Why Are 38 Percent of Stanford Students Saying They're Disabled?
If you get into an elite college, you probably don't have a learning disability.
If you get into an elite college, you probably don't have a learning disability.
What the controversy over a failing grade for a bad essay reveals about the true purpose of higher education.
FTC staff support the proposal by the Texas Supreme Court to allow for alternative means of accreditation.
The decision isn't a value judgment. It's a recognition that nursing school is usually cheaper than medical school.
Jason Riley and Paul Frymer debate affirmative action and the Supreme Court.
I coauthored the article with four other legal scholars from across the political spectrum.
Zohran Mamdani’s campaign shows how the rhetoric of working-class revolution now resonates most with the highly educated.
Plus: Zohran Mamdani's photo ops, hearings on Caribbean boat strikes, how the pandemic changed the world, and more...
Plus: The Dignity of Dependence, infinite scroll, ZIRP narratives, and more...
The expenditures are often costly privileges for special interests that mask the true size of government and fail to deliver the promised bang for the buck.
The potential nationalization and forced revenue sharing of university patents makes a strong case for the separation of economy and state.
As students grapple with an unfriendly immigration system and targeted crackdowns on campus, how long will the U.S. remain the world's top study destination?
Plus: War Department, government ownership stake in Intel, National Guard members become cleaning crews, and more...
How to fix the conferences, the rules, the playoffs, and more
Obviously drag shows are protected by the First Amendment.
Some suggestions that might help you make better use of the opportunities available to you in law school.
Universities’ internal culture wars threaten free speech and inquiry, but political attacks on research funding and infrastructure are crippling U.S. scientific leadership.
University Presidents are divided on how to respond to pressure from the Trump Administration. Are their concerns too little, too late?
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression is seeking an injunction that would protect noncitizens at The Stanford Daily from arrest and removal because of their published work.
My new paper thinking through the political calculus of independent universities
The university's president has maintained that Harvard will not risk losing its academic freedom, and it may delay any settlement negotiations until after a final court ruling.
The campus' settlement with the federal government is bound to create free speech headaches.
Plus: regulating college sports, forgiving baseball’s legends, and Happy Gilmore 2
To reinstitute $400 million in federal funding, the university agreed to implement plans to combat antisemitism and to appoint an independent monitor to oversee changes.
The investigation comes only two days after a federal judge cast doubt on the Trump administration’s argument in Harvard’s lawsuit over federal funding.
The government's gaslighting strategy suggests that federal officials are not confident about the constitutionality of punishing students for expressing anti-Israel views.
Plus: City-run grocery stores, Peronists for prison, California can't figure out how minimum wage hikes work, and more...
AI cheating is often a crutch for students ill-equipped to attend a four-year university.
The university says it will continue to defend itself against government overreach.
The government’s lawyers also say that supposedly nonexistent policy is perfectly consistent with the First Amendment.
Under the bills, homeschooling curricula would have to meet state learning standards and students would be required to complete annual wellness checks.
The big problem here is the elite racism of college admissions departments, not the mayoral candidate's creative box-checking.
The organization was unfair to female competitors, was unfair to Lia Thomas, and handed the Trump administration a win on a silver platter.
Jim Ryan is the latest casualty in Trump's unconstitutional war against elite universities.
The Trump administration continues its war against disfavored speech.
First-place finishes include a piece on the Dutch "dropping" rite of passage, a documentary exploring citizen journalism and free speech, and a long-form interview with exoneree Amanda Knox.
Marco Rubio’s nebulous invocation of foreign policy interests is bound to have a chilling impact on freedom of speech, which is the whole point.
Medical school is so expensive in the first place because of a policy that gives medical students unlimited access to loans.
A bill awaiting the governor's signature represents a stark reversal from a 2019 law aimed at promoting "uninhibited debate."
U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz highlights the chilling impact of Marco Rubio's dubious rationale for deporting students whose views offend him.
Most of what the department does would likely stick around, for better or for worse.
An explainer from Brian Galle
Even if the president was joking in both cases, he already has used his powers to punish people whose views offend him.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon said the school’s handling of campus antisemitism violated civil rights law and is grounds for revoking accreditation.
The president treats legal constraints as inconveniences that can be overridden by executive fiat.
Under new State Department guidance, having private or no social media presence "may be reflective of evasiveness and call into question [a student visa] applicant's credibility."
Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.
Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks