Restoring the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
Article for Cato Supreme Court Review
Article for Cato Supreme Court Review
Regulators imposed the ban based on a highly implausible and counterintuitive reading of federal law.
Lawmakers claimed they were just banning marketing guns to kids.
It is unlikely to stop mass shootings, but it will restrict Second Amendment rights and unjustly send people to prison.
Even while conceding that the rifles they want to ban are commonly used for lawful purposes, they refuse to grapple with the implications.
Political scientist David Leal explains why conservatives should reject efforts to compel states and localities to help enforce federal laws these jurisdictions oppose.
On average, the minimum requirement for cops is about 650 hours, compared to about 1,300 hours for barbers.
Yet the civil rights movement has long had a gun rights component.
Recent polling suggests that Americans are starting to recognize that such laws make no sense.
A new state law prohibits localities from prohibiting or licensing "no-impact" home-based businesses. That's allowing a Des Moines couple to sell guns from their house located just across the street from the governor's mansion.
The Senate majority leader has repeatedly blocked a bill that would address the robbery threat to state-licensed pot shops.
No, these rifles are not "the weapon of choice in most mass murders."
The streaming platform has said gun- and abortion-related ads submitted by Democrats are too controversial to be aired.
Both laws seek to evade judicial review by delegating enforcement exclusively to private parties.
Ruling against town of Superior's law is the first post-Bruen decision on arms bans
That new crime, which is punishable by up to 15 years in federal prison, includes receipt of firearms by "prohibited persons."
Plus: The emptiness of "national conservatism," anti-tech antitrust antics, and more...
Taking personal responsibility turns out to be a better idea than putting faith in the state.
The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act increases the penalties for violating arbitrary firearm bans.
Only you can be relied upon to protect you and your loved ones. Ignore anybody who claims otherwise.
The vast majority of federal firearm offenses involve illegal possession, often without aggravating conduct or a history of violence.
Senior Editor Jacob Sullum examines how the claim that Japanese gun restrictions account for the country's low violent crime rate isn't as simple as it sounds.
The Supreme Court unambiguously rejected the sort of reasoning that a federal appeals court used to uphold New York's ban.
The Institute for Justice urges SCOTUS to renounce that open-ended exception to the Fourth Amendment.
The risk of broad and overcautious policies is one we should take more seriously.
Several states are retaining subjective criteria for carry permits or imposing new restrictions on gun possession.
And, even more exciting, there’s personal jurisdiction thrown in.
While gun control enthusiasts rushed to defend Japan's firearm restrictions after Shinzo Abe's assassination, copying that approach in the U.S. is legally, politically, and practically impossible.
Some states promptly eliminated subjective standards, while others refused to recognize the decision's implications.
Like it or not, the Thomas Court is here.
I asked scholars, podcasters, and passersby how they'd change the nation's founding charter. Here's what they told me.
The answers underline the limitations of laws that aim to prevent this sort of crime by restricting access to firearms.
"I don't need to have numbers," Gov. Kathy Hochul said when asked about the evidence supporting the law.
Plus: Inflation eats up Americans' savings, copyright officials want to protect your fireworks photos, and more...
Leading libertarian legal scholar Randy Barnett talks about abortion, gun rights, and worrying trends at the highest court in the land.
The gun control policies under discussion are fundamentally ill-suited to prevent mass shootings.
The Court told appeals courts to reconsider their conclusions in light of last week's ruling against New York's restrictions on public possession of firearms.
Plus: America's falling murder clearance rate, the Fed wrestles with inflation, and more...
The leading libertarian legal theorist talks about worrying trends at the Supreme Court as a conservative majority takes hold.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks