Ninth Circuit Denies Government Request for Emergency Relief in Birthright Citizenship Case
The first of what may be many appellate rulings on the Trump Administration's most controversial and questionable Executive Order.
The first of what may be many appellate rulings on the Trump Administration's most controversial and questionable Executive Order.
Why their response to me and other critics fails to refute key objections.
Their argument for denying birthright citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants born in the US has multiple weaknesses, including that it would also have denied it to former slaves.
The two rulings highlight the weaknesses of Trump's legal position.
Federal judges in Washington and Maryland say the president's attack on birthright citizenship flouts the 14th Amendment and 127 years of judicial precedent.
Demographer Julia Gelatt of the Migration Policy Institute joins Just Asking Questions to discuss the likely effects of the president's executive orders on immigration.
The executive order contradicts the 14th Amendment and 127 years of judicial precedent.
Former Rep. Justin Amash explains why President Donald Trump's interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment is wrong.
The arguments are not new. The willingness of an Administration to act on them are.
“I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one is,” said Judge John C. Coughenour.
The TRO blocks the order for 14 days and is a sign that courts are highly skeptical of Trump's position.
It applies to children of large numbers of legal visa-holders, as well as those of undocumented immigrants.
Children could be denied citizenship even if their parents are here completely legally.
Legal scholars Amanda Frost and Paul Gowder have both published notable new articles on the subject.
The executive order that the president-elect plans to issue contradicts the historical understanding of the 14th Amendment.
My new Just Security article explains why denying birthright citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants would be unconstitutional.
Both plans are an affront to America’s image as a nation of immigrants.
Some scholars and commentators argue that legacy preferences at public universities are unconstitutional because they are a form of hereditary privilege. If so, the same is likely true of the far more consequential hereditary privilege of citizenship that severely restricts the right to live and work in the United States.
In 2003, the prominent conservative Republican senator proposed an amendment that would have eliminated the requirement that the president be a "natural born citizen."
The ridiculous controversy over Kamala Harris' eligibility to be Vice President reinforces the point.
The Trump administration is trying to make it harder for pregnant women to enter the country as tourists since they might give birth while here.
Their main purpose is to stick it to immigrants working for Uncle Sam overseas
Plus: Gillibrand ends presidential campaign, trouble for Forever 21, and more...
Why Hoda Muthana Can't Be Kept Out of the United States
President Trump's hardline immigration stances have made for some polarizing debates.
Why Trump cannot eliminate birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants by executive order.
The president's executive order will violate the text and history of the 14th Amendment.
At least one Republican congressman agrees.
Plus: Southern border will see more troops than Iraq, Syria.
The Expatriate Terrorist Act will terrorize Americans more than ISIS
His Expatriate Terrorist Act is a mischievous bill that'll endanger all Americans
And just plain mean-spiritedly stupid and wrong, too.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks