There was some cross-talk on The View, but Jackson seems to have said that Kamala Harris's nomination "‘gives a lot of people hope."
She doesn't write about the Court, and the press is strictly prohibited from asking about anything of interest.
Can the Attorney General Appoint a Special Counsel?
Is fox hunting a (religious) belief?
Both of the leading presidential candidates understand what makes a successful Supreme Court pick.
Imagine if 400 people were killed in cold blood at Burning Man.
Hostages from this kibbutz were held only a few kilometers away.
Fifty minutes of pure, uncensored barbarism that will haunt me for the rest of my life.
That may have been true about two decades ago, but conservative is as conservative does.
Two tidbits from the New York Times that I did not know.
Justice Gorsuch joins the three dissenters on severability. What about Justices Thomas and Barrett?
Also, Judges Kacsmaryk and Ho seem vindicated on the statute of limitations to challenge mifepristone.
Knowing all that we know, I struggle to see how putting Harris in the White House would "save conservatism."
Nat Lewin relays the story from his 1962 clerkship with Justice Harlan.
Maybe the Roberts Court was right and the Burger Court was wrong.
Judge Ezra boasted about knowing the judges on the Fifth Circuit, being sworn into the Texas Bar by the Chief Judge's husband, and threatened to have the Deputy Solicitor General's lawyer removed from the courtroom.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks