Did Kennedy v. Bremerton overrule the precedent on precedent from Rodriguez de Quijas?
It is never too early to make predictions!
Can a federal judge ask a DOJ lawyer "What do you think Jesus would say"?
Apart from the Appointments Clause, I think we are standing at the precipice of federal courts revolution.
But Justice Thomas is still the only Justice who (correctly) concludes that Haywood v. Drown (2009) was incorrectly decided.
This decision may not pan out for the court.
Twenty-two teams of high school students presented oral arguments on Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton.
There are two sides to the constitutional crisis coin: if the president seeks a timely appeal, courts should consider those appeals in a timely fashion.
Another problematic point raised in a resignation letter.
Another day, another resignation letter.
The ABA has been planting the seeds of its own demise for decades.
The District Court injunction did not stay its ruling, but the Court of appeals did shortly thereafter.
Judge Bibas, sitting by designation in the District of Delaware, revises his prior summary judgment opinion.
Prosecutorial discretion comes full circle.
Everyone take a deep breath.
The President did offer some potential causes for removal.
The "forgiveness doctrine" should be the basis for continued immunity while in office.
Congress has no role in funding the CFPB. The Director can request as much as is "reasonably necessary." What if he decides that amount is $0?
There is no Incompatibility Clause problem. And so long as the position is uncompensated, there would be no problem with the Domestic Emoluments Clause.
Congress enacted a facially unconstitutional provision, and the Solicitor General could only ask the Supreme Court to overrule Hammer.
The separation of politics, not the separation of powers, will decide Wilcox v. Trump.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks