7 Modules for First Amendment (Speech and Religion)
Powerpoint Slides and Videos from "An Introduction to Constitutional Law"
Powerpoint Slides and Videos from "An Introduction to Constitutional Law"
The Fifth Circuit struck the brief. Judge Brasher (CA11) recused.
Threats Against Federal Judges on the Rise
Powerpoint Slides and Videos from "An Introduction to Constitutional Law"
It's Schrems II in episode 325 of the Cyberlaw Podcast
The former uses "further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion" and the latter uses "further proceedings consistent with this opinion."
Obviously not, but the Associated Press says otherwise.
Powerpoint Slides and Videos from "An Introduction to Constitutional Law"
Colleges need to establish continuity of operations plans to deal to ensure minimal disruptions in teaching and grading.
Helter Skelter: An American Myth doesn’t shed new light, but it’s excellent journalism.
State Prosecutors would then prosecute state criminal offenses in federal court.
A surprisingly agreeable chat on originalism, the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts and other things.
For state court appeals, 25 days "after entry of judgment." For federal court appeals, "a formal mandate does not issue unless specifically directed."
Noxious odors, trained scientists, and aberrantly salacious products.
A rare gun owner victory in New York court.
As usual, the answer is ... procedure, more procedure, and procedure about procedure.
Developing high-quality content is difficult, time-consuming, and expensive. No content may be better for students than weak content.
Opinion states that an "inaccurate, offensive, or upsetting" point of view discussed at a CLE Program would not violate Model Rule 8.4(g).
A quick scramble to end a man’s life, despite objections by attorneys and even the relatives of his victims
A court delay on Friday was lifted over the weekend, only to be reinstated Monday for different reasons.
The NYPD is still blaming jail releases, but the data simply doesn’t back that claim up.
It officially adopted the political theory of the United States: securing the individual rights of We the People
Equality, inalienable rights, and consent of the governed can be opposed only by reactionaries
Seven Justices agree to to allow "Online" bar exam in October. Two Justices would "adopt a diploma privilege in lieu of the bar examination."
Excessive radon, Armageddon, and a hopeless romantic.
The Court quietly ruled on Abortion, Free Exercise, the Mueller Report, Voting Rights, and the Suspension Clause.
What happens when a decades-long mystery gets solved while you’re explaining it?
Partners (who needn't be romantically involved with each other) can benefit from each other's health insurance—but siblings living together can't.
Phase 1 began with South Bay v. Newsom on May 29. Now, we go into Phase 10: Overtime.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks