Supreme Court to Take on Case of Generic Drug Timing
Drug makers pay to keep generic pills off the market
Drug makers pay to keep generic pills off the market
How opening up marriage regulations will help make the case for eliminating them
Both California and federal laws under review
A finer-tuned legal argument might have been wise
It does amount to a temporary taking of the property, the high court rules
Still a slim chance for news on Monday
Proposition 8 defines marriage as between a man and a woman
More cases are reaching the high court
The ruling in Kirtsaeng v. Wiley & Sons just may do that.
California's Proposition 8 and the federal Defense of Marriage Act both under review
A New Deal price-fixing scheme reaches the High Court. Will the justices take the case?
The White House did not object as the Supreme Court ordered an appeals court to consider the challenge
At issue is how farmers may launch challenge
Hailed by liberal press as "Brave Thinker" and "American of the Year."
Last week the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case of Shelby County v. Holder. At issue is Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, a provision requiring certain states and localities to receive approval from either the Justice Department or the federal judiciary before changing their election procedures.
Decision protects bad federal behavior as long as they have probable cause to try a case
Controversy over whether defendants who are acquitted can recover fees from the Justice Department
At Greenwire, Lawrence Hurley reports on a very interesting development at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Can police take samples of anybody arrested for a crime?
Justices have already voiced skepticism over its more control-y elements
A cop with an accommodating canine can search whatever he wants.
Is probable cause required to bring them onto private property?
Those mutts really like the smell of snacks
Tomorrow the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear two Florida cases that cast doubt on the routine use of drug-sniffing dogs to generate probable cause for searches.
A federal price-fixing case highlights the judiciary's troubling deference to government regulation.
Wants to use a recent Appeals Court ruling
The winner in November may name one or more new justices. Shouldn't the voters get to hear more about it?
May have misled officials over tax-exempt status
Agreed to review the case two and a half hours before the scheduled execution
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks