Why Trump's China Tariffs Won't Work
Plus: A listener asks whether or not Thomas Jefferson was right.
Plus: A listener asks whether or not Thomas Jefferson was right.
That's the highest total outside of the COVID-19 pandemic, and now Congress wants to borrow even more.
The government currently collects revenue in an arbitrary and distortionary manner, with loopholes that benefit special groups.
The Nobel Prize-winning economist says the Iron Triangle of Politics must be defeated to cut down the government for good.
Despite efforts to rein in government debt, gold prices keep rising—suggesting investors aren’t buying the promises of fiscal responsibility.
Republican members of Congress are lobbying to keep the Inflation Reduction Act's tax credits alive.
The past three administrations have tried and failed to implement binding regulations on risky research that likely caused the COVID-19 pandemic.
Farmers will bear the brunt of Trump's trade war. That's a good reason to avoid tariffs in the first place, not an excuse for another bailout.
The Federal Acquisition Regulation requires the right for the government to terminate any federal contract "for convenience."
The Senate minority leader mocked anti-tax, anti-government views held by most Americans.
More education dollars are funding more bureaucrats, who, by and large, are not improving student outcomes.
The U.S., in turn, should cancel the F-35 program altogether.
Dissidents resisting authoritarian regimes should be independent of the United States—and so should their media sources.
Musk's fans and critics will keep debating whether DOGE is revolutionizing government or wrecking important institutions.
Plus: Rate reductions, Apple encryption, the Mahmoud Khalil case, and more...
North Carolina and Virginia have managed to keep quality up and costs down.
The cost-cutting initiative's calculation of "estimated savings" is mostly mysterious, and the parts we know about are riddled with errors.
Since Congress began requiring annual audits in 2018, the Department of Defense has never passed.
The outgoing administration shoveled out loans for projects that private lenders wouldn't fund.
Every cut helps, but that's not where the money is.
The U.S. can defend itself at a lot less expense.
Threats to impeach federal judges who rule against the government are a naked attack on their constitutionally crucial function.
Reform could replace an unsustainable boondoggle with lower costs, more freedom, and better care.
Entitlements are a much bigger expense, but that doesn't mean the waste doesn't matter.
The president's assertion is divorced from reality, and so are the "estimated savings" touted by Elon Musk.
It's great to have presidents talking about the need for a balanced budget, but Republicans are backing a plan that will increase borrowing.
Handouts to corporations distort the market, breed corruption, and politicize the economy.
If only they were as big as the list of new spending.
A smaller government with a more powerful set of unaccountable executive officials is unlikely to be much of a win for liberty.
The federal government has no business being a bank.
Means-test Social Security, raise the retirement age, and let us invest our own money.
If the Department of Government Efficiency goes about this the wrong way, we could be left with both a presidency on steroids and no meaningful reduction in government.
At the current rate of inflation, the dollar will lose 33 cents of purchasing power within a decade.
Cuts to government spending mean fewer bonds, lower borrowing costs, and potentially a break for borrowers.
The presidential adviser's lack of formal authority complicates his cost-cutting mission.
"If the Republican budget passes, the deficit gets worse, not better," says Rep. Thomas Massie. He's right.
DOGE may not just save money; it may encourage honesty.
The president is positioning himself to have much greater control over a smaller, enfeebled federal bureaucracy.
The penny is expensive to produce and has long outlived its usefulness.
Democrats seem willing to tolerate a lot to get a larger government, but Republicans aren’t much better.
If Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is serious about reducing military spending, he will need to embrace a narrower understanding of national security.
It tries to offset as much as $4.8 trillion—mostly for tax cut extensions—with only $1.5 trillion in supposed spending reductions.
"The only way you get less waste is to give them less money to spend," says the libertarian-adjacent senator from Kentucky.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks