John Arnold: Government Can't Be Trusted To Fix Any Problems
John Arnold argues that private markets solve problems better than government or philanthropy, and that real reform comes from decentralization, incentives, and evidence—not top-down control.
Today's guest is John Arnold—the former Enron wunderkind and billionaire philanthropist (and Reason Foundation supporter) who's determined to hack America's most expensive and least accountable public sector systems in areas such as criminal justice, education, and pensions. (Fun fact: He was once called "the most hated man in pensionland" by Governing magazine due to his reform efforts.)
Reason's Nick Gillespie and Arnold talk about why public pensions are so out of control and how to fix them; how Medicare squeezes billions of unnecessary dollars out of taxpayers; and how Enron scammed its investors not despite regulations but in full view of them. And they discuss why, despite all the country's problems, Arnold is still betting on America to get better, not worse.
Subscribe to the new YouTube channel for The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie!
- Video Editor: Ian Keyser
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
the former Enron wunderkind
*looks around*
I guess he's not wrong, there are definitely some things the private sector does better than government.
I had always heard his basic story, that it was really stupid of governments, especially California with Gov Gray, to deregulate only the wholesale side, not the retail side, putting utilities in a real bind and preventing them from providing any realistic price signal feedback to the wholesalers. But this was all a long time ago and I've forgotten whatever details I used to think I knew.
>"and that real reform comes from decentralization, incentives, and evidence—not top-down control.
But remember - we must oppose any attempt by Trump to cut government size and spending. Orange-man Bad.
Any change must go through a multi year process, directed by Congress, to instruct a paid committee, to give recommendations to congress, to pass off to the executive, to go through extensive rule making to make said change.
Pelosi in many cases eliminated the committee.
Change is NOT what is needed. That is the argument that Woodrow Wilson used to start off most of the problems we have today. Pace Wilson the first step is to revive our Founding Principles, those shared beliefs that literally forge a nation out of so many diverse folks. Sounds silly but often think how wonderfully improved everything would be if we just accepted
all men are created equal
they are endowed by their Creator with unalienable rights
government exists to protect those rights
IN my llifetime the Marxist denial of these American principles resulted in governments killling almost 120 million of their own citizens, Just in the 20th Century , which Churchill declared the bloodiest in history.
I never see Reason affirm any of those principles , not openly or even by implication.
Neither can the for-profit private government contractor sector, which churns out failures at much higher cost than governments, and has no incentive to consider public interest. If anything, the private non-profit contractor sector does even worse. So if governments, for-profits and non-profits can't be trusted to fix problems, who's left?
Okay but why look for the HIllary Clinton perfect solution, This is not heaven !!!
Whe ended slavery, who is fighting for rights of the unborn, who champions freedom of religion. YOU missed history's big engine
"In his Study of History Toynbee describes the rise and decline of 23 civilisations. His over-arching analysis was the place of moral and religious challenge, and response to such challenge, as the reason for the robustness or decline of a civilisation. "
As Jesus said , either individual humans get better or ALL GETS WORSE. The bit about the leaven and the city on the hill.
And to tie it all together
JOHN WINTHROP
Winthrop's "city on a hill" concept, popularized in his 1630 sermon, became a symbol of American exceptionalism and the nation's aspiration to be a beacon of freedom and democracy
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
". I recollect thinking then, boy even though I was, that there must have been something more than common that those men struggled for; that something even more than National Independence; that something that held out a great promise to all the people of the world to all time to come; I am exceedingly anxious that this Union, the Constitution, and the liberties of the people shall be perpetuated in accordance with the original idea for which that struggle was made, and I shall be most happy indeed if I shall be an humble instrument in the hands of the Almighty, and of this, his almost chosen people, for perpetuating the object of that great struggle. "
Is that you Hillary ???? Arguing again that every solution stinks so let's just die ...Is that you Hilllary ?
And again...
The only problem the 'Guns' (Gov-Guns) tool has any ability to fix is defending one against someone else's criminal 'gun' to ensure Individual Liberty and Justice for all.
'Guns' don't fix stuff.
Pretending that it can is just like turning the 'government' into criminals. (see above)
This is Biden-type nonsense
Biden (seemingly like you) thinks that if you take the gun from an asocial deviant who would kill randomly a bunch of kids -- hey, problem solved. But is it nothing at all that such a beast is walking around and needs only a gun (or whatever else he finds) to wreak havoc !!!
It's family, perversion, no-fault divorce, abortion, etc. that are the cancer producing many of these monsters. It is not guns , it is even less suppressing guns...it's what kind of people are out there. When I saw Biden's utter joy at bringing these two into high office I saw things clearly and it's never left me
https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/11/sam-brinton-005.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=768
Wrong. Biden wants to take away EVERYONE'S personal gun pre-emptively while Using MORE and MORE Gov-Guns aggressively against them (BIG 'government' 'guns').
When said beast does get a-hold of a gun and "wreaks havoc" what tool are you going to use to stop them? The bible?
The point is ... It's important that Gov-Guns are used in a defensive manner and not an aggressive manner otherwise government becomes the criminal "wreaking havoc" instead of the defender of Liberty and Justice for all.
TJJ2000 , must be your lack of self-awareness that makes you publicly post a mocking of the real answer. Yes, TJJ2000 , there is evil in the world and much of it is from immorality (look at the major meta-analyses coming out now about the much higher anti-social and depraved tendencies associated with TRANS folk...then check this photo https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/11/sam-brinton-005.jpg?quality=75&strip=all&w=768
You admit the problem isn't guns !!! No self-awareness
Oh , and TJJ, not to be uber-logical but in every case but the one of two criminals having a gun fight, there MUST be a defensive and an aggressive use. Think for a minute
Wrong Again. Just because there's an Aggressor doesn't mean there's always a defender. Maybe 'the people' will just sit back and take the aggression.
Being a defender does require an aggression. Gov-Gunning 'moral' dictation is an aggressive use of Gov-Guns that not only takes Individual Liberty away but has ZERO-Justice for all involved (i.e. How does your mandatory 'morality' ensure your own rights?) Will the people defend themselves against that aggression you're pitching?
I agree with you that most of the aggression is coming from immoral people but being aggressive against their 'moral' behavior instead of their acts of aggression is just adding more coals to the fire.
I am not arguing for Puritan attacks on any and all immorality, But some must be attacked
" Aquinas emphasizes that attaining moral
perfection is the aim of divine law; human law instead “falls short of the eternal law” and “does not prohibit everything that is forbidden by the natural law.” For human law, it suffices not to contradict divine or natural law or not to demand the performance of acts that contradict them"
So don't force doctors to perform abortions, don't surrender baby boys to two homosexual "parents", don't allow pornography to pollute young minds, don't allow sht perversion literature into schools, esp ones where the students don't know the Great Books, ETC
We need more coals on the fire. Must we keep the fire torturing us for decades. Bring to white heat and settle things. Your solution is the worst of all possiblities, society dying by the attrition of violence, perversion, family decay because we are too chicken to add the needed coals. Stop gays adopting children, listen to the meta-analyses that say trans surgery effects no good and those people are sick. Lia, Dylan Mulvaney, all the faggy guys "completing" against girls and then limp wristing so you feel sorry.
Get the bastards some help. Start with Pete Buttigieg a most distgusting jerk. Two gays adoptiong a boy. No mother, just two sick fags playing at being adults
DISGUSTING
https://i.redd.it/lut9tc0f7il71.jpg