Congress enacted a facially unconstitutional provision, and the Solicitor General could only ask the Supreme Court to overrule Hammer.
The separation of politics, not the separation of powers, will decide Wilcox v. Trump.
The government would have a much stronger interest to ban a Chinese AI app that collects proprietary information than to ban a social media app that displays dance videos.
There was not exactly a denial.
Does Trump think the 30 day notice requirement infringes his Article II powers? Will he cite President Obama's refusal to provide notice of the Bowe Bergdahl transfers?
Jefferson likely would have ignored any command from Chief Justice Marshall, and Marbury did not issue such a command.
How many reporters asked Martha Ann Alito about her flags?
The limitation is not technology, but confidentiality.
"The most important predictor of behavior on the bench is judicial courage."
Or can only Congress declare an invasion, like Congress has the sole power to declare war?
DHS will subject to expedited removal aliens "who are apprehended anywhere in the United States more than 100 air miles from a U.S. international land border, and who have been continuously present in the United States for less than two years"
It seems to have taken some time to corral Justice Barrett's vote in a case involving evidence and sex-based slurs.
The timing of this order seems structured to moot a Supreme Court appeal in 90 days.
The Resistance sues a non-existent entity based on an irrelevant statute.
The order would exclude and remove aliens who "bear hostile attitudes" to our "founding principles."
Does anyone still want to talk about Martha Ann Alito's flags?
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Foreign Emoluments Clause.
"Well I guess now I have precedent to do it, but I don't want to do it..."
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks