Penn Jillette: Did His Libertarianism Survive Trump and COVID?
The larger, louder half of Penn & Teller talks masks, vaccines, compassion, Bob Dylan, and much, much more.

Today's episode—my absolute favorite to date, after almost six years!—is a marathon session with Penn Jillette, the larger, louder half of the fantastical and magical duo Penn & Teller.
Since the 1980s, Penn & Teller have been part of a broad movement to freakify and weirdo-ize American culture in a way that is profoundly individualistic and idealistic. They have helped to create a world where conformity has increasingly given way to self-expression. Before them, to me at least, magic was something dull, something mostly old men did, with boring card tricks, hokey gimmicks, capes, and magic wands. It was Doug Henning on Broadway with feather bangs and Harry Blackstone Jr. making Jiffy Pop on the stove.
Penn & Teller were so different, so alive and fresh, deconstructing magic at the very time they were blowing your mind. They were the reincarnation of Harry Houdini, with a punk attitude, and to me as a kid growing up in suburban New Jersey, they helped make me believe all things were possible, that you could create the life you wanted. Their fantastic show Bullshit! ran for eight seasons on Showtime, during which they debunked everything from alien abductions to the drug war to penis pumps to xenophobia (they even had me on that episode, speaking up for loosening the borders).
Penn especially captivated me: For my entire adult life, he's been one of the most vocal and visible self-identified libertarians out there, always insisting that, as a starting point in any discussion of any issue or problem, we should start by asking, "Can this be addressed by giving people more freedom to make their own choices?"
As impressive: In the mid-2010s, he dropped 100 pounds in three months for health reasons—personifying the personal responsibility and self-improvement near the very center of libertarianism (check out my 2016 interview with him on all that).
But then, in July 2020, he told the excellent website Big Think that the combination of Donald Trump's election four years earlier and the onset of the COVID pandemic was forcing him to rethink his libertarianism. In a video interview titled "The Year That Broke America's Illusions," he went so far as to say that "libertarianism has been so distorted, I don't know if I have to pull my name out of that ring. It's been adopted by people who don't seem to hold the responsibility side of it and don't seem to hold the compassion side of it." He even likened not wearing masks to drunk driving.
As you can imagine, his comments sent shock waves through the libertarian movement. For many of us, trillions in wasted spending, contradictory guidance from public health officials, arbitrary school and business shutdowns, and absurd policies like closing beaches and outdoor dining have made us even more skeptical of government power.
Why did the 2016 election and the pandemic cause one of the best-known libertarians to seemingly go in the other direction?
I recently attended FreedomFest in Las Vegas, where Penn & Teller have a longstanding residency at the Rio Casino, and caught up with Penn on the set of his popular podcast Penn's Sunday School to talk about Donald Trump, COVID restrictions, and whether his view of the world has really changed. Also joining the conversation was Matt Donnelly, a cohost of Penn's Sunday School.
Over nearly two hours, I talked with Penn about Trump, COVID, Bob Dylan, and the $64,000 question: Has libertarianism changed—or has he?
Today's sponsors:
- You probably take better care of your car than you do of your brain! Get a mental health check-up already! BetterHelp is an accessible and affordable source for professional, confidential counseling. BetterHelp assesses your needs and matches you with a licensed therapist to whom you can start talking in under 48 hours, all online. I've used the service myself and had a great experience with it. I'm happy to let you know that as a Reason Interview listener, you'll get 10 percent off your first month by visiting our sponsor at BetterHelp.com/TRI.
- The Reason Rundown with Peter Suderman. Free minds. Free markets. Big stories. That's The Reason Rundown, which comes out every Friday. End the week with concise, thought-provoking stories from the journalists at Reason, the magazine of logic, not legends; coherence, not contradictions. Hosted by Features Editor Peter Suderman, each episode he talks to a single Reason journalist about a single big story. Subscribe today.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Before them, to me at least, magic was something dull, something mostly old men did, with boring card tricks, hokey gimmicks, capes, and magic wands.
I'm curious if he said this to Penn during the interview and if so, did he find it annoying?
"You know that thing you love and dedicated your life to? Weren't they all just a bunch of boooores before you?"
I made $30k in just 5 weeks working part-time right from my apartment. When I lost my last business I got tired right away and luckily I found this job online and with that I am able to start reaping lots right through my house. Anyone can achieve this top level career and make more money online by:-
Reading this article:>> http://oldprofits.blogspot.com
I doubt Penn would be insulted. He has made similar statements.
Also, Penn considers himself a juggler who has the luck to fall in with a talented magician.
Teller is the brains of the operation, I think.
Where tf is the gd transcript? People actually wasted two hours of their lives listening at a snails pace to this?
FUCK
He even likened not wearing masks to drunk driving.
Lost all respect I had for him.
NOW you lose respect....didnt he endorse clinton?
I didn't have any respect for him to lose and I give zero shits about his take. However, there is a libertarian case to be made "We shouldn't arrest and/or investigate drunk drivers until they actually damage someone or something and, even then, their drunk driving shouldn't be an investigation-terminating sole cause. Likewise, we shouldn't arrest and/or investigate anyone for not wearing a mask until they actually pass COVID on and, even then, the burden of proof shouldn't lie with the accused."
But, zero respect, your implication is probably right and he probably went with "We should throw anti-mask *mandate* people in jail the way we throw drunk drivers in jail."
Not sure that libertarian case can be made. Sure it can be argued, but exposing someone to excessive risk is a violation of the NAP. All of life is a risk, but exposing a third party to an excessive risk not of their choosing fall under the category of harm.
So no drunk driving unless on your own private roads. Even if think you are not drunk.
But being over .08% BAC isn't exposing people to undue danger per se. Different people react to alcohol differently. And things like being sleep deprived or having bratty kids in the car with you can be just as potentially dangerous as being drunk.
or this
Providing anyone, driving or not, with an alcoholic beverage exposes them to all sorts of excessive risk, whether it's from cirrhosis or a car accident. Allowing people to have sex with whomever they feel like exposes them to all sorts of excessive risk. Allowing people to enter bodies of water exposes them to excessive risk.
Aggression and risk are not associated. Aggression and hostility are, definitively.
Arguing that the burden of proof lies with the accused is both hostile and exposes people to excessive risk.
Yeah, WTF? Masks were obvious bullshit from the start as a broad heath measure. And now we have plenty of evidence to back that up.
And even if it was valid, if you are going to be libertarian, you need to accept that some people will not do what you think they should.
"the combination of Donald Trump's election four years earlier and the onset of the COVID pandemic was forcing him to rethink his libertarianism."
If that did it then he was probably never a libertarian. Really, the Covid nonsense should have pushed him towards more libertarianism, not less.
He always struck me more as a bog-standard blue check liberal. He was using libertarianism as a way of appearing contrarian, but also showing that he was socially left and totally cool with the way that sex and drugs works for the American upper-middle class elite.
^THIS^
Do you sell you libertarian litmus test?
He described you and Jeff. No wonder you're offended.
Penn didn't like Trump. True libertarians love Trump. Therefore Penn was never a libertarian.
True libertarians love Trump.
No, true libertarians remain libertarians whether the president is Trump, Obama, Bush or Jesus H. Christ incarnate. If you're willing to sell out your libertarianism because OrangeManBad or you don't want to get confused with those icky deplorables, it's safe to say your libertarianism was never much more than a pose. It's not how strictly you hold to your principles when its you, your friends and those you approve of benefiting from those principles that speaks to how strongly you hold those principles. It's how strictly you hold to your principles when its your enemies, people you consider ignorant hicks, people you have contempt for who are benefitting.
If you're willing to sell out your libertarianism because OrangeManBad or you don't want to get confused with those icky deplorables
That explains everyone who didn't vote for Trump. Yup. That's it. You're a true libertarian who supports Trump or you're an unwitting leftist.
Reading comprehension is hard when you’re a broke ass alcoholic.
Funny. I didn't say a word about supporting or voting for Trump. You're the only one here (well, except for Reason's writing staff) making the absurd dichotomy between being a Trump supporter and being willing to dispense with libertarian principle to oppose him. I'd suggest a true libertarian was a guy who had the same principles and views before Trump was president, while Trump was president, and after Trump was president. If you're positing Trump as a "special case", it's only reasonable to question else might prove a "special case" worthy of sacrificing libertarian principle.
You are more pragmatic than me.
He’s not broken like you.
Lol. So pathetic.
He’s not drunk and angry like you.
I don't think that's what he's saying at all. Rather, if you have any libertarian principles, people electing someone you don't like or using their freedom in ways you don't approve of should not change anything. If you didn't know that was part of the whole freedom thing, then you never were really all that committed to it.
“Most libertarian president in modern times” because he did a minor tax cut or something like that.
And the no wars thing. And the energy independence thing. Just minor details.
that he has to minimize the real list that distinguished trump from the others in a libertarian affinity test tells you he has an agenda.
not that we dont know this already.
I think Jeffy is worse than Sarc. At least part of Sarc’s dreadfulness stems form him being an angry drunk. Jeffy is a considered progtard who has carefully thought out his leftism and shameless dishonesty. Sarc is more conventionally pathetic.
I've never seen you come out against genital mutilation. Why do you encourage genital mutilation?
You just described Pedo Jeffy.
He has. Just last week Ted objected to castrating and giving mastectomies to minors when your good pal chemjeff was pushing it.
Nope. Sarc will go wherever he thinks he has an ally. Look at the morning thread. He is full on a lapdog for jeff now. He has no actual principles.
Why did you support the genocide in Rwanda? You never said you didn't. That means you did.
Sad.
Poor sarc
How do you know Jesse hasn't spoken against the Rwandan Genocide, you drunken fuck.
Last year in a conversation with Jesse about the Uighur holocaust, I compared Disney and the NBA's whitewashing to Radio Television Libre des Mille Collines and he agreed. Not direct condemnation but condemnation nonetheless.
Why did you spend thousands of dollars to get a machete used in the massacre, that is still stained with blood?
You never said you didn't. That means you did.
You sick fuck.
I see you trying to shift the blame for buying that blood-stained machete to someone else.
HOW CAN YOU BE TALKING ABOUT MACHETES AT A TIME LIKE THIS WHEN JOE BIDEN IS LITERALLY MURDERING PUPPIES AND DESTROYING AMERICA AS WE SPEAK?????
Do you retards imagine this schtick is clever?
They actually do. Which is even more hilarious.
Jesus. The levels of cringe this is hitting is astronomical.
"You never said you didn't. That means you did."
Tomorrow I'm going to have to teach sarcasmic what sophistry means.
I wouldn’t bother.
That is the libertarian litmus test, apparently. Especially under the new Mises Caucus regime. One may NOT consider the consequences of individual actions upon a community.
p.s. Penn Jillette does not do drugs. Not even alcohol. Dunno about his sex life. But since when are libertarians opposed to what one does in the privacy of their own bedroom?
You can consider them all you want. And if something rises to the level of aggression against another then you can even do something about it. But if seeing people make their own judgements about things and acting on those judgements makes you question your commitment to individual liberty, then you aren't really all that committed to it.
I mean, really. How can you claim to believe in liberty and freedom, yet demand that people only behave a certain way with that liberty and freedom.
Yeah, the fact that people might do things you disapprove of is kind of part of the deal.
Yes Sarcasmic, The quickest dirtiest and most affective Litmus is if you, Joe or Jeff agree with something or someone, it’s probably not libertarian.
He was always a Libertine, not a Libertarian.
Same with Bill Maher, who once upon a time tried on the label.
Same with Bill Maher, who once upon a time tried on the label.
And would nevertheless treat actual libertarians as some sort of foreign monsters.
Penn never drank or did drugs once in his life, according to episodes of Bullshit. Which had a few good seasons.
It is a shame he seems incapable of applying the same formula to current bullshit. I guess that’s what makes me not trust his perspective anymore. Beyond that, he’s got that militant style atheism that can occasionally lead him to say dumb stuff too. (I’m an atheist myself, but I’ve never understood the pro-active, overtly hostile to religion types).
Have you met Encog?
Thanks for the intro! 😉
Greetings! Encog here! 🙂
I haven't watched the video or listened to the podcast yet, so I'll give my judgement of Penn's interview later.
All this said, what is the opposite of "Pro-Active, overtly hostile to religion" Atheism? Being a doormat to mystical, superstitious Bullshit that carries the day in every part of our society? Mind you, that includes the iconography and the beginning prayer of most every meeting of every City Council, County Commission, State Legislature, and the Supreme Court.
And just how has that worked out in our HellScape on Earth where you can and choose your Shit Hits The Fan scenario?
As long as religions speak and act hostile to Reason and Freedom, I'll speak and back.
Militant Christians shoot up and bomb abortion clinics, Militant Muslims fly planes into buildings, Militant Hindus beat up "untouchables," Militant Orthodox Jews riot against anyone else becoming citizens of Israel, Militant Buddhists practice foot-binding of women...but all the Militant Atheists I've seen just rant on blogs, YouTube, Forums, and Internet comment sections. I wish ranting was all there was to religion and I could ignore it.
Addendum: "pick and choose your Shit Hits the Fan scenario" and "I'll speak and act back."
Rarely do you find people committing acts in the name of the absence of something, which is why you won't find too many people claiming to commit acts of violence in the name of atheism. So yeah, "militant atheism" is a contradiction in terms in the way you're describing.
That said, there are and have been plenty of militant people who happened to be atheists who killed plenty of people. Joseph Stalin's a pretty notable atheist, and he racked up a decent body count, far more than your average Christian or Muslim extremist.
I think the opposite of "proactive, overtly hostile to religion" version of atheist describes the majority of atheists. Most atheists are content to live and let live quietly, non-confrontationally, as long as you're not harming anyone* in the application of your beliefs.
*Harm is, of course, subjective, so I won't go deeper into that rabbit hole.
It’s because you are an atheist, not an anti-theist. Militant atheist is a contradiction. It’s like a equating apolitical to an revolutionary anarchist.
They are not even slightly equivalent, one you’re nonchalant/apathetic/unmoved by - the other you have a very strong and active opinion.
He was using libertarianism as a way of appearing contrarian
^
I've also always imagined him as the type who reads Skeptic magazine and quotes it as gospel truth.
Yeah, he's clearly nothing more than a fedora-tipper who might think convincing five-year-olds that mutilating themselves to become the opposite sex is out of bounds, but will still job out if such thinking becomes mainstreamed by his celebrity buddies.
Except he couldn't've been just that, because he always favored free enterprise.
It may seem amazing these days because of how the discussion's been focused and polarized around here, but free enterprise is probably the most important thing we're about. And on balance, that's the thing Penn and the Donald most agree on, at least relative to the environment and climate of opinion we're operating in. But it's like all that's been cast out of mind and we're arguing about Mexicans.
Pretty sure that Penn would not agree that free enterprise is more important than things like sexual freedom, freedom of speech, etc.
But free enterprise is the most important thing that we're about. Meaning that that's where the greatest number of actions and controversies come up that we'd have opinions about. Sexual freedom and freedom of speech have relatively few incidents of consequence and controversy. The overwhelming majority of government actions from day to day concern details of enterprise, not of sex or speech, so if we had fair coverage of them here, those would be the things we'd be discussing the most.
Instead we're sucked into controversies about things that aren't on the point of major changes regarding who goes to jail, for instance. Whatever's the controversy regarding sex affects very few people's actual freedom. There's plenty of sexual repression in the world, but nothing's going to change that this week. Same regarding speech. But today there's a judge somewhere in the world who's putting a great number of people out of business — some business — this instant.
It’s like you are throwing a tantrum because others care about different libertarian priorities than you do.
Roberta, Yes this is one of our primary pillars of understanding of how things are supposed to work, a principal, if you will. The fact that it’s confusing to Mike is chilling
I think Penn would view them as being indivisible or you don’t have freedom. At least he used to make that fairly explicit on BS.
Bullshit was a hella libertarian show for it’s time. Which is why I find his current confusion as to who the baddies are and the knee jerk TDS depressing. But it’s not uncommon. Especially amongst libertarians who are completely surrounded by screaming lefties as are anyone in showbiz.
Yeah, time to differentiate between a belief system and a pose.
Penn had a pose. Little more.
I'm going to listen to this.
Nobody cares.
Absolutely. I’m a member of Penn’s congregation, although I don’t have time to listen to his podcast anymore.
I don't have time to listen either, because it's boring. 15 years ago he had a radio show for a year that was extremely interesting and entertaining, so he's capable of it. He seems to be less fun these days.
He lost his edge when he lost all the weight. Maybe not eating meat really does turn you into a pussy.
Notes.
0:04:20. Every politician is a liar and psychopath. Anyone who thinks Hillary would have done less damage than Trump is a fucking idiot; she'd have been a non-senile Biden with even more psychopathy. Thinking Trump was less dangerous than Hillary or Biden is no more a marker of libertarianism than liking Bob Dylan.
0:23:00: Finally got off Bob Dylan by discussing Trump. Yay.
That quote, "Can this be addressed by giving people more freedom to make their own choices?", and his rejection of it in the case of a nut running through town shooting people, shows an incredibly shallow understanding of freedom. What part of freedom involves hurting other people? Don't hurt people, don't take their stuff. If he can't understand that, maybe he needs Hillary and Biden. I don't need any of them.
If you think Trump's views on immigration and tariffs are bad, how can you possibly think Hillary and Biden are any better? If you think Trump was the first President dumber than you, do you really think Bush Jr. was smarter, or Nixon? Clinton probably had more political savvy than you, but smart? Give me a break.
And that's when I quit listening.
I mean reason actually thought biden was better than trump. And here we are 2 years later.
They will never admit they were wrong or how they ignored the debates and campaign promises of Biden.
Well, to be fair, there was an "enfeebled president" argument, they were right, they got an enfeebled president, but because they were either high on legal weed or literally skipped history class, they didn't realize how much damage can come out of an enfeebled leader.
Henry VI comes to mind.
That legal weed must be some bad stuff. I'm glad I stick to the illicit kind.
This really pisses me off, this attitude that Trump was the worst President ever, that Hillary would have been better, that he did nothing good, was a psychopath and the dumbest President ever.
Yes, Trump was no libertarian, and I despise his xenophobia and economic ignorance. He didn't get rid of Fauci and he installed Brix. But good grief! Was Trump's figurative "pussy grabbing" really worse than Bill Clinton's literal intern raping and Hillary's literal enabling? Was Trump's Jan 6th speechifying really worse than Hillary's literal Russian scam? Was Trump's hotel actually worse than Hillary's actual scam charitable foundation soliciting bribes and doling out a tiny fraction? Did Trump run a known illegal mail server and delete its incriminating emails? Did Trump cover up his sons taking bribes on his behalf?
Give me a break. Anyone who thinks Trump was worse than Hillary and Biden has TDS and belongs in some woke college campus safe space with a coloring book without crayons.
Penn keeps saying "It's all emotion."
And he's right.
The fact that you hear "Hillary and Biden are awesome!" when anyone says anything remotely critical about Trump is a great example of how emotion rules the debate,
If you have to keep harkening back to a president two years gone while making little comment on the fucking nuclear waste dump we have now tells one a lot of what you think about the current administration.
Thanks for always being here to prove the commentaries points sarc. It's a thankless job but I'm glad you are here for it.
Don't thank him, thank Captain Morgan.
The spiced rum? Or the Masons' traitor?
*scans alphabets post for "Hillary and Biden are awesome!"*
Hey sarc, ever since you joined team Lying Jeffy, you’ve become even more dishonest.
This is why I keep saying "both sides". In terms of IQ, intelligence quotient as measured, the smartest president from the metrics was... wait for it... Jimmy Carter! Fricking nuclear engineer! And he was still a lousy president!
Trump is dump, Hillary is dumb, Biden is dumb, and the people who fawn over them are the dumbest of all.
Clinton and Trump are/were both very intelligent.
Bush2, Obama, and Biden are/were midwits at best.
Biden is a midwit when he's running at normal capacity.
Here's the thing that should scare the shit out of everyone, and to the best of my knowledge, I'm the only one who's framed it this way:
When you watch Biden, you're watching him at his worst. When you watch Kamala Harris, you're watching her at her best.
Neither really make any decisions. They're both props, in the fullest sense of the term. You're right that Kamala is an absolute moron, but her taking over for Biden won't change anything.
true
always irritates me a bit when people ascribe policy and actions to biden - he's like a bad movie special effect where you can just make out the wires that make things 'happen'
“Nardz:. They're both props, in the fullest sense of the term.”
I am just trying to picture who is so awful that using that the image of Biden and Kamala running things is an improvement.
Whoever is behind the curtain must be truly horrific.
No, even at his best Biden could only wish to be a midwit. Back in the '80s before and during his failed, laughable Presidential run, he was known as a buffoon, a liar and a plagiarist. Even Biden's best was very, very bad.
https://twitter.com/SallyMayweather/status/1552457489517518858?t=Qbg3r_Dwtvmjb_Igbn78EQ&s=19
[Meme]
Don't let Biden hear you say that!
https://twitter.com/JimmyPrinceton/status/1528559511203729408?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1528559511203729408%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fmoonbattery.com%2F
To believe that Trump is "very intelligent" is hitting religious levels of delusion about the guy.
No, it’s a comparative thing.
Trump didn’t use a unsecured private server for top-secret information, he didn’t blatantly plagiarize speeches, he didn’t claim that growing bureaucracy would make government more efficient, He never claimed that you could print more money to wealth.
It’s not a high bar look brighter than most of his competition. Frankly reminds me that old GeorgeCarlin joke, “Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” And apparently they mainly go in to government.
“and his rejection of it in the case of a nut running through town shooting people”
He should have gone with the driving around town with a bear in his trunk analogy. Aren’t comedians supposed to be funny?
Finally got off Bob Dylan
Did they really spend 20 minutes just talking about Bob Dylan?
Christ, leave the poor man alone. Even he realizes it's been decades since he's been relevant.
Yes they did. I decided that if the only way to get off Bob Dylan was to pretend Trump was worse than Hitler, I wasn't interested in the next hour and a half.
Damn shame. I really like Bullshit!. Heck, Nick used to be good too. TDS has ruined more lives than T.
TDS has ruined more lives than T.
Truth.
Oh Jesus, I make non-stop jokes about Gillespie and his rambling about Bob Dylan... I'm wondering if he's trolling me now.
Bob Dylan did Write every popular song ever made.
Stupid woke assholes ruines the video no direction period
I'm starting to actually think gushing about Bob Dylan might be a good litmus test for a leftist. There's too much overlap of those venn diagram circles...
In any Venn diagram, Bob Dylan himself could only be represented by multiple circles, some circles with dotted lines. Or maybe a circle moving around every five years.
What part of freedom involves hurting other people?
Personally, I would say "Football" but I think "abortion" might expose his own stupidity to him a little better. Not sure about his mask mandate answer but I'm sure that would demonstrate to him that he needs to think at least a little bit harder about the libertarian magic words that he left off of this question.
Dude, no, did they really talk Bob Dylan? I can't... no you're fuckin' with me.
The times - they are a-changin', man.
They are a changin' back... continuously...
In 2016 Penn declared he would vote for HRC
Fuck him
His other major party choice was fucking Donald Trump.
Kamala was fucking the Donald?
That was quite a stretch to make a joke that signals you are against the Democrats.
Yes, that's why I voted for Johnson in 2016 and Jorgensen in 2020. Wouldn't a fucking LIBERTARIAN have done that?
I did.
Penn talks of solutions to problems being not in restrictions or constrictions, but in freedom.
BUT HE SAID BAD THINGS ABOUT TRUMP!!!!!
Poor sarc
Leave the poor drunk alone. He’s convinced himself that’s what’s really going on (or let Lying Jeffy convince him of it), and realizing how much he’s missing would just cause another break. And he really can’t survive another break.
"or let Lying Jeffy convince him of it"
He's going to regret hitching his star to that freakshow. Sarc's drunk and gullible, but Jeff is genuinely deranged.
I'm pretty sure on Monday, when sarcasmic rushed in to white knight for Jeffy, he had no clue as to what Jeff was actually advocating.
Penn’s distaste for Trump isn’t just abstract. He knows fairly well, personally. And Trump took the time in the middle of a busy presidential campaign to pettily insult their Broadway show.
In fairness, Trump took time in the middle of a busy presidential campaign to insult just about anyone he could that didn't kiss his ring.
If it was me, I would prefer to be insulted to my face instead of insulted behind my back while remaining ignorant of what he really thought, but I understand there are many people who prefer the latter. This is what politicians count on.
Apparently, for many many people, particularly on the left backstabbing ass kissers is what they prefer, to someone who will confront you to your face. I suspect it is a side effect of coping with to Human Resources & bureaucracy, being forthright and plain speaking is very threatening to those people.
Penn is a bitch who never deserved his career.
His life doesn't matter.
The more I listen the more sins I hear him commit against true libertarianism.
HE SAID BAD THINGS ABOUT TRUMP!
Only one conclusion: he's a leftist.
That's stupid. Take Dave Smith for example. He's said, in no uncertain terms that Donald Trump was a war criminal who deserved to be locked up for war crimes. I'd say that counts as "saying bad things about Trump". But, he's an actual libertarian and not a leftist. He also suggested that the public shouldn't have been taken in by claims of "Russian collusion" from the MIC and that the impeachments and 1/6 Committee are idiotic show trials that defy basic tenets of due process. You see, yes he opposed Trump but remained committed to actual libertarian principle in his opposition. Big difference.
Tell that to the people I'm mocking.
I don't think they miss the point. You, Jillette and the writing staff here do. Responding to every criticism of attacks on Trump (including those that violate libertarian principle) with "HE SAID BAD THINGS ABOUT TRUMP!! GAH! HE MUST BE A LIBERAL!!!" is pretty clearly signing off on those attacks that violate libertarian principle.
I um, what dressing with your word salad?
What's not to understand if you're not already falling down drunk? Commenters here have pointed out how wildly unlibertarian some of the attacks on Trump were. The writing staff defended those attacks. Jillette defended those attacks. And you chose to mock the people pointing out how unlibertarian the attacks were by claiming they were just mindlessly supporting Trump. I don't think I can put it any simpler for you.
Commenters here have pointed out how wildly unlibertarian some of the attacks on Trump were.
You mean the commenters who point out that true libertarians are Republicans, so any attack on Trump is unlibertarian because true libertarians are Republicans?
That wasn’t hard to understand sarc.
That was completely understandable.
"word salad"
Oh look, another phrase sarcasmic doesn't understand the meaning of.
"...Responding to every criticism of attacks on Trump (including those that violate libertarian principle) with "HE SAID BAD THINGS ABOUT TRUMP!! GAH! HE MUST BE A LIBERAL!!!" is pretty clearly signing off on those attacks that violate libertarian principle..."
Making this claim is a pretty strong indicator that the claimant is a TDDS-addled asshole.
Find one person here who did not criticize at least one of his policies. You can't; your TDS-addled imagination is telling your that.
Stuff it up your ass.
If you intentionally ignore things the people you disagree with say, it’s a lot easier to mischaracterize them.
Well. Here's about what he said even woth exact quotations.
"If you intentionally ignore things the people you disagree with say, it’s a lot easier to mischaracterize them."
If you read what people post, you might learn something about them.
We can't tell when you're mocking. I doubt you can either.
People who are being mocked rarely see they're being mocked.
Youre mockery is just you being an ignorant dumbass who doesn't know what the topic is about.
Are you aware that Dave Smith is part of the Mises Caucus?
"People who are being mocked rarely see they're being mocked."
Only if they're drunk. You do put out the most incredible bullshit.
You mean all of us who listen to his podcast, have talked about his podcast on this very site, and supported him and the rest of the Mises caucus taking over the Libertarian Party?
Oh shit, sarc’s such a fucking drunk he doesn’t realize Dave Smith is part of the Mises caucus! Man, this shit just gets funnier and funnier.
You mean the people here that listen to Dave Smith and have openly stated the same issues they've has w trump. But also admit not everything he did was Hitler? Lol.
Youre such a retarded drunk.
It's not the Trump comments, it's the fact that based on his comments about masking, it appears he wouldn't know tyranny if it gagged him, locked him in his home and forced him into unwanted medical procedures.
Yeah. For someone who likes to throw around 'personal responsibility' he sure does short 'against their will' a lot.
Distorted indeed.
Should have informed Nick's article, but failed to.
Seems less like him rethinking his libertarianism and more like him rethinking the people who label themselves libertarian.
"...In the mid-2010s, he dropped 100 pounds in three months for health reasons—personifying the personal responsibility and self-improvement near the very center of libertarianism..."
Personal responsibility, like caring for his sown health instead of relying on others wearing face diapers?
There are no lack of commenters here claiming to be libertarians, with raging cases of TDS; that claim is no prophylaxis.
Darn, this guy was on the list of everyone who advised the Libertarian Party to "run someone well known in order to break out of the <1% vote category." Sounds like he would have been another Bill Weld and opened the Party to more criticism from the purists.
Anything that pisses off Libertarian Party purists is generally a good thing.
You are not a libertarian.
Penn may also be influenced by living in Las Vegas, a place where people go to behave irresponsibly.
Get to about 55 minutes, and all 3 of them say they're anti-Trump because, although he accomplished things they like, they didn't like the things he said. This really makes me burn up. Of all people, you think they'd be of the mind that deeds and consequences are more important than speech. So it's all about style points and posturing after all. Which means whatever they say, they don't mean!
"...Which means whatever they say, they don't mean!"
It's a shame TDS isn't fatal.
Behaving decently as a human being is not “style points and posturing”. When commenters here say things like that, they reveal a lot about themselves.
Which politicians behave like decent human beings?
Penn Jillette is a libertarian when it's convenient to him. It is interesting how sloppy his logic is in explaining his point of view. Sound like he has a personal grudge with Trump and based on the personal attacks against Trump make me think that they are too much alike.
Penn Jillette is the type of libertarian who believes that his views should be forced on others.
No, if you are familiar with the history between Trump and Jillette, Trump is the one with the grudge.
And the two people are nothing alike.
Seems like they have a mutual hostility. Listening to Penn talk about being on The Apprentice is pretty funny. But I still think he's letting his personal feelings about the man cloud his judgement a bit. I'm not saying libertarians should like Trump, but you have to look at the alternatives too.
I've noticed most people don't consider the alternative until after they've destroyed whatever it is they don't like.
---and lost his fucking mind.
Put pre-diet Penn against post diet Penn and it's almost like it's two different people. One is Penn Jillette, and the other is a retarded leftist.
He has talked about how stopping eating meat changed the way he thinks. I honestly think it's related to his change in politics and personality.
Absolutely.
Had a friend who did it and her vitamins got so out of whack that she counted count. Needless to say, she stopped. And became herself again.
Of course, this could explain why so many leftists appear to have some form of brain damage.
I disagree. He always struck me as an unprincipled, shallow-thinking contrarian. Even when he was fat he would routinely make arguments about how he didn't understand violent people and then, two sentences later, talk about people how people didn't need to be violent with modern policing. He was a crypto-post modernist before it was cool to be a raving, batshit crazy post modernist.
He went nuts when he found out his kid is nuts. It's no more complicated than that.
Penn Jillette needs Jesus.
I loved Penn because he seemed to be a happy libertarian who got along well with people like Glen Beck. This conversation changed my mind about him. He's a lefty who believes every lie about Trump the Left has flung. Yes Trump is narcissistic, vindictive and disloyal to friends, What matters is that he gave us the best economy since reagan and rolled back a ton of regulations, allowing people esp. minorities to create businesses. He did a lot of other good stuff too despite his horrible personality, and his making us energy independent was THE BEST. I am not at all sure he would win if he ran again, though.
When Penn said " I don't think anyone can doubt anymore about climate change" he lost me for good. Unless you get all your CC news from the NYT you have to be aware of how utterly propagandistic this issue is and how the Left is using it to transform our energy into a government controlled energy regulatory system that cannot provide anyone but the top one percent with reliable energy. Renewables are worse environmentally than our cleaned-up fossil fuel nation. The war on CO2 is literally anti-life - the entire biosphere depends on CO2 (plants, get it?) and we are nowhere near shoving toxic levels into the air. The warming is so mild as to be almost benign, and the heat and the weather extremes are the same as they were during the warming spell in the 1930s and 40s. Trump would be far far better than any Dem right now. Fortunately the Left doesn't have anyone remotely electable at this point.
I always kind of liked this guy, but he really lost me in this interview. While I don’t share his detest for Trump (my reviews of his presidency are mixed), I do believe that the ESSENCE of Libertarianism is that, with smaller government and keeping its role limited, it matters far less who occupies the White House, good or bad. Bad presidents (we have had several), always reinvigorate my Libertarian slant for this exact reason.
I'm a huge fan of Penn as a magician and because he is/was someone who wasn't afraid to be a contrarian. That said, Penn is not an intellectual. His is very much a fair-weather libertarian. As soon as it becomes hard to apply the principles in practice, he waivers, and not for pragmatic reasons, but instead because he isn't really ideologically moored.
Can Libertarianism or any opposing political philosophy Survive the Woke Biden Dictatorship of the Left?
Can Reason's writers leave their TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) behind and find Egalitarianism again?
Will the Democrats be displace or will freedom and liberty be lost forever in the USA?
Good Lord. What a farce this is.
Some of it is laughable, i.e., when Penn states with the utmost sincerity that it was okay for Obama to make shit-for-brains leftarded choices because they were carefully considered, and that he'd rather have a rational Statist in control than a slightly nutty but ultimately hands-off ineffectual boob.
Most of it, though, is just downright disturbing. In what libertarian universe is it okay to mandate vaccines just because people are scared they are going to die? In what libertarian universe is being sick a CRIME? In what libertarian universe are people reduced to weaponized agents of death, ready, willing, and able to kill our fellow humans?
Nowhere in Penn's short list of exceptions is simply not wanting to take the vaccine, period. No allowance for bodily autonomy, no allowance for the fact that the vast majority of people never were in any danger of dying of this thing and so the vaccine was unnecessary. Nope. According to Nick and Penn, you are either in lockstep with the vaccine, no questions asked, or you are an anti-vaxxer idiot Pizza Gate Q Anon loony.
Even worse? Zero acknowledgement that, guess what? It is by now obvious that the vaccines are useless at stopping infection and spread.
Fuck Penn for this, and fuck Nick for not calling the man on his "bullshit."
Scout’s honor, I don’t know anyone that takes this guy seriously
He pretends to an easy live-and-let-live attitude but you can see the Hitler in him
“There is no god, and that’s the simple truth. If every trace of any single religion were wiped out and nothing were passed on, it would never be created exactly that way again. There might be some other nonsense in its place, but not that exact nonsense. If all of science were wiped out, it would still be true and someone would find a way to figure it all out again.” ― Penn Jillette, God, No! Signs You May Already Be an Atheist and Other Magical Tales
I know exactly what he means by that : Give me the power and I will wipe these people of the the face of the earth.
If he died tomorrow I would schedule a party. and I would crave a science debate with him, he's said so many dumb anti-science things.
And look at the dumb self-contradiction in the following, which he dearly BELIEVES
“If there's something you really want to believe, that's what you should question the most.”
― Penn Jillette
UNless you are a baby
“We are only here for a little while, and our bodies belong to ourselves and no one else.”
― Penn Jillette, God, No! Signs You May Already Be an Atheist and Other Magical Tales
One last comment, why with all the Islamic killings, forced child marriages, FGM, honor killing, etc, is the UN Declaration of Human Rights still a dead letter after 75 years?
Because of people like Jillette who won't even work for freedom of religion because it undercuts their anti-religion agenda. Jilllette or Jihad -- just the same thing coming from opposite directions
To me, he is a complete fraud.