Wallowing Around in a Gerontocracy
Plus: The editors consider what type of fresh attacks the marijuana legalization movement is likely to encounter.

In this week's The Reason Roundtable, Matt Welch is back alongside editors Peter Suderman, Katherine Mangu-Ward, and Nick Gillespie as they wade through the missteps of our modern gerontocracy.
0:32: Nancy Pelosi's countless failures
23:23: President Joe Biden turns 80 years old
36:30: Weekly Listener Question:
Hi Friends! I like weed. Marijuana is a wonderful drug (I don't know why we keep looking for female Viagra when it already exists), and I celebrate recent expansions of legalization. There are risks, just as there are with any drug, and there is a potential for abuse. Nonetheless, if you compare the damage done by weed with the damage done by the war on drugs, it's not even close. Unsurprisingly, I have noted an uptick in news items describing the dangers of marijuana. Yesterday, The Wall Street Journal declared, "Marijuana May Hurt Smokers More Than Cigarettes Alone." The conclusion was based on a study of a whopping six marijuana-only smokers. This news trend makes me nervous. What attacks can we expect now that legalization is spreading? I'm thinking flimsy studies to convince everyone it's a major health risk (from the left) and stories about psychosis (from the right). What do you think is the next move against legal marijuana, and how can we anticipate it?
46:53: Donald Trump returns
52:51: This week's cultural recommendations
Mentioned in this podcast:
"Nancy Pelosi Embodied America's Gerontocracy Problem," by Eric Boehm
"After House Democrats' Midterm Defeat, Nancy Pelosi Says She'll Step Down From Congressional Leadership," by Christian Britschgi
"Dianne Feinstein and the Dangers of Gerontocracy," by Peter Suderman
"Joe Biden: 'Why the Hell Would I Take a Test?…Are You a Junkie?'" by Nick Gillespie
"Pot Prohibition Continues Collapsing, and Psychedelic Bans Could Be Next," by Jacob Sullum
"Republicans Contemplate a Post-Trump World," by J.D. Tuccille
"Donald Trump Announces He Will Run for President in 2024," by Joe Lancaster
Send your questions to roundtable@reason.com. Be sure to include your social media handle and the correct pronunciation of your name.
Today's sponsor:
- We all want to make sure our family is protected in a medical emergency. What many of us don't realize is that health insurance won't always cover the full amount of an emergency medical flight. Even with comprehensive coverage, you could get hit with high deductibles and co-pays. That's why an AirMedCare Network membership is so important. As a member, if an emergency arises, you won't see a bill for air medical transport when flown by an AMCN provider. Best of all, a membership covers your entire household for as little as $65 a year for seniors. AMCN providers are called upon to transport more than 100,000 patients a year. This is coverage no family should be without. Now, as a listener of our show, you'll get up to a $75 Visa or Amazon gift card with a new membership. Simply visit AirMedCareNetwork.com/reason and use offer code REASON.
Audio production by Ian Keyser
Assistant production by Hunt Beaty
Music: "Angeline," by The Brothers Steve
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Vote everyone out, it’s not supposed to be a career.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by (ins-05) doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
We will not be permitted to do that.
How many of the six subjects were WSJ ED Board Members?
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
>> I like weed. Marijuana is a wonderful drug
I promise I'm not the Weekly Listener
I have even managed $20,000 per calendar month by simply working some easy tasks from my apartment. As I had lost my office career, I was very disturbed but luckily I’ve discovered this best on-line career that’s why I’m capable of earning a thousand USD just from home. Each person can avail this best offer & collect more greenbacks online
HERE====)> http://pay.hiring9.com/
Marijuana should be legal, but it's not a wonderful drug. The idea that smoking leaves isn't harmful for your lungs because it's not tobacco is pretty silly.
Progressives have to pretend it's harmless because if it were harmful it would have to be banned.
You don’t have to smoke. There are gummies, vapes and drink powders.
"The idea that smoking leaves"
You're doing it wrong.
The stems and seeds are where it’s at.
Not according to Commander Cody & His Lost Planet Airmen. 🙂
Down to Seeds and Stems Again Blues
https://youtu.be/3wJXPtk05mI
Or your brain.
Young people can be tyrants and old people can be non-tyrants.
Old people are also capable of adopting the latest bad ideas from younger advisors and cultural influencers.
So judge the senior citizens, as well as the junior citizens, on their merits.
So judge the senior citizens, as well as the junior citizens, on their
meritsskin color.Among Black and brown people in the US, the young/old political split is inverted these days. Young POCs are more conservative than elderly POCs.
Stay-at-home mom Kelly Richards from New York after quitting her full-time job managed to earn an average of between $6,000 and $8,000 a month freelancing at home...
Here's how she did it..............>>> onlinecareer1
Wallowing in Nancy’s Gerontocracy is fun! We’re talking an inflatable pool filled with jello, so lots of lubricant (which you’ll need)!
I thought that was only happening when Nancy was out of town.
You’ll need the lubricant to slip out of her hands, slide down her stairs, and make an es-cape! 🙂
Is “Wallowing in a Gerontocracy” this Holiday Season’s version of “Walking in a Winter Wonderland?” 😉
One of us guys has to fall on the sword and find out: Does she dye her hair down there too?
You first.
If she uses that stuff to make Punk spikes, it really would be like falling on a sword. 😉
But more likely, it would be like the bathtub scene from The Shining.
https://youtu.be/7FgGxFjte1E
Being Pan can be a real life-saver. It gives you a reserve chute, a glider, and a rocket pack as redundancies. 🙂
Tweety Bird also turned 80 this year and in contrast to FJB he actually did see a putty tat.
Y'all misspelled 'kleptocracy'.
I'm just here to help.
“Just Here To Help” is a government job and they’re a Union Shop, Bud!
All we'd have to do is pair Government with "Oh, so you want to help Ike" Turner and Government's job would be cake. 😉
Regarding the weekly *checks wording* "listener question", I can't help but comment:
Unsurprisingly, I have noted an uptick in news items describing the dangers of marijuana. Yesterday, The Wall Street Journal declared, "Marijuana May Hurt Smokers More Than Cigarettes Alone." The conclusion was based on a study of a whopping six marijuana-only smokers. This news trend makes me nervous. What attacks can we expect now that legalization is spreading? I'm thinking flimsy studies to convince everyone it's a major health risk (from the left) and stories about psychosis (from the right). What do you think is the next move against legal marijuana, and how can we anticipate it?
So you thought that those nominally liberal dudes in the media, so many of whom were "critical" of the "war on drugs" were going to be your friends?
When the President is 80, it's definitely a gerontocracy.
Just make age 70 mandatory retirement age for any government jobs, including elected and appointed ones.
Senator Feinstein is 89 and dumber than my door knocker.
This is the Party of Youth , remember that ?
Unsurprisingly, I have seen a rise in news reports highlighting marijuana’s risks. The Wall Street Journal published an article yesterday stating that “Marijuana May Hurt Smokers More Than Cigarettes Alone.” The finding was drawn from a research that included an astounding six marijuana-only users. This news pattern worries me. What types of assaults should we anticipate if legalisation gains traction? I’m considering weak scientific evidence (from the left) to persuade everyone that it poses a serious health risk and accounts of psychosis (from the right). What do you believe the next step will be in the fight against legal marijuana, and how can we prepare for it?0
Read More: Medical Coding
Services
Nick taking the "it's actually the young people who suck" - classic. Call me when he's gone; if i wanted to hear old people with shit takes interrupt each other i'd watch The View.