Glossip and Oklahoma have no response to the fact that that Glossip's defense team knew all about the allegedly "withheld" Brady information.
Both candidates mentioned the importance of new supply to bring down housing costs. But their focus was firmly on their chosen boogeymen.
Post your recommendations in the comments; other weeks, there'll be other posts for other genres and other formats.
The first debate question was a pitch for war with Iran. Tim Walz and J.D. Vance both dodged it.
The new law should help licensed retailers compete with the black market while mitigating the odor that offends Donald Trump and J.D. Vance.
The education chapter is written by Williamson Evers, and the corporate law chapter by Robert T. Miller.
It's easy to snark and mock Donald Trump and J.D. Vance for spreading awful, racist lies. The Democratic ticket should aim to do more.
Conservatives blame Proposition 47 (2014) for higher rates of shoplifting in the state, but the real story is more complicated.
Plus: Israeli troops cross into Lebanon, prayer illiteracy on full display, veeps joust, and more...
Glossip alleges that his prosecutors withheld evidence at his murder trial—and the Oklahoma A.G. curiously supports his claim. But the prosecutors didn't withhold anything. And the victim's family remains enmeshed in decades of frivolous capital litigation that has now reached the Supreme Court.
Policy nihilism is consuming the 2024 election.
Plus: Fentanyl wars, rent stabilization in NYC, possible dockworker strike, and more...
"2024 presidential candidate who once dumped a dead bear in Central Park"
Veterinary speech, inflation reduction, and Inspector Javert's playbook.
A lot more than Oren Cass and J.D. Vance want you to think, and Americans wouldn't like the tradeoffs necessary.
Plus: Long live Eric Adams, Electoral College bias, and more...
What happened when some officials role-played a bigger, noisier rerun of January 6, 2021
Weak after-the-fact "collaboration" in no way substantiates or justifies cruel allegations against Haitians in Springfield.
There are any number of reasons to support or oppose a switch to ranked choice voting, but most of the opposition comes from the majority parties.
An ex-Secret Service agent explains what he thinks left Donald Trump vulnerable to two close-call assassination attempts within two months.
If the former president wins the 2024 race, the circumstances he would inherit are far more challenging, and several of his policy ideas are destructive.
His polling was not "always in range" of beating Donald Trump.
Plus: How the Trump assassination attempt happened, a word from Christopher Moltisanti, and more...
For hundreds of years, a felony has been defined not by the action itself but by how we punish it.
Although the Republican presidential nominee has denied those accusations, he has also bragged about strikingly similar behavior.
Harris' campaign hasn't said where she stands now. But she's historically taken a tough stance against prostitution and especially against men who pay for it.
His ideas would leave us poorer and less free.
Plus: Hezbollah targets Tel Aviv, death pods in Switzerland, mapping San Francisco's decay, and more...
Lower taxes are better taxes, but they should be part of well-considered plans.
Both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris support supply-side tactics that are worse than ineffective.
Post your recommendations in the comments; other weeks, there'll be other posts for other genres and other formats.
Not everything is about politics.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks