FBI Abuse of Surveillance an Issue in Petraeus Scandal
Email spying doesn't appear to be tied to anything resembling an actual threat
Email spying doesn't appear to be tied to anything resembling an actual threat
The Wall Street Journal notes a possibly inappropriately close relationship between the woman whose complaints of harassing emails began the investigation that led to Petraeus' career-ending affair and the FBI agent doing the investigating.
That would be a felony in Illinois
Filed a patent that would use cameras to detect whether user paid for content being viewed, be it on a TV or a smartphone
You have to wonder if John Galt his own self has taken the helm at the Telecommunications Industry Association.
Good luck avoiding these
It's why they need more power, of course
Just what do the feds plan to force companies to do for them?
It's slow progress, but a federal judge agrees with the Electronic Frontier Foundation that federal agencies, including the FBI, are dragging their feet on releasing documents that would reveal the extent to which private companies will be forced to tailor their technology to make it easier for the government to spy on the Internet.
It's different when the guy you like does it
"Extraordinarily wide-reaching power," says Justice Kennedy
And if you don't like it, they already know
All this over a friggin' copyright case
Very skeptical of government arguments
What is this "Fourth Amendment" of which you speak?
Will decide whether Americans are even allowed to challenge the practice
Called out by Jon Stewart, he fibbed
If we're allowed to assert our rights, the nation would surely crumble
So that you fear international snoops instead of terrorists
Spying on New York's Muslims, baiting them, and taking their words out of context.
"Stingray" tracks all the mobile devices on a given network in an area
They should probably lose them when "working late at the office"
But it would inconvenience everybody
It's only bad when countries America doesn't like do it
What do you have to hide? Oh ... that.
He said he didn't know, but he did, and then ...
Yes, it's designed to operate beyond the reach of D.C.'s spooks
Feds claim their conduct is immune to judicial scrutiny
How could they not love snoopy technology?
It doesn't make sense under law and couldn't have happened that way
The coverup, once again, is worse than the crime
I spy, with my little eye ...
An explosive Senate report
The feds aren't backing off their civil liberties-free stance
The surveillance state is everywhere
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.