, "common good constitutionalism," and the classical legal method.
Survey data casts doubt on the textualist rationale for the major questions doctrine that I and others have advanced. But perhaps not as much doubt as it might seem.
Judge Rao's 2022 Canary lecture has now been published in the Case Western Reserve Law Review.
In today's student loan decision, Justice Barrett offers a textualist rationale for this controversial rule. I have made similar arguments myself.
Legal scholar Ilan Wurman argues the controversial doctrine is justifiable on textualist and linguistic grounds.
Critics claim the doctrine is obviously at odds with textualism. But that isn't the case.
The link between Bostock v. Clayton County and Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina
Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch are disagreeing more than you might think, but Justice Barrett appears to have the upper hand.
A lecture on textualism at the Case Western Reserve University School of Law.