The statements in this COVID vaccine case are far more hostile to religion than the statements from Masterpiece Cakeshop
Seth Barrett Tillman and I discuss whether President Trump can be disqualified from a second term pursuant to Section 3.
Judicial courage is defined by casting a vote "under fire," knowing that it will be unpopular.
She still does not understand who decides.
The Chief sips at the trough of Cooper v. Aaron.
The Court's decision provides a very narrow path for relief that probably won't allow the clinics to reopen.
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson incorporated a Texas state court decision from Thursday afternoon.
A discussion at the Heritage Foundation.
President Biden's decision to permit the congressional investigation of the 2020 election's aftermath will invariably affect the 2024 election.
Eleventh Circuit found that architectural design would not be understood as protected speech.
Guns, Abortion, and Affirmative Action in a single year. Why not?
The deadline is 2/25/21
"When faced with a conflict between text and precedent, we should maximize the former—and minimize the latter."
"The Supreme Court’s ruling in the abortion case, expected next June, will be a defining moment in the Right’s battle for the Constitution."
The court did not decide if all jury verdicts from that court are now subject to review.
United brings back pre-departure drinks, glassware, and ceramic plates.
Could the plumber have claimed "finders keepers"?
A compendium of my writings on the case.
In the Legal Tender Cases, the Supreme Court reversed itself after two new Justices were appointed who favored the validity of paper money.
Still no decision on the Texas fetal heartbeat case.
Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan had no difficulty overruling Baker v. Nelson, and millennia of tradition.
No, Lochner was not "about pure laissez faire."
Philip B. Heymann, who died this week, did not clerk for JMH I.
If she is so worried about the Court's politicization, she wouldn't expend so much effort to call her colleagues partisans.
Featuring unprecedented feats of jurisprudential strength.
Justice Sotomayor said "23 to 24 months," but she obviously meant "23 to 24 weeks." The error was understandable, but is it proper for the Supreme Court transcript to be corrected?
"On Wednesday, two current members of the Court channelled the logic of the Justices they clerked for."
Don't get cocky.
I did not expect Chief Justice Roberts to say that the viability line was dicta based on Justice Blackmun's papers.
What methodology should be used to determine if Roe was wrong?
The Justices who profess the greatest respect for democracy forget the Court is the least democratic branch.
No, Marbury did not say that "the Supreme Court is the last word on what the Constitution means."
The former Dean exercised her right to remain silent to ensure maximum space for negotiation at conference.
I ran the YouTube Feed through Otter.ai.
Fried and Meese offer very different conceptions of legal conservatism.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks