Partially Informed Juries Convict the Innocent
A Supreme Court case shows how prosecutors get away with hiding evidence that could help defendants.
A Supreme Court case shows how prosecutors get away with hiding evidence that could help defendants.
The Attorney General aims to dragoon state and local officials and leave them "no real option but to acquiesce."
Understanding the SCOTUS nominee's answers to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Today's religious freedom controversies got their start in the 19th century debate over outlawing polygamy.
The president dismisses his SCOTUS nominee's objections.
Does conviction for a crime mean a permanent ban?
Matt Welch and Thomas Massie among those on tonight's Kennedy
The SCOTUS nominee talks unenumerated rights.
He should explain his views on federalism, executive power, and unenumerated rights.
He should explain his views on federalism, executive power, and unenumerated rights.
What's happening on day two of Neil Gorsuch's SCOTUS confirmation hearings.
Today the Senate Judiciary Committee begins confirmation hearings on the nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Monday in Murr v. Wisconsin, which tests the rules for when governments must pay compensation for regulatory takings.
What the Senate Judiciary Committee should ask the Supreme Court candidate.
GMU law scholar David Bernstein on how liberal and conservative judges can find common ground by embracing the right to pursue work.
Bassist Simon Tam talks about his band's Supreme Court fight to trademark its controversial name.
SCOTUS unanimously upheld the ministerial exception five years ago. It's already being challenged again.
Courts assume a "frightening and high risk of recidivism," based on an unsupported claim in Psychology Today.
Can U.S. courts compel non-citizens to pay restitution to other non-citizens for crimes that took place abroad? Apparently so.
Removal of Obama Administration's orders erases question about whether the courts should defer.
Justice Thomas says SCOTUS should review the constitutionality of asset forfeiture in a future case.
Revisiting a landmark First Amendment case.
After change in administration guidance, several drop legal challenges.
A dispute over 2.5 acres of land in the Wisconsin woods has morphed into a major property rights case. Several other states are watching it closely.
The Supreme Court is set to rule on the case.
"This has become a crucially important channel of political communication," Justice Elena Kagan observes.
Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson urges judicial minimalism in Second Amendment case.
Michigan lawmakers and the Twenty-First Amendment stink.
Trump to withdraw Obama administration's guidance, but that doesn't actually stop case moving forward.
The Trump administration has two openings to fill on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.
Sorting through Neil Gorsuch, the travel ban cases and more, with Reason's resident court watcher
Trump's SCOTUS nominee is a natural law thinker. That's a good thing.
Trump SCOTUS nominee rejects Trump's attack on the courts.
Unlike the president, Neil Gorsuch understands the role of an independent judiciary.
Is Trump's executive order banning travel from seven majority-Muslim countries subject to judicial review?
The SCOTUS nominee plumbs the peculiarities of prohibition in cases involving imitation pot and medical marijuana.
An issue the Supreme Court candidate should address.
Trump attacks "so-called judge" who issued nationwide temporary restraining order against travel ban.
It's Trump vs. Scalia when cities offer sanctuary to immigrants.
Also on the Fox Business Network program at 8 p.m. ET is John Stossel on Berkeley violence, and New Order bassist Peter Hook
Trump's Supreme Court pick isn't a fan of stupid teen arrests.
The SCOTUS nominee is not afraid to challenge the government when it exceeds the law.
Libertarian legal giant Randy Barnett says Trump's first Supreme Court nominee is a serious, smart guy. But will he restrain government?
Civil libertarians have reasons to be pleased with Trump's SCOTUS pick.
Neal Katyal says a ruling cited by the SCOTUS nominee's opponents shows why liberals should support him.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks