Vernon Smith: Adam Smith's Relevance, Jimmy Carter's Deregulation, and the Fed's Biggest Mistake
"The greatest thing that ever happened to me was to be born in a free country of modest means and to have opportunities," says the Nobel Prize–winning economist.

My guest today is one of my favorite people in the world. Vernon Smith is the 2002 winner of the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for his pioneering work in experimental economics. He's almost certainly the only male Nobel Prize winner who showed up with a ponytail and an Adam Smith bolo tie. More than anybody else, Smith is responsible for taking economics out of the lecture hall and testing its hypotheses by running actual experiments with living, breathing humans.
Born in Kansas in 1927, Smith has lived a life that sounds like a Bob Dylan song. His mother's first husband died in a freak railroad accident, and she used the insurance money to buy a farm that sustained her family during the darkest days of the Great Depression. An engineering whiz, he graduated from the California Institute of Technology in 1949 and then turned to studying economics, first at Kansas University and then Harvard. He's taught all over the country, especially at places far flung from big cities, doing much of his most important work at Purdue University and the University of Arizona. He's currently at Chapman University in Southern California, where he created the Smith Institute for Political Economy and Philosophy, which seeks to "reintegrate the study of the humanities and economics in the spirit of Adam Smith."
I caught up with Smith recently at Reason Weekend, an annual conference sponsored by the nonprofit that publishes this podcast. We talked about the upcoming 300th birthday of Adam Smith and why The Wealth of Nations author remains absolutely essential to understanding the contemporary world—Vernon gives him a special birthday greeting at the start of this show.
We also talked about the people that he namechecked in his Nobel toast—an inspired group that included his co-Nobelist Daniel Kahneman, Friedrich Hayek, and the poet Kahlil Gibran—and his impressions of former President Jimmy Carter, who won the Nobel Peace Prize the same year that Vernon won the economics prize. Smith calls Carter "the great deregulator" and shares a wonderful story about the former president learning late in life how governments and bureaucracies often get in the way of people trying to help one another.
Today's sponsors:
- DonorsTrust. DonorsTrust is the principled, tax-friendly way to simplify your charitable giving. Do you want to make a real difference in the world instead of relying on ineffectual government programs? Do you want to push back against heavy-handed government regulations that encroach on civil liberties, especially after living through the corruption that became so apparent during the pandemic? Consider opening a giving account with the folks at DonorsTrust. The DonorsTrust team understands the conservative and libertarian philanthropic landscape, and they know which charities are clawing back our civil liberties. For more information on how DonorsTrust can help you with your charitable giving, visit www.donorstrust.org/nick to receive a free copy of their donor prospectus.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I’am making over $140 an hour working online with 2 kids at home. I neverthought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 17k a month doingthis and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless .And bestthing is..It’s so Easy..Copy below website to check it..,
.
.
This Website➤——————————————-➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
Smith calls Carter "the great deregulator"
The most libertarian President since Coolidge by far.
And no Trump Cultists, it is not Fatass (Big Spender) Donnie by any stretch of your imagination.
He certainly had the malaise...
ASDFg
Coolidge was not LIbertarian
He said, in utter contempt of Libertarianism :
" If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. "
Calvin Coolidge Says, December 24, 1930
Date: December 24, 1930
Location: Northampton, MA
Summary: In this Christmas greeting, Coolidge spells out the reason for the season. He recounts the virtues, sacrifice, and saving grace of Jesus Christ, and discusses how Christ influences mankind to be more loving and merciful. This, for Coolidge, is the true meaning of Christmas.
>>Born in Kansas
good start.
Is the foundation of a tall building still relevant, even after additional stories have been built on? Adam Smith was the first economic tract I read as a youth, long before I even knew what "libertarian" meant. Although it sucks having to say, "Because nothing else ever has or ever will work better" when people ask why I prefer spontaneous order and free markets, but there it is. It's an eternal truth that no one has ever successfully controverted, no matter how brilliant the efforts have been. I'm glad that the Nobel Prize Committee continues to recognize non-socialist free market thinkers long after abandoning liberty in every other way.
I’m glad that the Nobel Prize Committee continues to recognize non-socialist free market thinkers long after abandoning liberty in every other way.
This is a tricky area of discussion which is too long and involved... but Peter Hitchens has discussed this type of thing. You're abandoning liberty, limited government and other concepts wholesale, but the answer to everything else is "more markets". In my rapidly advancing age, I'm starting to agree that it doesn't lead to great outcomes.
Victor Davis Hanson has also touched on this subject in a different way:
Neocons: Let the market adjudicate the border, when wages drop below a dollar an hour, they'll stop coming! Problem solved!
Sorry, but I didn't follow that. Who is abandoning liberty? What is the "everything else" to which "more markets" is the answer? And what doesn't lead to great outcomes?
Both political parties, but Team Blue in particular has had a 20 year hard on for centralized power in the executive agencies.
But the killer drugs and diseases enter. And the ignoranat masses with no knowledge of how our country works will only want more of the Biden handouts.
Problem exacerbated
"I’m glad that the Nobel Prize Committee continues to recognize non-socialist free market thinkers long after abandoning liberty in every other way."
Let us note he won this at the same time Carter was winning his, 20 years ago.
"“Because nothing else ever has or ever will work better”"
The way I often put it is that Smith explains a fundamental framework of human cooperation. It is as cogent as Geometry, Calculous, Molecular Chemistry or numerous other sciences. It wasn't necessarily that he had all the answers- he described a system that is really good at adaptation and finding answers.
He won it back in 2002. They've changed, along with a bunch of other formerly respectable awards.
Nobel Prizes
Emmies
pulitzers
And a bunch more I'm sure.
Oscars now have an explicit race requirement for eligibility.
The Pulitzer Prize hasn't been respectable since 1932, when it was awarded to Walter Duranty for his assistance to the Soviet Union in covering up the Holodomor.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com