How Donald Trump and Elon Musk Could Cut $2 Trillion in Government Spending
If Musk is truly serious about fiscal discipline, he'll advise the president-elect to eschew many of the policies he promised on the campaign trail.
If Musk is truly serious about fiscal discipline, he'll advise the president-elect to eschew many of the policies he promised on the campaign trail.
The bipartisan embrace of industrial policy represents one of the most dangerous economic illusions of our time.
The Air Force paid nearly $150,000 above market value for airplane bathroom fixtures, a Department of Defense watchdog found.
Both candidates have promised a litany of special favors to handpicked constituencies. If you don't fit into the right categories, you'll pay the price.
Yes, cheap imports hurt some American companies. But protectionist trade policy harms many more Americans than it helps.
Boeing throws conventional wisdom out the window, among other things.
The former South Carolina governor can't decide whether she likes corporate subsidies or opposes them on principle.
It would result in shortages, decreases in productivity, and higher production costs affecting millions of American workers and nearly every consumer.
Big corporations and entire industries constantly use their connections in Congress to get favors, no matter which party is in power.
Why should we believe that this boondoggle will produce better results than hundreds of other corporate welfare programs?
Boeing may love an additional handout, but such subsidies will be a net negative for the country's economy as a whole.
My filings yesterday on behalf of the fifteen families who lost loved ones in the Boeing 737 MAX crashes explains why the Justice Department could not keep victims' families in the dark when it negotiated its immunity deal with Boeing.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10