Report: Afghanistan Can't Manage Military Bases Without NATO
So we'll be there for a while, it seems
So we'll be there for a while, it seems
Protection of leaders results in some troubling outcomes
Former head of Yugoslav army claims he was not aware of atrocities committed by those under his command during wars in Bosnia and Croatia
Not the most elegantly framed sentiment
Caught up in battle between Taliban and international forces
Meddling in other countries' domestic affairs is always wise
Keep stirring the pot, Mitt
New series explores our current cultural dichotomy of defiance and authoritarianism.
Even the Pentagon doesn't want them anymore
America's longest-serving Republican congressman turns against Afghanistan
Accuses the government of "concealing the truth" about Islam after his classes were shut down
Original goal: Push back Taliban. New goal: Prepare Afghan military
Matt Welch and Kennedy discuss what's in the new issue of Reason.
The forces apparently anticipate an Israeli strike against Iran
Patrolling side-by-side was getting a bit nerve-wracking, was it?
Are "last gasps" the same as "death throes"?
Gee, what could possibly be causing our troops to drink more than they did in the '90s?
Don't any of these people know there are other choices than the two major parties?
Hundreds of ships, airplane, and other materials would be needed
Democrats have been more rhetorically anti-war than actually so
Points out ending war in Iraq, increasing health care for vets
Rand Paul gets his four paragraphs in, but the Republican Party is still firmly interventionist.
U.S. considers Haqqani network a major destabilizing force.
Say the President is thinking of using Assad's chemical weapons as justification for military intervention
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10