Justice Sotomayor's rhetoric in Trump v. United States mirrors the claims from Trump impeachment 1.0
We know that she didn't agree on the evidentiary issue. Beyond that, the disjunction is unclear.
Justice Thomas demonstrates why Justice Scalia erred in his letter to Tillman.
Trump v. United States favorably cited Chief Justice Marshall's pseudonymic essay defending McCulloch v. Maryland.
Defenders of the Mueller investigation routinely argued that the threat of civil enforcement was worse than a federal prosecution.
Official, Individual, and Personal.
Chief Justice Roberts sought to put an end to Lawfare against the presidency.
President Biden nominated the non-prevailing attorneys in Dobbs and SFFA to the First and Fourth Circuits, respectively.
McConnell: "Dismantling the administrative state and empowering people who are actually elected to make decisions has been the motivating force" for nearly every "Federalist Society-type lawyer."
Justice Jackson's "participation" in Relentless and SFFA further demonstrates why the usual recusal rules will not work for the Supreme Court.
How will the Board of Immigration Appeals operate in a world without Chevron?
Justice Thomas agrees with the "lion's share" of Justice Gorsuch's concurrence.
SCOTUS GVR's Range, sends Second Amendment to inferior court purgatory.
It was not the Fifth Circuit.
Alito had only four majority opinions this term, while Roberts, Thomas, Sotomayor, and Kagan all had seven.
Download the edited version from the 2024 Barnett/Blackman supplement.
The name of the company is Loper Bright Enterprises.
But after a second, a third, and a fourth read, all of the fancy veneers and window dressing start to come off.
How much will actually change after Loper Bright?
Ending the Epicycles of Chevron.
He really doesn't care what we think.
The Chief Justice retconned Federalist Nos. 37 and 78.
Fischer and Snyder both ducked this issue.
Justice Kavanaugh is very, very upset about the Sackler bankruptcy case.
Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.
Monday, Monday, Monday! Trump, NetChoice, Corner Post!
Justice Barrett adamantly resists the suggestion that she keeps leveling up the burden on plaintiffs, but it is becoming more difficult to deny.
Why did Lopez, who was paid $40 to bring a gun to a school, succeed on a facial challenge, but the Court wouldn't even consider Rahimi's circumstances?
Chevron, Netchoice, Trump, Grant's Pass, Fischer, and Corner Post.
Unlike Justices Sotomayor and Kagan, Justice Jackson has no problems criticizing Justice Barrett.
And they charge that Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh "lost the will" to decide the case.
Justice Kagan and Sotomayor set the stage for Justice Barrett's vote.
Cert before judgment will no longer be granted unless the applicants prove they will suffer enough irreparable harm.
June 2022 was one victory after another for conservatives. June 2024 seems just the opposite.
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks